[yocto] sgml-common failure

2012-06-18 Thread Jack Mitchell
Trying to build poky on master and I recieve the following error with sgml-common-native: ERROR: Function failed: sgml_common_sstate_postinst (see /home/jack/Projects/poky-denzil.git/r0005/tmp/work/x86_64-linux/sgml-common-native-0.6.3-r0/temp/log.do_populate_sysroot.4701 for further

Re: [yocto] Discussion: Package testing

2012-06-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 15:26 +0200, Björn Stenberg wrote: Many source packages include their own package test suites. We are looking at running these tests on target in a structured way, and I would like a discussion about how to best fit this into the Yocto framework. The actions that need

[yocto] question about devtools-native tasks

2012-06-18 Thread Bongseo Jang
Hi All, I'm watching console output of 'bitbake minimal-core-image' It starts with getting native devtools like, NOTE: Running task 1 of 63 (ID: 11, /home/bsjang/poky/meta/recipes-devtools/quilt/quilt-native_0.60.bb, do_fetch) NOTE: Running task 2 of 63 (ID: 53,

Re: [yocto] RFC: poky-tiny: init procedure

2012-06-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 14:10 -0700, Tim Bird wrote: One of our early efforts, getting busybox to not fork commands in init scripts that it had as builtins, proved to be a significant feature that is still valuable today to improve boot time. I'd add that one thing we did with Poky's init

Re: [yocto] question about devtools-native tasks

2012-06-18 Thread Richard Purdie
On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 20:48 +0900, Bongseo Jang wrote: Hi All, I'm watching console output of 'bitbake minimal-core-image' It starts with getting native devtools like, NOTE: Running task 1 of 63 (ID: 11, /home/bsjang/poky/meta/recipes-devtools/quilt/quilt-native_0.60.bb, do_fetch)

Re: [yocto] Discussion: Package testing

2012-06-18 Thread Fredrik Hugosson
On 06/18/2012 01:43 PM, Richard Purdie wrote: On Thu, 2012-06-14 at 15:26 +0200, Björn Stenberg wrote: Many source packages include their own package test suites. We are looking at running these tests on target in a structured way, and I would like a discussion about how to best fit this into

Re: [yocto] Discussion: Package testing

2012-06-18 Thread Björn Stenberg
Fredrik Hugosson wrote: I think you both might be missing some cases here. The problem is that 'make check' does not have a standardized meaning. Even if there was a standardized meaning to make check, there are lots of packages that use completely differents systems for their building and

Re: [yocto] Discussion: Package testing

2012-06-18 Thread Björn Stenberg
Richard Purdie wrote: c) (-ptest) Install all test files to /opt/ptest/${PN}-${PV} (for example). Make a package ptest-runner that has a script /opt/ptest/run-all-tests to iterate over all installed tests and run them. This is our suggestion. Can we suitably extract the tests out of the

[yocto] [PATCH][meta-intel] linux-firmware: Fix FILESEXTRAPATHS typo

2012-06-18 Thread Darren Hart
Add a missing } in the FILESEXTRAPATHS assignment. Signed-off-by: Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com --- common/recipes-kernel/linux-firmware/linux-firmware_git.bbappend |2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

[yocto] Dependency Tree

2012-06-18 Thread Jim Rucker
I'm trying to build using the code sourcery external compiler and I noticed that it's pulling in qemu. This brings up 2 questions- 1. Why? Qemu is not a prerequisite for building with GCC and shouldn't be a prerequisite for building with CS. 2. How can I easily generate a dependency tree so I can

[yocto] is there a summary of the proper use of all yocto-related mailing lists?

