Re: [yocto] Question: xxxx listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to packaging errors

>> yes thats normal when package is re-used from sstate-cache Many thanks Khem. Got it, so the IPK packages were built early is OK. I did a clean all and redo the bitbake, all packages, images were rebuilt. Thanks again, —Dinh > >> On Oct 5, 2016, at 11:43 AM, Dinh Nguyen (dinhn)

Re: [yocto] Question: xxxx listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to packaging errors

> On Oct 5, 2016, at 11:43 AM, Dinh Nguyen (dinhn) wrote: > > > >>> then it is just going to reuse the build artifacts from last builds and not >>> checkout the sources etc. >>> all those tasks will be skipped. > >>> why are looking for sources in a build tree ? > > > Not

Re: [yocto] Question: xxxx listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to packaging errors

>> then it is just going to reuse the build artifacts from last builds and not >> checkout the sources etc. >> all those tasks will be skipped. >> why are looking for sources in a build tree ? Not only source under .. yp/tmp/work/core2-64-poky-linux/c-mlib/1.1-r0/git But other data such

Re: [yocto] Question: xxxx listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to packaging errors

> On Oct 5, 2016, at 11:18 AM, Dinh Nguyen (dinhn) wrote: > >>> Are the files present in the image/packages? Maybe it is just the >>> bitbake cache skipping doing work it already did last time. > > If I don’t do the bitbake clean, and just do bitbake again, then yes. > > >

Re: [yocto] Question: xxxx listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to packaging errors

>> Are the files present in the image/packages? Maybe it is just the >> bitbake cache skipping doing work it already did last time. If I don’t do the bitbake clean, and just do bitbake again, then yes. But if I do “bitbake -c clean c-mlib” and bitbake again, the is where the problem.

Re: [yocto] Question: xxxx listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to packaging errors

Thanks Khem >> I guess its getting renamed as per debian package renaming rules. Just add >> ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN} = "1" I added ALLOW_EMPTY_${PN} = “1” And encountered the same issue as specified in previous mail. For the very first time after adding it, everything went well, including the -dev,

Re: [yocto] Question: xxxx listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to packaging errors

>> Is that doing a compile in the install target? Yes Len. Compile was done and there is no issue there. Thanks, —Dinh On 10/5/16, 9:28 AM, "Lennart Sorensen" wrote: >On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 04:10:01PM +, Dinh Nguyen (dinhn) wrote: >> >>> I wonder

Re: [yocto] Question: xxxx listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to packaging errors

On Wed, Oct 5, 2016 at 9:06 AM, Dinh Nguyen (dinhn) wrote: > Many thanks Paul. Your help is greatly appreciated. > > 1. >>> Like the other responder I would suggest you not set PACKAGES > > Yes, I did not set the PACKAGES, so -dev, -dbg and main packages were built > as shown

Re: [yocto] Question: xxxx listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to packaging errors

On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 04:06:25PM +, Dinh Nguyen (dinhn) wrote: > Many thanks Paul. Your help is greatly appreciated. > > 1. >>> Like the other responder I would suggest you not set PACKAGES > > Yes, I did not set the PACKAGES, so -dev, -dbg and main packages were built > as shown below: >

Re: [yocto] Question: xxxx listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to packaging errors

On Wed, Oct 05, 2016 at 04:10:01PM +, Dinh Nguyen (dinhn) wrote: > >>> I wonder why do we want to override default PACKAGES here. If we can > >>> leave that alone things would work out on its own. > > I did remove the PACKAGES setting in my .bb — so all default packages were > built. But

Re: [yocto] Question: xxxx listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to packaging errors

>>> I wonder why do we want to override default PACKAGES here. If we can leave >>> that alone things would work out on its own. I did remove the PACKAGES setting in my .bb — so all default packages were built. But still having some other issue as stated in other emails. Thanks Khem. —Dinh

Re: [yocto] Question: xxxx listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to packaging errors

Many thanks Paul. Your help is greatly appreciated. 1. >>> Like the other responder I would suggest you not set PACKAGES Yes, I did not set the PACKAGES, so -dev, -dbg and main packages were built as shown below: dinhn@rs-bldsrv:/media/raghuram/data/dinhn/ioxDevLatest/ioxsdk/yp$ find

Re: [yocto] Question: xxxx listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to packaging errors

I wonder why do we want to override default PACKAGES here. If we can leave that alone things would work out on its own. On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:55 PM, Paul Eggleton wrote: > On Wed, 05 Oct 2016 05:12:27 Dinh Nguyen wrote: >> Thanks much Paul. >> >> PACKAGES

Re: [yocto] Question: xxxx listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to packaging errors

On Wed, 05 Oct 2016 05:12:27 Dinh Nguyen wrote: > Thanks much Paul. > > PACKAGES = "${PN}" should work > > It solved the early error “ c-mlib listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this > leads to packaging errors” — Thanks again. > > > But running into other issue. Below is my do_install >

Re: [yocto] Question: xxxx listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to packaging errors

Thank you Len. If I specified PACKAGES = “${PN}” as mentioned early, it only built the main package. As you suggested, I removed that line from my c-mlib.bb, it then built the main, -dev and -dbg packages as specified in the bitbake.conf - thanks you...

Re: [yocto] Question: xxxx listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to packaging errors

Thanks much Paul. PACKAGES = "${PN}" should work It solved the early error “ c-mlib listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to packaging errors” — Thanks again. But running into other issue. Below is my do_install do_install () { oe_runmake all install -d

Re: [yocto] Question: xxxx listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to packaging errors

On Tue, Oct 04, 2016 at 07:47:58PM +, Dinh Nguyen (dinhn) wrote: > > Hi Paul, thanks much for prompt response. > > The c-mlib.bb below has the packages var as > PACKAGES =+ "${PN}” I also tried PACKAGES = "${PN}” Don't do that. In bitbake.conf you have: PACKAGES = "${PN}-dbg

Re: [yocto] Question: xxxx listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to packaging errors

On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 19:47:58 Dinh Nguyen wrote: > The c-mlib.bb below has the packages var as > PACKAGES =+ "${PN}” I also tried PACKAGES = "${PN}” PACKAGES = "${PN}" should work (or use bitbake -e recipename | less, search for ^PACKAGES= (with /) and look through the history to see why not).

Re: [yocto] Question: xxxx listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to packaging errors

Hi Paul, thanks much for prompt response. The c-mlib.bb below has the packages var as PACKAGES =+ "${PN}” I also tried PACKAGES = "${PN}” The packages were built successful indeed, but the ERROR: QA Issue ... Any recommendation to change the above PACKAGES variable in the bb? SUMMARY =

Re: [yocto] Question: xxxx listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to packaging errors

Hi Dinh, On Tue, 04 Oct 2016 16:07:59 Dinh Nguyen wrote: > >>> ERROR: QA Issue: c-mlib is listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads > >>> to packaging errors. [packages-list] > Summary: There was 1 ERROR > >>> message shown, returning a non-zero exit code. > > I got the above ERROR because

[yocto] Question: xxxx listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to packaging errors

Hi folks, >>> ERROR: QA Issue: c-mlib is listed in PACKAGES multiple times, this leads to >>> packaging errors. [packages-list] >>> Summary: There was 1 ERROR message shown, returning a non-zero exit code. I got the above ERROR because my c-mlib_1.0-r0_core2-64.ipk and other packages were