On 07/19/2011 08:40 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jul 19, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
On 07/19/2011 06:17 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jul 19, 2011, at 2:44 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 19 jul 2011, om 07:21 heeft Kumar Gala het volgende geschreven:
The majority of support for the PowerPC e50
On Jul 19, 2011, at 10:32 AM, Saul Wold wrote:
> On 07/19/2011 06:17 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
>>
>> On Jul 19, 2011, at 2:44 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Op 19 jul 2011, om 07:21 heeft Kumar Gala het volgende geschreven:
>>>
The majority of support for the PowerPC e500v2/SPE target alrea
On 07/19/2011 06:17 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
On Jul 19, 2011, at 2:44 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
Op 19 jul 2011, om 07:21 heeft Kumar Gala het volgende geschreven:
The majority of support for the PowerPC e500v2/SPE target already
exists. However some minor cleans are required to get things working
On Jul 19, 2011, at 2:44 AM, Koen Kooi wrote:
>
> Op 19 jul 2011, om 07:21 heeft Kumar Gala het volgende geschreven:
>
>> The majority of support for the PowerPC e500v2/SPE target already
>> exists. However some minor cleans are required to get things working
>> completely.
>>
>> The e500v2 u
Op 19 jul 2011, om 07:21 heeft Kumar Gala het volgende geschreven:
> The majority of support for the PowerPC e500v2/SPE target already
> exists. However some minor cleans are required to get things working
> completely.
>
> The e500v2 utilizes a unique floating point programming model / ABI fro
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 10:21 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> The majority of support for the PowerPC e500v2/SPE target already
> exists. However some minor cleans are required to get things working
> completely.
>
> The e500v2 utilizes a unique floating point programming model / ABI from
> other PowerPC
The majority of support for the PowerPC e500v2/SPE target already
exists. However some minor cleans are required to get things working
completely.
The e500v2 utilizes a unique floating point programming model / ABI from
other PowerPC targets and thus requires special handling.
- k
__