Paul, It's a great point. I have volunteered Mentor's teleconference, but the onsite pickup is always a challenge. Once we've finalized the location, I'll focus on making sure that we have a high quality pickup(s) in the room. If possible, I'll get a true video-conference setup.
-- Sean > -----Original Message----- > From: openembedded-architecture-boun...@lists.openembedded.org > [mailto:openembedded-architecture-boun...@lists.openembedded.org] On > Behalf Of Paul Eggleton > Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2017 07:47 PM > To: Philip Balister <phi...@balister.org> > Cc: yocto@yoctoproject.org; openembedded- > memb...@lists.openembedded.org; openembedded-architecture > <openembedded-architect...@lists.openembedded.org>; openembedded- > de...@lists.openembedded.org; openembedded-core <openembedded- > c...@lists.openembedded.org> > Subject: Re: [Openembedded-architecture] [yocto] OpenEmbedded Developers > Meeting in Portland before ELC > > On Mon, 09 Jan 2017 16:04:57 Philip Balister wrote: > > As we do around each Embedded Linux Conference, OpenEmbedded will > host a > > developer meeting to discuss the state of OpenEmbedded and what efforts > > we should focus on over the next six months or so. > > > > All developers and users are welcome to attend. We like to hear feedback > > from a variety of people over what works, doesn't work, and is useful to > > people using OpenEmbedded for all sort of applications. > > > > The meeting will be held Monday, Feb 20 at a location we can almost > > announce. Based on prior years, the meeting will run from 9AM to 5PM. > > > > If you are going to attend add your name to: > > > > http://openembedded.org/wiki/OEDAM_2017 > > > > Also, go ahead and add ideas for the agenda. We'll organize them better > > just before the actual meeting. > > So it's great that this is happening, but unfortunately I'm not going to be > able to make it to this one, and I suspect there will be many others who would > like to participate but can't be present in person. In previous meetings we > have really struggled with practical means for remote participation. I don't > expect effective real-time two-way communication, but last time the audio > was > so poor I wasn't even able to hear what was being said. > > Is there a chance that given advance notice we will be able to set something > up that could improve this? > > Cheers, > Paul > > -- > > Paul Eggleton > Intel Open Source Technology Centre > _______________________________________________ > Openembedded-architecture mailing list > openembedded-architect...@lists.openembedded.org > http://lists.openembedded.org/mailman/listinfo/openembedded-architecture -- _______________________________________________ yocto mailing list yocto@yoctoproject.org https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
