Re: [yocto] Busybox still old version: Still looking for a clear understanding of an old mystery.

2013-03-07 Thread Paul Eggleton
On Tuesday 15 January 2013 15:28:25 Rudolf Streif wrote: What are you exactly referring to as new version? The package version that bitbake builds is defined by the recipe, through the version designation in the recipe's file name or through explicitly setting PV. I think what you are trying

Re: [yocto] Busybox still old version: Still looking for a clear understanding of an old mystery.

2013-01-16 Thread Autif Khan
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 6:57 PM, Brian Smucker b...@bsmucker.eu.org wrote: Hi Rudolf, On 1/15/2013 3:28 PM, Rudolf Streif wrote: Brian, What are you exactly referring to as new version? The package version that bitbake builds is defined by the recipe, through the version designation in

Re: [yocto] Busybox still old version: Still looking for a clear understanding of an old mystery.

2013-01-16 Thread Brian Smucker
Hi, The version of busybox is the same. I've just temporarily done a bitbake -c menuconfig to change one of the options, recompiled using the custom config that's generated, and now I want to force its inclusion into core-image-minimal. Thanks, Brian On 1/16/2013 6:13 AM, Autif Khan

Re: [yocto] Busybox still old version: Still looking for a clear understanding of an old mystery.

2013-01-16 Thread Autif Khan
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 10:23 AM, Brian Smucker b...@bsmucker.eu.org wrote: Hi, The version of busybox is the same. I've just temporarily done a bitbake -c menuconfig to change one of the options, recompiled using the custom config that's generated, and now I want to force its inclusion into

[yocto] Busybox still old version: Still looking for a clear understanding of an old mystery.

2013-01-15 Thread Brian Smucker
Hello All, I'm a relative newbie to yocto/oe, but have got a ways down the road to understanding, but the gaps in my understanding cause me great grief at times. I think this probably is a simple question, but somehow I'm doing something wrong. I recompile busybox with a new config:

Re: [yocto] Busybox still old version: Still looking for a clear understanding of an old mystery.

2013-01-15 Thread Rudolf Streif
Brian, What are you exactly referring to as new version? The package version that bitbake builds is defined by the recipe, through the version designation in the recipe's file name or through explicitly setting PV. I think what you are trying to do is to modify the busybox configuration and then

Re: [yocto] Busybox still old version: Still looking for a clear understanding of an old mystery.

2013-01-15 Thread Brian Smucker
Hi Rudolf, On 1/15/2013 3:28 PM, Rudolf Streif wrote: Brian, What are you exactly referring to as new version? The package version that bitbake builds is defined by the recipe, through the version designation in the recipe's file name or through explicitly setting PV. I think what you