Re: [yocto] How to extract files from wic.gz image?

On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 10:21:40PM +1000, JH wrote: > Hi, > > What command and tools to extract files from Yocto / bitbake image > such as dev-image-20190528085324.rootfs.wic.gz? > > I am using IMX UUU to install dev-image-20190528085324.rootfs.wic.gz > to IMX, I was advised to extract the

[linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCH] usb-net: Add RNDIS host support

Enable support for the USB RNDIS host driver. This is commonly seen with Android devices being used in USB tether mode. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini --- features/usb-net/usb-net.cfg | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/features/usb-net/usb-net.cfg b/features/usb-net/usb-net.cfg index

Re: [yocto] [oe] [OE-core] Git commit process question.

On Wed, Apr 03, 2019 at 11:30:39AM +0100, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Tue, 2 Apr 2019 at 20:46, Tom Rini wrote: > > > The kernel does not have "upgrade foo to the latest upstream version" > > > commits. > > > > > > With the Automatic Upgrade Hel

Re: [yocto] [oe] [OE-core] Git commit process question.

On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 02:24:51PM -0700, akuster808 wrote: > > > On 4/2/19 12:47 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 04:45:16AM +, Jon Mason wrote: > >> On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 6:41 AM Mark Hatle wrote: > >>> On 4/1/19 6:20 PM, akuster808 wr

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Git commit process question.

On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 04:45:16AM +, Jon Mason wrote: > On Tue, Apr 2, 2019 at 6:41 AM Mark Hatle wrote: > > > > On 4/1/19 6:20 PM, akuster808 wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 4/1/19 4:02 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > >> On Mon, 2019-04-01 at 15:33 -0700, akuster808 wrote: > > >>> Hello, > > >>>

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] Git commit process question.

On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 09:51:21AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 04:20:41PM -0700, akuster808 wrote: > > > > > > On 4/1/19 4:02 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: > > > On Mon, 2019-04-01 at 15:33 -0700, akuster808 wrote: > > >> Hello, > > >> > > >> I have noticed a large number of

[linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCH] sound: Re-enable ENS1370 support

Both the qemux86 and qemux86-64 targets RRECOMMEND the ens1370 kernel module and set QB_AUDIO_OPT to support that as one of the audio cards as well. Fixes: daadaf7fd7d5 ("yocto-kernel-cache: [PATCH] Update audio support v2") Signed-off-by: Tom Rini --- cfg/sound.cfg | 2 +- 1 file

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 05:42:03PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 17:27, Mark Hatle wrote: > > You can also blacklist busybox to ensure that it never builds, and thus > > can't > > show up in your target image. > > > > PNBLACKLIST[busybox] = "Don't build this" > > Sounds

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH V2] xmlsec1: add PACKAGECONFIG disable-des

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 01:46:25PM +0800, changqing...@windriver.com wrote: > From: Changqing Li > > Signed-off-by: Changqing Li Reviewed-by: Tom Rini -- Tom signature.asc Description: PGP signature -- ___ yocto mailing l

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 02:27:37PM +, Richard Purdie wrote: > On Thu, 2019-02-28 at 12:05 +, Burton, Ross wrote: > > On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 at 05:20, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > > That's a good start. For a oe-core packagegroup > > > > > > I do not think a core-only packagegroup makes sense

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 11:02:06PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 22:25, Jean-Christian de Rivaz > wrote: > > The project I work for need nodejs and chromium (and a >100MB database > > on some nodes), so space is not an issue. I need to deliver an useful > > distribution with

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 11:40:37PM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 03:09:02PM -0500, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 09:06:38PM +0100, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: > >... > > > So as expected systemd is there and busybox is not. But there

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 10:31:15AM +1300, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Thursday, 28 February 2019 9:09:02 AM NZDT Tom Rini wrote: > > Somewhere on my (and other > > folks too) TODO list is a packagegroup that includes procps and psmisc > > and grep and tar and various netw

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 09:06:38PM +0100, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: > Thank you very much Tom for help. Here is my complete method: > > git clone git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky -b thud > cd poky > cat << EOF > meta-poky/conf/distro/poky-ng.conf > require conf/distro/poky.conf > DISTRO =

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 06:47:52PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 18:45, Tom Rini wrote: > > OK, so I've kicked things a bit harder again, and here's what I see as > > the (small) rub. > > $ git grep hddimg meta/conf/ > > meta/conf/machine/include

