Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH v4 1/3] NanoPi-M4: let all variants use the same KMACHINE type

On Mon 2021-04-26 @ 04:58:08 PM, yann.dir...@blade-group.com wrote: > From: Yann Dirson > > This will allow us to define a single set of kernel BSP for all > variants of the board (which only need to differ in u-boot dts). > > Signed-off-by: Yann Dirson applied to master, thanks!

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH v4 2/3] NanoPi-M4: declare "usbhost" and "serial" in MACHINE_FEATURES

On Mon 2021-04-26 @ 04:58:09 PM, yann.dir...@blade-group.com wrote: > From: Yann Dirson > > Signed-off-by: Yann Dirson applied to master, thanks! -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#53372):

[yocto] Yocto Technical Team Minutes, Engineering Sync, for May 4, 2021

Yocto Technical Team Minutes, Engineering Sync, for May 4, 2021 archive: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ly8nyhO14kDNnFcW2QskANXW3ZT7QwKC5wWVDg9dDH4/edit == announcements == The upcoming Yocto Project Summit is taking place May 25-26 2021 details:

[yocto] what OE/YP layers should be considered "supported"?

related to something that richard purdie mentioned on the OE list, if one wanted to do a YP-wide "cleanup" of some indeterminate form, what are the layers that would be considered mandatory to cover in such a cleanup? no-brainers would, of course, include: * oe-core * meta-openembedded

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH v4 3/3] linux-yocto: add an initial NanoPi-M4 BSP

On Mon 2021-04-26 @ 04:58:10 PM, yann.dir...@blade-group.com wrote: > From: Yann Dirson > > This patch provides "standard" and "tiny" BSP. > > There is still much work to be done in dispatching feature to individual > scc files - the more boards we can support the better it will get. > Not all

Re: [yocto] [meta-zephyr][PATCH] CI: add Gitlab CI support

Please disregard, sloppy scripting bit me On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 4:53 PM Jon Mason via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Jon Mason > --- > .gitlab-ci.yml| 174 ++ > ci/96b-avenger96.yml | 9 + >

[yocto] [meta-zephyr][PATCH] CI: add Gitlab CI support

Signed-off-by: Jon Mason --- .gitlab-ci.yml| 174 ++ ci/96b-avenger96.yml | 9 + ci/96b-nitrogen.yml | 6 + ci/acrn.yml | 6 + ci/base.yml

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH v4 3/3] linux-yocto: add an initial NanoPi-M4 BSP

Le mar. 4 mai 2021 à 23:03, Trevor Woerner a écrit : > > On Mon 2021-04-26 @ 04:58:10 PM, yann.dir...@blade-group.com wrote: > > From: Yann Dirson > > > > This patch provides "standard" and "tiny" BSP. > > > > There is still much work to be done in dispatching feature to individual > > scc files

Re: [yocto] #yocto cmake configurations

Attached... From: Khem Raj Sent: Tuesday, May 4, 2021 2:36 PM To: Monsees, Steven C (US) Cc: yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [yocto] #yocto cmake configurations External Email Alert This email has been sent from an account outside of the BAE Systems network. Please treat the email

[yocto] [meta-zephyr][PATCH] CI: add Gitlab CI support

Signed-off-by: Jon Mason --- .gitlab-ci.yml| 174 ++ ci/96b-avenger96.yml | 9 + ci/96b-nitrogen.yml | 6 + ci/acrn.yml | 6 + ci/base.yml

Re: [yocto] #yocto cmake configurations

I see its using -rdynamic -static so next question is that do you have .a files in your sdk ? On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 12:57 PM Monsees, Steven C (US) via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > > > Attached… > > > > *From:* Khem Raj > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 4, 2021 2:36 PM > *To:* Monsees, Steven C (US)

Re: [yocto] #yocto cmake configurations

Yes, LLVM & Clang... From: Khem Raj Sent: Tuesday, May 4, 2021 5:17 PM To: Monsees, Steven C (US) Cc: yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [yocto] #yocto cmake configurations External Email Alert This email has been sent from an account outside of the BAE Systems network. Please treat

Re: [OE-core] [yocto] Yocto Project Status WW18`21

On Tue, 2021-05-04 at 18:38 +0200, Alexander Kanavin wrote: > On Tue, 4 May 2021 at 16:46, Stephen Jolley wrote: > > We are pleased to announce that our April 2022 release (potentially 3.5) > > will  > > be the next LTS as per our original two year schedule. If there are > > features  > >

Re: [yocto] what OE/YP layers should be considered "supported"?

