On 05/10/2012 06:00 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com
Refactor bsp/common-pc/common-pc* to keep hardware-related options in
oops ^
the base crownbay.scc while moving the more 'policy'-related options
into the files that include the
On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 09:18 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
On 05/10/2012 06:00 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com
Refactor bsp/common-pc/common-pc* to keep hardware-related options in
oops ^
the base crownbay.scc while moving the
On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 17:08 -0500, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 09:18 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
On 05/10/2012 06:00 PM, tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com
Refactor bsp/common-pc/common-pc* to keep hardware-related options in
oops
On 05/11/2012 03:08 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 09:18 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
Independent from this patch, but does crownbay have all three? ehci and
ohci seems a lot more likely to me.
lsusb shows ehci and ohci, but why did you think ohci would be more
likely?
Tom
On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 15:35 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
On 05/11/2012 03:08 PM, Tom Zanussi wrote:
On Fri, 2012-05-11 at 09:18 -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
Independent from this patch, but does crownbay have all three? ehci and
ohci seems a lot more likely to me.
lsusb shows ehci and
From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com
Refactor bsp/common-pc/common-pc* to keep hardware-related options in
the base crownbay.scc while moving the more 'policy'-related options
into the files that include the base crownbay.scc fragment.
This allows the different kernel types to make use of the
