Re: [yocto] [PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper] run-docs-build: allow build warnings again
Richard, Quentin, On 7/5/22 13:58, Richard Purdie wrote: On Tue, 2022-07-05 at 13:21 +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote: Hi Richard, Michael, On 7/4/22 16:23, Richard Purdie wrote: On Mon, 2022-07-04 at 15:24 +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote: Hi Michael, On 6/22/22 17:32, Michael Opdenacker via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: From: Michael Opdenacker This allows to switch to a more recent of Sphinx which will generate warnings with old versions of docs. This way, it's not immediately necessary to patch all such versions. This commit reverts https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__git.yoctoproject.org_yocto-2Dautobuilder-2Dhelper_commit_-3Fid-3D8273124feb9da2ffe93fcee7c4529d5597e1684a=DwIDAg=_sEr5x9kUWhuk4_nFwjJtA=LYjLexDn7rXIzVmkNPvw5ymA1XTSqHGq8yBP6m6qZZ4njZguQhZhkI_-172IIy1t=je4C362aUVxZ2rdozdrQVTgzhi9iRYrxNfYtH5LHkXdlsay9SEphJ_ekBm4830_n=9u5-2R_NLEQy5w0pFgklKIUQnAvVLuHX1ASaeEBBJJ4= which originally reverted https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__git.yoctoproject.org_yocto-2Dautobuilder-2Dhelper_commit_-3Fid-3D931d409b255a85f2217ca093d8391a678ce00ddb=DwIDAg=_sEr5x9kUWhuk4_nFwjJtA=LYjLexDn7rXIzVmkNPvw5ymA1XTSqHGq8yBP6m6qZZ4njZguQhZhkI_-172IIy1t=je4C362aUVxZ2rdozdrQVTgzhi9iRYrxNfYtH5LHkXdlsay9SEphJ_ekBm4830_n=bTED2gTptfT6bSvLayy3fEpQJyUdbo5gLlt7ZGKkD1c= Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker --- scripts/run-docs-build | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/run-docs-build b/scripts/run-docs-build index 648a29d..0f74520 100755 --- a/scripts/run-docs-build +++ b/scripts/run-docs-build @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ for branch in 1.46 $(git branch --remote --contains "$first_sphinx_commit" --for git checkout $branch git checkout master releases.rst make clean -make publish +SPHINXOPTS="-j auto" make publish if [ "$branch" = "master-next" ]; then branch="next" @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ for branch in dunfell $(git branch --remote --contains "$first_sphinx_commit" -- fi make clean -make publish +SPHINXOPTS="-j auto" make publish What about doing this for all branches except master? To have at least some checks and not completely disable the warnings. I'm a bit afraid we'll just not care about warnings anymore since they won't fail the autobuilder anymore. I also understand it's not really sustainable to leave them on for old docs since they won't be maintained at one point in time but we still very mnuch would like to be able to build them. Not sure what's the best solution here right now unfortunately :/ Enabling them for master could be a compromise, I'd take such a patch (Michael is away for a while). Some warnings are actually valid. Such is the case for the one that warranted https://git.yoctoproject.org/yocto-docs/commit/?id=9a797dedf6708da3e7ce789c5c8735e5d891cde4. The issue is that we build the docs from old versions with the same version of sphinx. Therefore, this patch fixes the issue in master but should also be backported to all other impacted versions, even the unmaintained ones. See https://docs.yoctoproject.org/dunfell/dev-manual/dev-manual-common-tasks.html#recipe-syntax, instead of a link we now have a path between quotes. There are two ways to fix that one warning: - add intersphinx_disabled_reftypes=[] in conf.py manually from the run-docs-build script, c.f. https://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/usage/extensions/intersphinx.html#confval-intersphinx_disabled_reftypes - patch all (tagged and branch) releases from 3.2 to current master in scripts/docs-build-patches, I prefer the second option because it feels less hacky, but that means MANY times the same file added to docs-build-patches directory. The same could be done for the patch I just sent for yocto-docs to use the %s substitution characters for the cve extlinks to fix a warning. We could just apply this patch to affected releases (kirkstone-4.0.1 tag + kirkstone branch). I could technically request a backport to yocto-docs kirkstone branch, the only thing