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 06:35:10PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 17:58, Tom Rini wrote: > > I'm not sure we can blacklist busybox from the build at this time > > (hddimg requires initramfs that requires busybox) but instead only force > > remove it from

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 05:42:03PM +, Burton, Ross wrote: > On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 at 17:27, Mark Hatle wrote: > > You can also blacklist busybox to ensure that it never builds, and thus > > can't > > show up in your target image. > > > > PNBLACKLIST[busybox] = "Don't build this" > > Sounds

Re: [yocto] Removing busybox

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 01:16:56PM +0100, Jean-Christian de Rivaz wrote: > Hi all, > > After reading the thread "Removing busybox completely from the generated > image" I tested to reproduce the method but this doesn't work as expected. > > git clone git://git.yoctoproject.org/poky -b thud > cd

Re: [yocto] [meta-security][PATCH] xmlsec1: add PACKAGECONFIG disable-des

On Wed, Feb 27, 2019 at 04:38:10PM +0800, changqing...@windriver.com wrote: > From: Changqing Li > > Signed-off-by: Changqing Li > --- > recipes-security/xmlsec1/xmlsec1_1.2.27.bb | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/recipes-security/xmlsec1/xmlsec1_1.2.27.bb >

Re: [linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCH] netfilter: Enable CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_LOG

On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 10:46:13AM -0500, Bruce Ashfield wrote: > merged. > > SRCREV updates will be sent out with my next queue. Thanks. What's the backport policy here? I first ran into this issue back on Jethro (but that's a fair bit too far to expect a backport to) and I finally root

[linux-yocto] [kernel-cache][PATCH] netfilter: Enable CONFIG_NETFILTER_XT_TARGET_LOG

tions") Signed-off-by: Tom Rini --- features/netfilter/netfilter.cfg | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/features/netfilter/netfilter.cfg b/features/netfilter/netfilter.cfg index 6497b0ea7bfe..c1f8b83a38bd 100644 --- a/features/netfilter/netfilter.cfg +++ b/features/netfilter/net

Re: [yocto] How to create a signed bootloader and Linux kernel on a UEFI BIOS

On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 12:53:36PM +0100, Dominig ar Foll (Intel Open Source) wrote: > Hello, > > Securing the full boot chain on a UEFI BIOS such as those provided on > Intel platforms is possible but not that simple. > Working, detailed documentation is not easy to find anywhere. > > Some of

Re: [yocto] : [meta]: [recipes-bsp]: u-boot: update commit id to the latest one of u-boot upstream

On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 06:20:02PM +0800, meng...@windriver.com wrote: > From: Limeng > > Hi Richard, > > Could you please help to merge this patch into meta/recipes-bsp/u-boot, > branch is master? > > There are 2 CVE issues fixing in latest u-boot upstream, so > update commit id to involve

Re: [yocto] Building two initramfs images

On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 01:21:18PM +, Amol Lad wrote: > Hi, > > I want to build two initramfs images when building core-image-minimal. First > initramfs gets bundled with kernel and available after build. This is all > good. > > Now, how to include second initramfs image also in

Re: [yocto] Quick hack for compiling old and outdated YOCTO Jethro for Renesas iwg20m

On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 05:38:47PM +0100, Zoran Stojsavljevic wrote: > Hello, > > I have to do some job on the Renesas iwg20m platform. From this site: > https://elinux.org/RZ-G/Boards/Yocto_2.0 > > I found some explanation how to do YOCTO build, which I a bit modified > (conf/local.conf). > >

[yocto] [PATCH] dev-manual, ref-manual: Update for vmdk/vdi/qcow2/u-boot image changes

that is applied to wic images. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> --- Please note that while the u-boot image changes are live the vmdk/vdi/qcow2 portions are not yet merged. But given that they are user visible changes I promised to provide documentation updates

Re: [yocto] [PATCH] u-boot-rockchip: update require path

On Sat, Jul 22, 2017 at 06:40:32PM -0400, Trevor Woerner wrote: > The oe-core recipe was updated (2017.05 -> 2017.07), this recipe needed to > be updated to suit. However, this u-boot (from rockchip) is still at version > 2017.05. > > Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner Not an

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH] apparmor: Additional runtime fixes

nto...@iki.fi> Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> --- recipes-security/AppArmor/apparmor_2.11.0.bb | 6 +- recipes-security/AppArmor/files/apparmor | 30 +--- 2 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/recipes-secur

