[yocto] are there any more obvious candidates for ASSUME_PROVIDED?

2014-07-25 Thread Robert P. J. Day
asked about this once upon a time ... are there any other possibilities for adding to ASSUME_PROVIDED in local.conf.sample, given that there are surely more native utilities that are fairly safe by now? for example, it's still weird that current default ASSUME_PROVIDED includes bzip2 but not

Re: [yocto] are there any more obvious candidates for ASSUME_PROVIDED?

2014-07-25 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 5:39 AM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: asked about this once upon a time ... are there any other possibilities for adding to ASSUME_PROVIDED in local.conf.sample, given that there are surely more native utilities that are fairly safe by now? for

Re: [yocto] are there any more obvious candidates for ASSUME_PROVIDED?

2014-07-25 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014, Khem Raj wrote: On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 5:39 AM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: asked about this once upon a time ... are there any other possibilities for adding to ASSUME_PROVIDED in local.conf.sample, given that there are surely more native

Re: [yocto] are there any more obvious candidates for ASSUME_PROVIDED?

2014-07-25 Thread Khem Raj
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: fair enough, but what about the simpler example of gzip as opposed to bzip2? it's just trying to understand what makes the list and what doesn't. gzip can be replaced by pigz and it can be used to provide

Re: [yocto] are there any more obvious candidates for ASSUME_PROVIDED?

2014-07-25 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Fri, 25 Jul 2014, Khem Raj wrote: On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: fair enough, but what about the simpler example of gzip as opposed to bzip2? it's just trying to understand what makes the list and what doesn't. gzip can be replaced