On 6/13/22 2:32 PM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Mon, 2022-06-13 at 13:08 -0700, Rudolf J Streif wrote:
I don't exactly know how the glibc versioning works. I suppose the
API versions are defined by the Version file of the various
components.
However, when I did more analysis on the libraries
On Mon, 2022-06-13 at 13:08 -0700, Rudolf J Streif wrote:
> I don't exactly know how the glibc versioning works. I suppose the
> API versions are defined by the Version file of the various
> components.
>
> However, when I did more analysis on the libraries whose libc
> versions did not seem to be
Thanks, Richard. I was sidetracked by other stuff, hence the delay.
Please see below.
On 6/8/22 8:54 AM, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Tue, 2022-06-07 at 18:17 -0700, Rudolf J Streif wrote:
On 6/7/22 4:36 PM, Chuck Wolber wrote:
>> Is there an elegant way around it?
>>
>>
On Tue, 2022-06-07 at 18:17 -0700, Rudolf J Streif wrote:
>
> On 6/7/22 4:36 PM, Chuck Wolber wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > > >> Is there an elegant way around it?
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Error:
> > > > > >> Problem: conflicting requests
> > > > >
I think what should help you is
EXCLUDE_FROM_SHLIBS = "1"
which disables poking into libraries to auto-generate those
dependencies that otherwise cause both qa and dnf errors.
Alex
On Wed, 8 Jun 2022 at 00:48, Rudolf J Streif wrote:
>
>
> On 6/7/22 3:12 PM, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
>
> Can you
On 6/7/22 4:36 PM, Chuck Wolber wrote:
>> Is there an elegant way around it?
>>
>>
>> Error:
>> Problem: conflicting requests
>> - nothing provides libdl.so.2 needed by
>> xxx-single-group-0.1-r0.cortexa53_crypto
>> -
> >> Is there an elegant way around it?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Error:
>> >>Problem: conflicting requests
>> >> - nothing provides libdl.so.2 needed by
>> >> xxx-single-group-0.1-r0.cortexa53_crypto
>> >> - nothing provides libdl.so.2(GLIBC_2.0) needed by
>>
>
Could this be considered a bug
On 6/7/22 3:12 PM, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
Can you drop insane_skip for a moment and show what errors then happen?
Yes, thank you.
ERROR: xxx-single-group-0.1-r0 do_package_qa: QA Issue:
/opt/binstuf/linux-allwinneryocto-armle-opengles_2.0-obj/lib/libfbxsdk.so
contained in package
Can you drop insane_skip for a moment and show what errors then happen?
Alex
On Tue 7. Jun 2022 at 22.57, Rudolf J Streif
wrote:
>
> On 6/7/22 12:44 PM, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
> > Can you show the recipe that you wrote for the blob?
>
> Not exactly as is because of customer names, but below
On 6/7/22 12:44 PM, Alexander Kanavin wrote:
Can you show the recipe that you wrote for the blob?
Not exactly as is because of customer names, but below is a sanitized
version:
SUMMARY = "Binary Stuff"
LICENSE = "CLOSED"
SRC_URI = "file://binary_installer.tgz \
"
do_install()
Can you show the recipe that you wrote for the blob?
Alex
On Tue, 7 Jun 2022 at 20:59, Rudolf J Streif wrote:
>
> I have been handed a binary package that I am integrating into a Yocto
> build.
>
> When dnf runs it complains about missing dependencies. These are
> standard libraries of course
11 matches
Mail list logo