I don't like is bumping the min version requirement for sphinx for a release that was already released, but if that's okay with you, we could avoid having to add patches in the autobuilder for every new tagged release of kirkstone. I'm honestly not sure there's a lot of benefit in disabling the warnings for now, or enabling them only for select releases. I understand that this increases the maintenance burden on unmaintained branches every time we update the sphinx binary in the docs buildtools. However, we missed this new broken link for almost a month now, which shows we don't look at successful docs build logs from the autobuilder. Perhaps it is time we split the master build from the stable releases and used different buildtools tarballs for them? That has it's own set of challenges of course too. I'd vote for such a solution, as it would allow to move on to newer versions of Sphinx without breaking existing
Re: [yocto] [PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper] run-docs-build: allow build warnings again
On Tue, 2022-07-05 at 13:21 +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote: > Hi Richard, Michael, > > On 7/4/22 16:23, Richard Purdie wrote: > > On Mon, 2022-07-04 at 15:24 +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote: > > > Hi Michael, > > > > > > On 6/22/22 17:32, Michael Opdenacker via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > > > > From: Michael Opdenacker > > > > > > > > This allows to switch to a more recent of Sphinx > > > > which will generate warnings with old versions of docs. > > > > > > > > This way, it's not immediately necessary to patch > > > > all such versions. > > > > > > > > This commit reverts > > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__git.yoctoproject.org_yocto-2Dautobuilder-2Dhelper_commit_-3Fid-3D8273124feb9da2ffe93fcee7c4529d5597e1684a=DwIDAg=_sEr5x9kUWhuk4_nFwjJtA=LYjLexDn7rXIzVmkNPvw5ymA1XTSqHGq8yBP6m6qZZ4njZguQhZhkI_-172IIy1t=je4C362aUVxZ2rdozdrQVTgzhi9iRYrxNfYtH5LHkXdlsay9SEphJ_ekBm4830_n=9u5-2R_NLEQy5w0pFgklKIUQnAvVLuHX1ASaeEBBJJ4= > > > > which originally reverted > > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__git.yoctoproject.org_yocto-2Dautobuilder-2Dhelper_commit_-3Fid-3D931d409b255a85f2217ca093d8391a678ce00ddb=DwIDAg=_sEr5x9kUWhuk4_nFwjJtA=LYjLexDn7rXIzVmkNPvw5ymA1XTSqHGq8yBP6m6qZZ4njZguQhZhkI_-172IIy1t=je4C362aUVxZ2rdozdrQVTgzhi9iRYrxNfYtH5LHkXdlsay9SEphJ_ekBm4830_n=bTED2gTptfT6bSvLayy3fEpQJyUdbo5gLlt7ZGKkD1c= > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker > > > > --- > > > >scripts/run-docs-build | 4 ++-- > > > >1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > diff --git a/scripts/run-docs-build b/scripts/run-docs-build > > > > index 648a29d..0f74520 100755 > > > > --- a/scripts/run-docs-build > > > > +++ b/scripts/run-docs-build > > > > @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ for branch in 1.46 $(git branch --remote --contains > > > > "$first_sphinx_commit" --for > > > >git checkout $branch > > > >git checkout master releases.rst > > > >make clean > > > > -make publish > > > > +SPHINXOPTS="-j auto" make publish > > > > > > > >if [ "$branch" = "master-next" ]; then > > > >branch="next" > > > > @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ for branch in dunfell $(git branch --remote > > > > --contains "$first_sphinx_commit" -- > > > >fi > > > > > > > >make clean > > > > -make publish > > > > +SPHINXOPTS="-j auto" make publish > > > > > > > > > > What about doing this for all branches except master? To have at least > > > some checks and not completely disable the warnings. > > > > > > I'm a bit afraid we'll just not care about warnings anymore since they > > > won't fail the autobuilder anymore. I also understand it's not really > > > sustainable to leave them on for old docs since they won't be maintained > > > at one point in time but we still very mnuch would like to be able to > > > build them. > > > > > > Not sure what's the best solution here right now unfortunately :/ > > > > Enabling them for master could be a compromise, I'd take such a patch > > (Michael is away for a while). > > > > Some warnings are actually valid. Such is the case for the one that > warranted > https://git.yoctoproject.org/yocto-docs/commit/?id=9a797dedf6708da3e7ce789c5c8735e5d891cde4. > > The issue is that we build the docs from old versions with the same > version of sphinx. Therefore, this patch fixes the issue in master but > should also be backported to all other impacted versions, even the > unmaintained ones. See > https://docs.yoctoproject.org/dunfell/dev-manual/dev-manual-common-tasks.html#recipe-syntax, > > instead of a link we now have a path between quotes. > > There are two ways to fix that one warning: > - add intersphinx_disabled_reftypes=[] in conf.py manually from the > run-docs-build script, c.f. > https://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/usage/extensions/intersphinx.html#confval-intersphinx_disabled_reftypes > - patch all (tagged and branch) releases from 3.2 to current master in > scripts/docs-build-patches, > > I prefer the second option because it feels less hacky, but that means > MANY times the same file added to docs-build-patches directory. > > The same could be done for the patch I just sent for yocto-docs to use > the %s substitution characters for the cve extlinks to fix a warning. We > could just apply this patch to affected releases (kirkstone-4.0.1 tag + > kirkstone branch). I could technically request a backport to yocto-docs > kirkstone branch, the only thing I don't like is bumping the min version > requirement for sphinx for a release that was already released, but if > that's okay with you, we could avoid having to add patches in the > autobuilder for every new tagged release of kirkstone. > > I'm honestly not sure there's a lot of benefit in disabling the warnings > for now, or enabling them only for select releases. I understand that > this increases the maintenance burden on unmaintained branches every > time we update the sphinx binary in the docs
Re: [yocto] [PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper] run-docs-build: allow build warnings again
Hi Richard, Michael, On 7/4/22 16:23, Richard Purdie wrote: On Mon, 2022-07-04 at 15:24 +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote: Hi Michael, On 6/22/22 17:32, Michael Opdenacker via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: From: Michael Opdenacker This allows to switch to a more recent of Sphinx which will generate warnings with old versions of docs. This way, it's not immediately necessary to patch all such versions. This commit reverts https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__git.yoctoproject.org_yocto-2Dautobuilder-2Dhelper_commit_-3Fid-3D8273124feb9da2ffe93fcee7c4529d5597e1684a=DwIDAg=_sEr5x9kUWhuk4_nFwjJtA=LYjLexDn7rXIzVmkNPvw5ymA1XTSqHGq8yBP6m6qZZ4njZguQhZhkI_-172IIy1t=je4C362aUVxZ2rdozdrQVTgzhi9iRYrxNfYtH5LHkXdlsay9SEphJ_ekBm4830_n=9u5-2R_NLEQy5w0pFgklKIUQnAvVLuHX1ASaeEBBJJ4= which originally reverted https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__git.yoctoproject.org_yocto-2Dautobuilder-2Dhelper_commit_-3Fid-3D931d409b255a85f2217ca093d8391a678ce00ddb=DwIDAg=_sEr5x9kUWhuk4_nFwjJtA=LYjLexDn7rXIzVmkNPvw5ymA1XTSqHGq8yBP6m6qZZ4njZguQhZhkI_-172IIy1t=je4C362aUVxZ2rdozdrQVTgzhi9iRYrxNfYtH5LHkXdlsay9SEphJ_ekBm4830_n=bTED2gTptfT6bSvLayy3fEpQJyUdbo5gLlt7ZGKkD1c= Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker --- scripts/run-docs-build | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/run-docs-build b/scripts/run-docs-build index 648a29d..0f74520 100755 --- a/scripts/run-docs-build +++ b/scripts/run-docs-build @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ for branch in 1.46 $(git branch --remote --contains "$first_sphinx_commit" --for git checkout $branch git checkout master releases.rst make clean -make publish +SPHINXOPTS="-j auto" make publish if [ "$branch" = "master-next" ]; then branch="next" @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ for branch in dunfell $(git branch --remote --contains "$first_sphinx_commit" -- fi make clean -make publish +SPHINXOPTS="-j auto" make publish What about doing this for all branches except master? To have at least some checks and not completely disable the warnings. I'm a bit afraid we'll just not care about warnings anymore since they won't fail the autobuilder anymore. I also understand it's not really sustainable