Re: [yocto] [RFC][meta-gplv2] layer priority and worth creating branch compatible with morty?

You're right, after fixing our tooling to correctly override BBFILE_PRIORITY based on priorities in layer list I'm seeing such issue.e.g. gstreamer failing with: | autopoint: *** The AM_GNU_GETTEXT_VERSION declaration in your configure.ac file requires the infrastructure from

Re: [yocto] [RFC][meta-gplv2] layer priority and worth creating branch compatible with morty?

On Fri, Apr 21, 2017 at 1:59 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: > 1) layer priority, currently it has: >BBFILE_PRIORITY_gplv2 = "1" >which is lower than oe-core with: >BBFILE_PRIORITY_core = "5" >so in order to use recipes from meta-gplv2 layer, user has to

[yocto] [RFC][meta-gplv2] layer priority and worth creating branch compatible with morty?

1) layer priority, currently it has: BBFILE_PRIORITY_gplv2 = "1" which is lower than oe-core with: BBFILE_PRIORITY_core = "5" so in order to use recipes from meta-gplv2 layer, user has to add couple PREFERRED_VERSIONS. Was this intended use for meta-gplv2? I can see some