Re: [yocto] AppArmor

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 09:35:06PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 01:56:22PM +0300, Anders Montonen wrote: > > Hi Tom, > > > > On Thu, 22 Jun 2017, Tom Rini wrote: > > > > > >I did fix the latter of these (along with the perl problem),

Re: [yocto] AppArmor

On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 01:56:22PM +0300, Anders Montonen wrote: > Hi Tom, > > On Thu, 22 Jun 2017, Tom Rini wrote: > > > >I did fix the latter of these (along with the perl problem), but I'm > >using sysvinit and needed apache2 in my project anyhow. > > Your

Re: [yocto] AppArmor

On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 05:01:09AM +0300, Anders Montonen wrote: > On 21 Jun 2017, at 23:46, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 9:56 AM Anders Montonen > > wrote: > > Has anyone tried using AppArmor with Yocto?

Re: [yocto] AppArmor

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 04:19:24PM +0300, Anders Montonen wrote: > Hi, > > Has anyone tried using AppArmor with Yocto? The recipe in the > meta-security layer is broken, and when fixed so it actually builds, > it turns out the installed init script relies on functions not found > in Yocto's

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH] sdcard_image-rpi.bbclass: deploy vfat partition

On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 06:05:07PM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 12:12 PM, Matthew McClintock > wrote: > > This is useful to update the bootloader/vfat partition from u-boot when > > you don't want to update everything: > > > > U-Boot> tftpboot 0x100

[yocto] [meta-security][PATCH] apparmor: Rework such that the utilities are functional by default

PACKAGECONFIG knobs as the majority of the userspace tools are python3 based, and the few that aren't that nor C based are perl based. - Because of the above we must drop the -python package because it's required for the utilities in the main package. Signed-off-by: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] u-boot-rockchip: fix for binutils-2.28

On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 03:42:00PM -0800, Khem Raj wrote: > On 17-03-08 18:28:21, Tom Rini wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 12:31:47PM -0500, Trevor Woerner wrote: > > > > > openembedded-core updated bintuils from 2.27 to 2.28 which causes u-boot > &

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] u-boot-rockchip: fix for binutils-2.28

On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 12:31:47PM -0500, Trevor Woerner wrote: > openembedded-core updated bintuils from 2.27 to 2.28 which causes u-boot to > fail to compile: > > arm-oe-linux-gnueabi-ld.bfd: u-boot: Not enough room for program > headers, try linking with -N > > Building with -N does

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH v4] u-boot: Simplify boot script

u <net...@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> -- Tom -- ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto

Re: [yocto] [meta-raspberrypi][PATCH v3] u-boot: Simplify boot script

On Sat, Nov 05, 2016 at 12:50:07PM +1100, Jonathan Liu wrote: [snip] > +++ b/recipes-bsp/u-boot/files/rpi-fdt-addr.patch > @@ -0,0 +1,77 @@ > +From 0bb380da174f9372a706b5a4914a4c06ad7fbfdf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > +From: Jonathan Liu > +Date: Sat, 5 Nov 2016 12:43:47 +1100 >

Re: [yocto] Meta layer for pine64

On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 11:39:48AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 2:01 PM, Mont3z Claros > wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I just finished a first beta version of a meta layer for SBC pine64. > > You can find it in https://github.com/mont3z/meta-pine64 > >

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 6 Recipes

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 02:01:31PM -0400, Tom Rini wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:01:34AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:08:46AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > >&g

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 6 Recipes

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:08:46AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > > > On Apr 27, 2016, at 3:10 PM, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > > > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:53:52AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > >> thanks I think most of them come to these categor

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 6 Recipes

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 10:53:52AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > thanks I think most of them come to these categories. So any help in > fixing them is welcome. > > 1. kernel older than 4.4, backport needed fixed into these branches or > move to newer kernels. > 2. uboot dont have gcc6 compiler header

Re: [yocto] [OE-core] [RFT] GCC 6 Recipes

On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 07:01:34AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 12:08:46AM -0700, Khem Raj wrote: > >> > >> > On Apr 27, 2016, at 3:10 PM, Tom Rini <tr...@konsulko.c

Re: [yocto] Location of U-Boot environment for BeagleBone Black

On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 05:10:21PM +1000, Craig McQueen wrote: I'm building Yocto for BeagleBone using the meta-ti layer and the kernel and U-Boot provided by that layer. I'm having some trouble understanding the location where U-Boot saves its environment for BeagleBone Black. After

Re: [yocto] denx.de site down?

