Hi Saul
On 19/10/12 19:01, Saul Wold wrote:
My apologies, I updated the MAINTAINER and README files.
Thanks.
(I am delighted Intel is finding Guacamayo useful, but the obliteration
of the history makes it look as if the credit for this official Yocto
layer goes to Intel; I am sure that was
On 20/10/12 13:16, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Friday 19 October 2012 11:01:09 Saul Wold wrote:
Long term however I'd rather see the additional unique recipes in meta-
guacamayo itself go into more official OE community layers.
Ah, so there is an official community and an unoffical one, this
On Monday 22 October 2012 09:06:41 Tomas Frydrych wrote:
On 20/10/12 13:16, Paul Eggleton wrote:
On Friday 19 October 2012 11:01:09 Saul Wold wrote:
Long term however I'd rather see the additional unique recipes in meta-
guacamayo itself go into more official OE community layers.
Ah, so
On Friday 19 October 2012 11:01:09 Saul Wold wrote:
On 10/19/2012 07:33 AM, Tomas Frydrych wrote:
(I am delighted Intel is finding Guacamayo useful, but the obliteration
of the history makes it look as if the credit for this official Yocto
layer goes to Intel; I am sure that was not
On Saturday, 20 October 2012 at 13:16, Paul Eggleton wrote:
Long term however I'd rather see the additional unique recipes in meta-
guacamayo itself go into more official OE community layers. meta-dlna would
continue to take them from there using combo-layer though I suspect. (This is
the plan
Looking over meta-dlna in Yocto git I see it's little more than a fork
of meta-guacamayo from guacamayo-project.org -- could someone please
explain to me why the git history was stripped out from this 'combo' layer?
(I am delighted Intel is finding Guacamayo useful, but the obliteration
of the