to leave them on for old docs since they won't be maintained at one point in time but we still very mnuch would like to be able to build them. Not sure what's the best solution here right now unfortunately :/ Enabling them for master could be a compromise, I'd take such a patch (Michael is away for a while). Some warnings are actually valid. Such is the case for the one that warranted https://git.yoctoproject.org/yocto-docs/commit/?id=9a797dedf6708da3e7ce789c5c8735e5d891cde4. The issue is that we build the docs from old versions with the same version of sphinx. Therefore, this patch fixes the issue in master but should also be backported to all other impacted versions, even the unmaintained ones. See https://docs.yoctoproject.org/dunfell/dev-manual/dev-manual-common-tasks.html#recipe-syntax, instead of a link we now have a path between quotes. There are two ways to fix that one warning: - add intersphinx_disabled_reftypes=[] in conf.py manually from the run-docs-build script, c.f. https://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/usage/extensions/intersphinx.html#confval-intersphinx_disabled_reftypes - patch all (tagged and branch) releases from 3.2 to current master in scripts/docs-build-patches, I prefer the second option because it feels less hacky, but that means MANY times the same file added to docs-build-patches directory. The same could be done for the patch I just sent for yocto-docs to use the %s substitution characters for the cve extlinks to fix a warning. We could just apply this patch to affected releases (kirkstone-4.0.1 tag + kirkstone branch). I could technically request a backport to yocto-docs kirkstone branch, the only thing I don't like is bumping the min version requirement for sphinx for a release that was already released, but if that's okay with you, we could avoid having to add patches in the autobuilder for every new tagged release of kirkstone. I'm honestly not sure there's a lot of benefit in disabling the warnings for now, or enabling them only for select releases. I understand that this increases the maintenance burden on unmaintained branches every time we update the sphinx binary in the docs buildtools. However, we missed this new broken link for almost a month now, which shows we don't look at successful docs build logs from the autobuilder. Cheers, Quentin -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#57450): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/57450 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/91924295/21656 Group Owner: yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [yocto] [PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper] run-docs-build: allow build warnings again
On Mon, 2022-07-04 at 15:24 +0200, Quentin Schulz wrote: > Hi Michael, > > On 6/22/22 17:32, Michael Opdenacker via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: > > From: Michael Opdenacker > > > > This allows to switch to a more recent of Sphinx > > which will generate warnings with old versions of docs. > > > > This way, it's not immediately necessary to patch > > all such versions. > > > > This commit reverts > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__git.yoctoproject.org_yocto-2Dautobuilder-2Dhelper_commit_-3Fid-3D8273124feb9da2ffe93fcee7c4529d5597e1684a=DwIDAg=_sEr5x9kUWhuk4_nFwjJtA=LYjLexDn7rXIzVmkNPvw5ymA1XTSqHGq8yBP6m6qZZ4njZguQhZhkI_-172IIy1t=je4C362aUVxZ2rdozdrQVTgzhi9iRYrxNfYtH5LHkXdlsay9SEphJ_ekBm4830_n=9u5-2R_NLEQy5w0pFgklKIUQnAvVLuHX1ASaeEBBJJ4= > > which originally reverted > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__git.yoctoproject.org_yocto-2Dautobuilder-2Dhelper_commit_-3Fid-3D931d409b255a85f2217ca093d8391a678ce00ddb=DwIDAg=_sEr5x9kUWhuk4_nFwjJtA=LYjLexDn7rXIzVmkNPvw5ymA1XTSqHGq8yBP6m6qZZ4njZguQhZhkI_-172IIy1t=je4C362aUVxZ2rdozdrQVTgzhi9iRYrxNfYtH5LHkXdlsay9SEphJ_ekBm4830_n=bTED2gTptfT6bSvLayy3fEpQJyUdbo5gLlt7ZGKkD1c= > > > > Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker > > --- > > scripts/run-docs-build | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/scripts/run-docs-build b/scripts/run-docs-build > > index 648a29d..0f74520 100755 > > --- a/scripts/run-docs-build > > +++ b/scripts/run-docs-build > > @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ for branch in 1.46 $(git branch --remote --contains > > "$first_sphinx_commit" --for > > git checkout $branch > > git checkout master releases.rst > > make clean > > -make publish > > +SPHINXOPTS="-j auto" make publish > > > > if [ "$branch" = "master-next" ]; then > > branch="next" > > @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ for branch in dunfell $(git branch --remote --contains > > "$first_sphinx_commit" -- > > fi > > > > make clean > > -make publish > > +SPHINXOPTS="-j auto" make publish > > > > What about doing this for all branches except master? To have at least > some checks and not completely disable the warnings. > > I'm a bit afraid we'll just not care about warnings anymore since they > won't fail the autobuilder anymore. I also understand it's not really > sustainable to leave them on for old docs since they won't be maintained > at one point in time but we still very mnuch would like to be able to > build them. > > Not sure what's the best solution here right now unfortunately :/ Enabling them for master could be a compromise, I'd take such a patch (Michael is away for a while). Cheers, Richard -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#57438): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/57438 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/91924295/21656 Group Owner: yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: [yocto] [PATCH yocto-autobuilder-helper] run-docs-build: allow build warnings again
Hi Michael, On 6/22/22 17:32, Michael Opdenacker via lists.yoctoproject.org wrote: From: Michael Opdenacker This allows to switch to a more recent of Sphinx which will generate warnings with old versions of docs. This way, it's not immediately necessary to patch all such versions. This commit reverts https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__git.yoctoproject.org_yocto-2Dautobuilder-2Dhelper_commit_-3Fid-3D8273124feb9da2ffe93fcee7c4529d5597e1684a=DwIDAg=_sEr5x9kUWhuk4_nFwjJtA=LYjLexDn7rXIzVmkNPvw5ymA1XTSqHGq8yBP6m6qZZ4njZguQhZhkI_-172IIy1t=je4C362aUVxZ2rdozdrQVTgzhi9iRYrxNfYtH5LHkXdlsay9SEphJ_ekBm4830_n=9u5-2R_NLEQy5w0pFgklKIUQnAvVLuHX1ASaeEBBJJ4= which originally reverted https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__git.yoctoproject.org_yocto-2Dautobuilder-2Dhelper_commit_-3Fid-3D931d409b255a85f2217ca093d8391a678ce00ddb=DwIDAg=_sEr5x9kUWhuk4_nFwjJtA=LYjLexDn7rXIzVmkNPvw5ymA1XTSqHGq8yBP6m6qZZ4njZguQhZhkI_-172IIy1t=je4C362aUVxZ2rdozdrQVTgzhi9iRYrxNfYtH5LHkXdlsay9SEphJ_ekBm4830_n=bTED2gTptfT6bSvLayy3fEpQJyUdbo5gLlt7ZGKkD1c= Signed-off-by: Michael Opdenacker --- scripts/run-docs-build | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/scripts/run-docs-build b/scripts/run-docs-build index 648a29d..0f74520 100755 --- a/scripts/run-docs-build +++ b/scripts/run-docs-build @@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ for branch in 1.46 $(git branch --remote --contains "$first_sphinx_commit" --for git checkout $branch git checkout master releases.rst make clean -make publish +SPHINXOPTS="-j auto" make publish if [ "$branch" = "master-next" ]; then branch="next" @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@ for branch in dunfell $(git branch --remote --contains "$first_sphinx_commit" -- fi make clean -make publish +SPHINXOPTS="-j auto" make publish What about doing this for all branches except master? To have at least some checks and not completely disable the warnings. I'm a bit afraid we'll just not care about warnings anymore since they won't fail the autobuilder anymore. I also understand it's not really sustainable to leave them on for old docs since they won't be maintained at one point in time but we still very mnuch would like to be able to build them. Not sure what's the best solution here right now unfortunately :/ Cheers, Quentin -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#57437): https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/message/57437 Mute This Topic: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/mt/91924295/21656 Group Owner: yocto+ow...@lists.yoctoproject.org Unsubscribe: https://lists.yoctoproject.org/g/yocto/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