On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 09:00:44PM +0400, Elvis Dowson wrote: Hi Wolfgang, I noticed that your site has been down since yesterday? I usually sync with your u-boot and eldk repositories, and during the yocto build process, it failed because your site was un-reachable.

Re: [yocto] Moving angstrom under the yocto banner

On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:32:27AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/03/2012 09:25 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:01:01AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Clear reproducible testing results.

Re: [yocto] Moving angstrom under the yocto banner

On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 10:08:44AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/03/2012 09:44 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 09:32:27AM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 04/03/2012 09:25 AM, Martin

Re: [yocto] Moving angstrom under the yocto banner

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 07:27:16PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: [snip] You've mentioned preferring to do this with set versions of bitbake and oe-core. Do oe-core and bitbake maintain stable branches? I didn't think they did. This makes it difficult to stabilize a release, and poky serves this

Re: [yocto] Moving angstrom under the yocto banner

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 03:18:06PM -0500, Mark Hatle wrote: On 3/30/12 2:33 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 30 mrt. 2012, om 12:26 heeft Mark Hatle het volgende geschreven: On 3/30/12 1:44 PM, Koen Kooi wrote: Hi, RP said I should raise this on the yocto lists, so here it is: The Angstrom

Re: [yocto] Moving angstrom under the yocto banner

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 04:09:37PM -0700, Chris Larson wrote: On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Stewart, David C david.c.stew...@intel.com wrote: From: yocto-boun...@yoctoproject.org [mailto:yocto- boun...@yoctoproject.org] On Behalf Of Richard Purdie Sent: Friday, March 30, 2012 2:11 PM

Re: [yocto] Moving angstrom under the yocto banner

On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:06:04PM +, Stewart, David C wrote: Finally, Dr. Kooi has stated that he doesn't see YP as an upstream. In fact, many of the OSVs (like Wind River, Mentor Graphics and now ENEA - yeah!) absolutely want to use YP as their upstream. So I'm hoping we could change

[yocto] [meta-intel][PATCH v2] ia32-base.inc: Use '=+' for IMAGE_FSTYPES

As per http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2012-March/020053.html a machine conf file should use '=+' to set IMAGE_FSTYPES. Cc: Kishore Bodke kishore.k.bo...@intel.com Cc: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com Cc: Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Tom Rini tr

[yocto] [PATCH] ia32-base.inc: Use '=' for IMAGE_FSTYPES

As per http://lists.linuxtogo.org/pipermail/openembedded-core/2012-March/019772.html a machine conf file should use '=' to set IMAGE_FSTYPES. Cc: Kishore Bodke kishore.k.bo...@intel.com Cc: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com Cc: Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Tom Rini tr

Re: [yocto] New ways of keeping up with the status of the build.

On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Flanagan, Elizabeth elizabeth.flana...@intel.com wrote: I've implemented two new ways of keeping up with the yocto autobuilder's build status (other than the obvious way of looking at autobuilder.yoctoproject.org:8010 of course) First is through the

Re: [yocto] New ways of keeping up with the status of the build.

On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 12:10 PM, Darren Hart darren.h...@intel.com wrote: On 11/09/2011 08:00 AM, Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Flanagan, Elizabeth elizabeth.flana...@intel.com wrote: I've implemented two new ways of keeping up with the yocto autobuilder's build status

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 1/1] beagleboard: enable hard floating point abi

On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote: On 08/23/2011 08:34 AM, Tom Rini wrote: On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 8:31 AM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote: On 08/23/2011 05:38 AM, Koen Kooi wrote: Op 20 aug. 2011, om 00:23 heeft Darren Hart het volgende

Re: [yocto] way to get a package list?

On Fri, Aug 5, 2011 at 3:02 PM, Richard Purdie richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: On Fri, 2011-08-05 at 16:55 -0500, Kumar Gala wrote: Is there some command to get the set of packages that will be attempted to be built? bitbake -g will dump out a task-depends.dot file which shows

Re: [yocto] [oe] Collab Summit + ELC + TSC Meeting

people can be in San Francisco over the weekend of April 9-10? TSC people, go ahead and chime in for completeness. I'm going just for the Sunday bit. -- Tom Rini Mentor Graphics Corporation ___ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https