2012-06-18 Thread Robert P. J. Day
given the number of mailing lists related to yocto and its components, is there somewhere a decent summary of what topics are relevant for what lists? at last count, i see at least the following lists that relate in one form or another to the final yocto project: * oe-core * oe-devel *

Re: [yocto] Dependency Tree

2012-06-18 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Jim Rucker linux.mrjim...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying to build using the code sourcery external compiler and I noticed that it's pulling in qemu. This brings up 2 questions- 1. Why? Qemu is not a prerequisite for building with GCC and shouldn't be a

[yocto] [PATCH 0/2] [meta-yocto] poky-tiny: busybox bbappend and tiny-init

2012-06-18 Thread Darren Hart
Fix job control in the root shell on poky-tiny images by adding SETSID and CTTYHACK support to busybox and providing a simple tiny-init startup script. The following changes since commit e0a70547069fe7e8a2d6bdaffc985fb172d46c31: perl: Allow perl to cross build and native build in a directory

[yocto] [PATCH 1/2] busybox: Introduce poky-tiny defconfig override

2012-06-18 Thread Darren Hart
When building very small systems, it can be useful to spawn a shell from a simple init script, rather than a full System V Init process. This requires the shell be the session leader and be able to open the controlling terminal if it is to have job control. Create a busybox bbappend in meta-yocto

[yocto] [PATCH 2/2] tiny-init: Basic init mechanism for poky-tiny

2012-06-18 Thread Darren Hart
Currently poky-tiny images will boot and run /bin/sh, which results in error messages to the console about being unable to open the tty and job control being disabled. The shell must be session leader to open the tty, and the tty must not be /dev/console (it should be a vt or a physical tty like

[yocto] how detailed should yocto dev manual cover BSP?

2012-06-18 Thread Robert P. J. Day
diving back into the docs, i see that the current development manual claims, The Yocto Project Development Manual, however, does provide detailed examples on how to create a Board Support Package (BSP)... but why? there *is* a separate BSP guide. should the reader not be referred to the

[yocto] [PATCH 0/2] yocto-bsp: template fixes

2012-06-18 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com This updates some Yocto BSP templates to fix some recent metadata changes that caused the problems seen in YOCTO #2559. Please pull into poky/master. The following changes since commit 4ff6160d909e2a39e357c8a51f37d803dab64d5d: Richard Purdie (1):

[yocto] [PATCH 1/2] yocto-bsp: update yocto-bsp machine.conf template

2012-06-18 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com Some changes in the ordering assumptions of the qemu include rendered X inoperative, fix those in the qemu machine template. Fixes [YOCTO #2559] Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com --- .../arch/qemu/conf/machine/{{=machine}}.conf |

[yocto] [PATCH 2/2] yocto-bsp: update yocto-bsp xorg.conf templates

2012-06-18 Thread tom . zanussi
From: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com The non-x86 qemu machines now require an xorg.conf, change the templates accordingly. Fixes [YOCTO #2559] Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com --- .../xserver-xf86-config/{{=machine}}/xorg.conf |8 ...x86_64\: }}

Re: [yocto] how detailed should yocto dev manual cover BSP?

2012-06-18 Thread Rifenbark, Scott M
Hey Robert, The BSP Guide currently is focused on the BSP layout, layers, tools, and licensing. The Development Manual covers more overall development scenarios, of which the BSP is one of them. That is the rationale at the moment. Scott -Original Message- From:

Re: [yocto] how detailed should yocto dev manual cover BSP?

2012-06-18 Thread Robert P. J. Day
On Mon, 18 Jun 2012, Rifenbark, Scott M wrote: Hey Robert, The BSP Guide currently is focused on the BSP layout, layers, tools, and licensing. The Development Manual covers more overall development scenarios, of which the BSP is one of them. That is the rationale at the moment. ok, i'm

[yocto] basic recipe building - iperf

2012-06-18 Thread jfabernathy
I needed to do some network performance testing on a Crownbay board and needed iperf in that environment. Since I had the core-image-sato-sdk image created, I just booted that and took the tarball from Sourceforge and built it per the readme file instructions: ./configure make make install

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 2/2] tiny-init: Basic init mechanism for poky-tiny

2012-06-18 Thread Khem Raj
diff --git a/meta-yocto/recipes-core/tiny-init/files/init b/meta-yocto/recipes-core/tiny-init/files/init new file mode 100644 index 000..bf2817d --- /dev/null +++ b/meta-yocto/recipes-core/tiny-init/files/init @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +#!/bin/sh + +# Mount the Linux kernel virtual

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 2/2] tiny-init: Basic init mechanism for poky-tiny