Helllo Robert, On 5/4/21 2:03 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > related to something that richard purdie mentioned on the OE list, > if one wanted to do a YP-wide "cleanup" of some indeterminate form, > what are the layers that would be considered mandatory to cover in > such a cleanup? I don't

Re: [yocto] #yocto cmake configurations

the cmd seems to pass --sysroot correctly so can you search in SDK sysroot if you have libclang.a libdrm_intel.a and libdrm.a ? On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 3:20 PM Monsees, Steven C (US) via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > Yes, LLVM & Clang… > > > > *From:* Khem Raj > *Sent:* Tuesday, May 4, 2021

[yocto] Hardknott - pseudo excluded from intercept_scripts

I was attempting an image build with Yocto Hardknott, and I ran into a chown problem during do_rootfs(). I traced it down to ${WORKDIR}/intercept_scripts showing up in the PSEUDO_IGNORE_PATHS environment variable. This commit made the change:

Re: [yocto] looking for a bit more info on licensing certain recipe files

On Tue, 4 May 2021, Quentin Schulz wrote: > Hi Robert, > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 08:41:25AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > for the first time, i'm digging around in the docs for how to > > properly license various types of recipes, so a couple simple > > questions to start with, at

Re: [yocto] looking for a bit more info on licensing certain recipe files

Hi Robert, On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 08:41:25AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > for the first time, i'm digging around in the docs for how to > properly license various types of recipes, so a couple simple > questions to start with, at least so i can make a first pass of > cleaning up some

Re: [yocto] SSH_AUTH_SOCK unavailable when pulling modules #golang

On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 11:25:09AM -0700, Sven via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > Hi, > > I have put together a recipe inheriting from go-mod. This project depends on > out-of-repo modules that sit in private repos. As long as the SSH key > required to pull the requirements is present as a

Re: [yocto] looking for a bit more info on licensing certain recipe files

On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 06:00:10AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > On Tue, 4 May 2021, Quentin Schulz wrote: > > > Hi Robert, > > > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 08:41:25AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > > > for the first time, i'm digging around in the docs for how to > > > properly

Re: [yocto] Criteria for bitbake to skip recipes #bitbake

> > I wonder what are all possible criteria for Bitbake to decide to skip > > recipe (please compare to reports delivered by bitbake-layers). Recipe > > overlay, recipe version, others? Which knowledge source to find more > > details in? > > Maybe you can explain why you want to know why bitbake

Re: [yocto] looking for a bit more info on licensing certain recipe files

On Tue, 4 May 2021, Quentin Schulz wrote: > On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 06:00:10AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > On Tue, 4 May 2021, Quentin Schulz wrote: > > > > > Hi Robert, > > > > > > On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 08:41:25AM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote: > > > > > > > > for the first time, i'm

Re: [yocto] Yocto Project Status WW18`21

On Tue, 4 May 2021 at 16:46, Stephen Jolley wrote: > We are pleased to announce that our April 2022 release (potentially 3.5) > will be the next LTS as per our original two year schedule. If there are > features desired in the next LTS, now is the time to get them submitted and > stabilized

[yocto] Yocto Project Status WW18`21

Current Dev Position: YP 3.4 M1 Next Deadline: 7th June 2021 YP 3.4 M1 build Next Team Meetings: * Bug Triage meeting Thursday May 6th at 7:30am PDT ( https://zoom.us/j/454367603?pwd=ZGxoa2ZXL3FkM3Y0bFd5aVpHVVZ6dz09) *

[yocto] [meta-mingw] [PATCH] mingw-libgnurx: Add recipe

This implements glibc regex and will be used by many packages e.g. flex, therefore add recipe Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- ...onor-DESTDIR-variable-during-install.patch | 39 ++ .../0002-Add-autotool-files.patch | 125 ++

Re: [yocto] [meta-mingw] [PATCH] mingw-libgnurx: Add recipe

On 5/4/21 12:59 PM, Khem Raj wrote: This implements glibc regex and will be used by many packages e.g. flex, therefore add recipe Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- ...onor-DESTDIR-variable-during-install.patch | 39 ++ .../0002-Add-autotool-files.patch | 125 ++

[yocto] [meta-mingw] [PATCH v2] mingw-libgnurx: Add recipe

This implements glibc regex and will be used by many packages e.g. flex, therefore add recipe Signed-off-by: Khem Raj --- v2: Remove redundant comment ...onor-DESTDIR-variable-during-install.patch | 39 ++ .../0002-Add-autotool-files.patch | 125 ++

Re: [yocto] [meta-mingw] [PATCH] mingw-libgnurx: Add recipe

On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 11:06 AM Joshua Watt wrote: > > > On 5/4/21 12:59 PM, Khem Raj wrote: > > This implements glibc regex and will be used by many > > packages e.g. flex, therefore add recipe > > > > Signed-off-by: Khem Raj > > --- > > ...onor-DESTDIR-variable-during-install.patch | 39

Re: [yocto] #yocto cmake configurations

My standard zeus SDK appears to have an issue linking in my applications dynamic libs… /disk0/scratch/smonsees/sbcbSTD_SDK/limws/3.0.4/sysroots/x86_64-pokysdk-linux/usr/libexec/x86_64-poky-linux/gcc/x86_64-poky-linux/9.2.0/real-ld: cannot find -ldrm_intel

Re: [yocto] #yocto cmake configurations

can you post full linker cmd which is failing ? On Tue, May 4, 2021 at 11:24 AM Monsees, Steven C (US) via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > > > My standard zeus SDK appears to have an issue linking in my applications > dynamic libs… > > > >

[linux-yocto] [PATCH v5.10] net/dccp: make it depend on CONFIG_BROKEN (CVE-2020-16119)

There were some proposed fixes for this back in 2020, but the discussion largely fizzled out[1] and never got picked up again. We can see other distros are either blacklisting it from user space[2] or explicitly calling it out as "is not set" in their base config[3] but that really doesn't bind