Re: [yocto] [meta-zephyr][RFC][PATCH 0/6] Additional machines and removal of MACHINEOVERRIDES.

Thank you Eilís Ní Fhlannagáin. I faced failures, when I tried to build few recipes: (1) 'zephyr-lvgl' with 'nrf52840dk-nrf52840' machine. Error log: abi/zephyr-lvgl/2.7.1+gitAUTOINC+e4da3e5280_b0612c97c1-r0/recipe-sysroot-native/etc/quiltrc push', 0, 'stdout: Applying patch

Re: [yocto] [meta-zephyr][RFC][PATCH 0/6] Additional machines and removal of MACHINEOVERRIDES.

On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 at 09:36, Saini, Naveen Kumar wrote: > > Thank you Eilís Ní Fhlannagáin. > > I faced failures, when I tried to build few recipes: > > (1) 'zephyr-lvgl' with 'nrf52840dk-nrf52840' machine. > > Error log: >

Re: [yocto] rebuilding images

Do not remove sstate cache, it is there specifically so that you do not have to rebuild all the packages. Alex On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 at 14:13, Ivan Riabtsov wrote: > I build the image with the command > > #bitbake phytec-headless-image > > then I need to add something to the image and I do it

Re: [yocto] hosttools

On Mon, 2022-01-10 at 13:21 +, Monsees, Steven C (US) via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: >   > How does yocto determine the locations/paths to the “hosttools” ? >   > Is there precedence order established for locating the “hosttools” ?,  and > how would one update the search list so as to pick

[yocto] rebuilding images

I build the image with the command #bitbake phytec-headless-image then I need to add something to the image and I do it like this #rm -rf tmp sstate-cache deploy and #bitbake phytec-headless-image but this is too long, the question is: what to remove , so as not to rebuild all the packages,

[yocto] hosttools

How does yocto determine the locations/paths to the "hosttools" ? Is there precedence order established for locating the "hosttools" ?, and how would one update the search list so as to pick the tool from a different/specific location ? Thanks, Steve -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You

[yocto] Enhancements/Bugs closed WW02!

All, The below were the owners of enhancements or bugs closed during the last week! Who Count randy.macl...@windriver.com 4 st...@sakoman.com 1 alexandre.bell...@bootlin.com 1 richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org 1 jpewhac...@gmail.com 1 Grand Total 8 Thanks, Stephen K.

Re: [yocto] Problems switching from busybox-udhcpc to dhcpcd

All, I solved my problems. > -Original Message- > From: yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org On > Behalf Of Bryan Evenson via lists.yoctoproject.org > Sent: Thursday, January 6, 2022 9:32 AM > To: yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org > Subject: [yocto] Problems switching from busybox-udhcpc to dhcpcd >

[yocto] Current high bug count owners for Yocto Project 3.5

All, Below is the list as of top 45 bug owners as of the end of WW02 of who have open medium or higher bugs and enhancements against YP 3.5. There are 76 possible work days left until the final release candidates for YP 3.5 needs to be released. Who Count michael.opdenac...@bootlin.com 37

[yocto] M+ & H bugs with Milestone Movements WW02

All, YP M+ or high bugs which moved to a new milestone in WW02 are listed below: Priority Bug ID Short Description Changer Owner Was Became Medium+ 8191 apply kernel config fragments to arbitrary kernels

[yocto] Yocto Project Newcomer & Unassigned Bugs - Help Needed

All, The triage team is starting to try and collect up and classify bugs which a newcomer to the project would be able to work on in a way which means people can find them. They're being listed on the triage page under the appropriate heading:

[yocto] How to clean the cache for a package?

Hi, I'm new to yocto. I write a reciple for my own package. The source code of package is in my PC and maintained by GIT. When I change the source code of the package, I need to compile this package again with "bitbake -c clean package" and "bitbake -c compile package". However, even though I can

Re: [yocto] How to clean the cache for a package?

In theory, there's no need to run 'bitbake -c clean'. Did you update the SRCREV? It would be easier if you could share some info of your recipe. Regards, Qi -Original Message- From: yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org On Behalf Of Tony He Sent: Tuesday, January 11, 2022 2:12 PM To:

Re: [yocto] How to clean the cache for a package?