2012-06-18 Thread Darren Hart
On 06/18/2012 02:06 PM, Khem Raj wrote: diff --git a/meta-yocto/recipes-core/tiny-init/files/init b/meta-yocto/recipes-core/tiny-init/files/init new file mode 100644 index 000..bf2817d --- /dev/null +++ b/meta-yocto/recipes-core/tiny-init/files/init @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +#!/bin/sh +

[yocto] RaspberryPi Kernel - Fails to boot when sound driver is a built-in

2012-06-18 Thread Chris Tapp
If I build the RPi kernel (SRCREV 3fc65f9f291fb19cad434968a4a0f66ab749e637) then the board boots as expected. However, if a modify the .config (either manually after -c configure, or by -c menuconfig) so that CONFIG_SND, CONFIG_SND_TIMER, CONFIG_SND_PCM and CONFIG_BCM2835 are set to 'y' (i.e.

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 2/2] tiny-init: Basic init mechanism for poky-tiny

2012-06-18 Thread Martin Jansa
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 02:11:58PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: On 06/18/2012 02:06 PM, Khem Raj wrote: diff --git a/meta-yocto/recipes-core/tiny-init/files/init b/meta-yocto/recipes-core/tiny-init/files/init new file mode 100644 index 000..bf2817d --- /dev/null +++

Re: [yocto] basic recipe building - iperf

2012-06-18 Thread Marc Ferland
jfabernathy jfaberna...@gmail.com writes: I needed to do some network performance testing on a Crownbay board and needed iperf in that environment. Since I had the core-image-sato-sdk image created, I just booted that and took the tarball from Sourceforge and built it per the

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 2/2] tiny-init: Basic init mechanism for poky-tiny

2012-06-18 Thread Darren Hart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/18/2012 02:18 PM, Martin Jansa wrote: On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 02:11:58PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote: On 06/18/2012 02:06 PM, Khem Raj wrote: diff --git a/meta-yocto/recipes-core/tiny-init/files/init

Re: [yocto] [PATCH 2/2] tiny-init: Basic init mechanism for poky-tiny

2012-06-18 Thread Khem Raj
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote: what if someone is using tiny-init in image with coreutils/util-linux/whatever is needed to execute /init without busybox? it wont work. Thats why I asked for rdepend ___

[yocto] grub-efi-native_1.99.bb fails in master branch

2012-06-18 Thread Bodke, Kishore K
Hi, I see a build fail for grub-efi-native_1.99 recipe in master branch for Cedartrail BSP. NOTE: package grub-efi-i586-native-1.99-r9: task do_compile: Started ERROR: Function failed: do_compile (see

Re: [yocto] grub-efi-native_1.99.bb fails in master branch

2012-06-18 Thread Darren Hart
On 06/18/2012 03:10 PM, Bodke, Kishore K wrote: Hi, I see a build fail for grub-efi-native_1.99 recipe in master branch for Cedartrail BSP. Appears to be the same as: https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2527 Thanks, Darren NOTE: package grub-efi-i586-native-1.99-r9:

Re: [yocto] is there a summary of the proper use of all yocto-related mailing lists?

2012-06-18 Thread Tyler Jones
On 18 June 2012 13:06, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote: given the number of mailing lists related to yocto and its components, is there somewhere a decent summary of what topics are relevant for what lists? at last count, i see at least the following lists that relate in one

Re: [yocto] basic recipe building - iperf

2012-06-18 Thread James Abernathy
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:29 PM, jfabernathy jfaberna...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/18/2012 05:21 PM, Marc Ferland wrote: jfabernathyjfabernathy@gmail.**com jfaberna...@gmail.com writes: I needed to do some network performance testing on a Crownbay board and needed iperf in that

Re: [yocto] basic recipe building - iperf

2012-06-18 Thread Khem Raj
On Monday, June 18, 2012, James Abernathy jfaberna...@gmail.com wrote: On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 5:29 PM, jfabernathy jfaberna...@gmail.com wrote: On 06/18/2012 05:21 PM, Marc Ferland wrote: jfabernathyjfaberna...@gmail.com writes: I needed to do some network performance testing on a