On Monday, March 14, 2016 04:38:35 PM K Richard Pixley wrote:
>
> What stops us from building different boot labels for different images?
> That seems like the obvious choice. Or perhaps, using "boot" for all
> syslinux images and adding "install" for "live" images.
Fair question. Nothing
On 3/14/16 15:58 , Rudolf Streif wrote:
Richard,
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 1:55 PM, K Richard Pixley > wrote:
If I add that line, (
IMAGE_FSTYPES = "vmdk"
), to my local.conf, I get:
rich@burgess> time bitbake core-image-minimal
Richard,
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 1:55 PM, K Richard Pixley wrote:
> If I add that line, (
>
> IMAGE_FSTYPES = "vmdk"
>
> ), to my local.conf, I get:
>
> rich@burgess> time bitbake core-image-minimal
> ERROR: OE-core's config sanity checker detected a potential
>
If I add that line, (
IMAGE_FSTYPES = "vmdk"
), to my local.conf, I get:
rich@burgess> time bitbake core-image-minimal
ERROR: OE-core's config sanity checker detected a potential
misconfiguration.
Either fix the cause of this error or at your own risk disable
the checker
> While we're on it...
>
> Can anyone explain what a "live" image is intended to be?
>
> (I haven't gotten a live image to "work", but I'm not entirely
> sure I know what "work" means for a live image.)
>
> Or how hdddirect is intended to be different
On 3/14/16 10:16 , Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:11 AM, K Richard Pixley wrote:
While we're on it...
Can anyone explain what a "live" image is intended to be?
it can either boot from the disk or you can run the installer to
install it to another media on your
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 10:11 AM, K Richard Pixley wrote:
> While we're on it...
>
> Can anyone explain what a "live" image is intended to be?
it can either boot from the disk or you can run the installer to
install it to another media on your device.
>
> (I haven't gotten a live
While we're on it...
Can anyone explain what a "live" image is intended to be?
(I haven't gotten a live image to "work", but I'm not entirely sure I
know what "work" means for a live image.)
Or how hdddirect is intended to be different from hddimg?
--rich
--
> On Mar 14, 2016, at 10:01 AM, Gary Thomas wrote:
>
> On 03/14/2016 05:34 PM, K Richard Pixley wrote:
>> On 3/13/16 22:16 , Gary Thomas wrote:
>>> I'd like to to some testing that qemu just doesn't seem up to
>>> so I attempted to build a live ISO per the documentation. I
On 03/14/2016 05:34 PM, K Richard Pixley wrote:
On 3/13/16 22:16 , Gary Thomas wrote:
I'd like to to some testing that qemu just doesn't seem up to
so I attempted to build a live ISO per the documentation. I
added these lines to local.conf:
IMAGE_FSTYPES_genericx86 += "live"
On 3/13/16 22:16 , Gary Thomas wrote:
I'd like to to some testing that qemu just doesn't seem up to
so I attempted to build a live ISO per the documentation. I
added these lines to local.conf:
IMAGE_FSTYPES_genericx86 += "live"
NOISO_genericx86 = "0"
When I try to build core-image-base I
just use IMAGE_FSTYPES = "vmdk" if you plan to use virtualbox and need
a raw image.
On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 10:16 PM, Gary Thomas wrote:
> I'd like to to some testing that qemu just doesn't seem up to
> so I attempted to build a live ISO per the documentation. I
> added these
12 matches
Mail list logo