Thanks a lot. This is root cause. I did not update the SRCREV because I have not added this SRCREV in my recipe. Tony Chen, Qi 于2022年1月11日周二 14:28写道： > > In theory, there's no need to run 'bitbake -c clean'. Did you update the > SRCREV? It would be easier if you could share some info of your

Re: [yocto] rebuilding images

Ok, thanks. пн, 10 янв. 2022 г. в 16:16, Alexander Kanavin : > > Do not remove sstate cache, it is there specifically so that you do not have > to rebuild all the packages. > > Alex > > On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 at 14:13, Ivan Riabtsov wrote: >> >> I build the image with the command >> >> #bitbake

Re: [yocto] hosttools

Thank you, this explains/fixes an anomaly I saw while building under Jenkins... -Original Message- From: Richard Purdie Sent: Monday, January 10, 2022 8:43 AM To: Monsees, Steven C (US) ; yocto@lists.yoctoproject.org Subject: Re: [yocto] hosttools External Email Alert This email has

[yocto] [meta-zephyr][PATCH] west: Add west and python dependencies

From: Eilís Ní Fhlannagáin We will need west for a few things. First, west knows about all the boards supported, so for automatic machine generation, we will need to be able to run west boards. Secondly, I want to get rid of the dependance on MACHINEOVERRIDES in machine definition files. One

[yocto] [meta-zephyr][PATCH] Additional machines and removal of MACHINEOVERRIDES

From: Eilís Ní Fhlannagáin This set of patches relates to what I discussed at https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/55285. Four major issues (and one minor issue)are dealt with in this series. The first is a logical split of the meta-zephyr layer into a machine BSP layer and a

[yocto] [meta-zephyr][PATCH] zephyr-kernel-src-2.6.1: Add dtc patch.

From: Eilís Ní Fhlannagáin fd8bf397792d58280928d23686313a8da810485a should have also applied the dtc.patch to the 2.6.1 kernel. This commits applies it, so both 2.7.1 and 2.6.1 work. Signed-off-by: Eilís Ní Fhlannagáin --- .../recipes-kernel/zephyr-kernel/zephyr-kernel-src-2.6.1.inc | 1 +

[yocto] [meta-zephyr][PATCH] zephyr.bbclass: Remove need for MACHINEOVERRIDES for ZEPHYR_MODULES

From: Eilís Ní Fhlannagáin This commit removes the need for calling out ZEPHYR_MODULES via MACHINEOVERRIDES. It uses west list to figure out what ZEPHYR_MODULES are available and attaches them to -DZEPHYR_MODULES. Additional out of tree modules may be added via ZEPHYR_EXTRA_MODULES.

[yocto] [meta-zephyr][PATCH] meta-zephyr-core/bsp: Restructure into sublayers

From: Eilís Ní Fhlannagáin This commit restructures meta-zephyr into meta-zephyr-core and meta-zephyr-bsp. It moves machine definitions into meta-zephyr-bsp in preparation for adding the autogenerated zephyr machines. Signed-off-by: Eilís Ní Fhlannagáin --- README.txt

[yocto] [meta-zephyr][PATCH] README.txt: Document generate-zephyr-machine use

From: Eilís Ní Fhlannagáin This commit just adds some documentation on how to use the machine generation recipe. Signed-off-by: Eilís Ní Fhlannagáin --- README.txt | 16 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) diff --git a/README.txt b/README.txt index f3dda51..ec860fd 100644 ---

[yocto] [meta-zephyr][PATCH] zephyr-kernel: Modify recipes to work with new -DZEPHYR_MODULES

From: Eilís Ní Fhlannagáin Some of these recipes ended up overriding the ZEPHYR_MODULES we set elsewhere. As well, zephyr-lvgl tries to apply a patch we already apply. Signed-off-by: Eilís Ní Fhlannagáin --- .../zephyr-kernel/zephyr-coap-client.bb | 2 --

[yocto] [meta-zephyr][PATCH] zephyr-kernel-src: Add complete zephyr source

From: Eilís Ní Fhlannagáin Currently meta-zephyr only checks out a subset of the kernel source. With the addition of being able to generate machine configs from zephyr source, we need to be able to have the complete source if we don't want things to break badly. Signed-off-by: Eilís Ní

Re: [linux-yocto]: [rt-kernel v5.10/standard/preempt-rt/intel-sdk-5.10/intel-socfpga]: intel-socfpga: upgrade kernel patches for stratix10 platform

In message: [linux-yocto]: [rt-kernel v5.10/standard/preempt-rt/intel-sdk-5.10/intel-socfpga]: intel-socfpga: upgrade kernel patches for stratix10 platform on 07/01/2022 Meng Li wrote: > From: Limeng > > Hi Bruce, > > I got some latest intel-socfpga BSP related patches from intel sdk kernel

Re: [linux-yocto]: [kernel for intel-socfpga]: psci: don't create online interface file for cpu0 on intel socfpga platform

In message: [linux-yocto]: [kernel for intel-socfpga]: psci: don't create online interface file for cpu0 on intel socfpga platform on 10/01/2022 Meng Li wrote: > From: Limeng > > Hi Bruce, > > This patch is a work around for cpu0 off/on feature on intel socfpga platform > > Could you please

Re: [linux-yocto]: [kernel for intel-socfpga]: arm64: dts: intel: improve qspi node for rsu feature

In message: [linux-yocto]: [kernel for intel-socfpga]: arm64: dts: intel: improve qspi node for rsu feature on 10/01/2022 Meng Li wrote: > From: Limeng > > Hi Bruce, > > This patch is used to improve qspi node for rsu feature > > Could you please help to merge this patch into linux-ycoto