Re: [yocto] Wireshark but no Tshark?

Okay thank you very much for the clarification. Is there a set password for the root username? I'm attempting to send files across and run scripts abord the joule from my host system! On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 3:50 AM, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > On 7 June 2017 at 20:59,

Re: [yocto] LLVM linking for custom recipe

Hi, I'm still stuck here, assistance would be appreciated. Giordon On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 7:51 PM Giordon Stark wrote: > Looking into more details, I don't know or where bitbake tries to look for > things as things get compiled (flags, environment, etc)... but the error >

[yocto] mkfifo: not found

Hello, I upgraded from poky 2.1 to 2.3 and now I have an issue with mkfifo in a do_install step. The error is "mkfifo: not found" I already added the package coreutils as dependency. Does someone has some hints for me? Regards Michael -- ___ yocto

Re: [yocto] mkfifo: not found

On Mon, 2017-06-12 at 15:01 +, Baumann, Michael wrote: > Hello, > > I upgraded from poky 2.1 to 2.3 and now I have an issue with mkfifo in a > do_install step. > The error is "mkfifo: not found" > I already added the package coreutils as dependency. > a bit more info of what you are doing

[yocto] Yocto Project Status WW24’17

Current Dev Position: Preparing for YP 2.4 M1 Next Deadline: YP 2.4 M1 Cut off is June 12, 2017 SWAT team rotation: Todor -> Alejandro on June 9, 2017. SWAT team rotation: Alejandro -> Jussi on June 16, 2017. https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/Yocto_Build_Failure_Swat_Team Key

Re: [yocto] mkfifo: not found

On 12 June 2017 at 16:01, Baumann, Michael wrote: > I upgraded from poky 2.1 to 2.3 and now I have an issue with mkfifo in a > do_install step. > The error is "mkfifo: not found" > I already added the package coreutils as dependency. > Ah, mkfifo is missing from

Re: [yocto] Wireshark but no Tshark?

I was able to create a username and password, and use this as credentials for SSH. However, I can't run some of the commands that I can when using picocom, and thus operating as root. On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Michael Calve wrote: > Okay thank you very much

Re: [yocto] [PATCH][meta-gplv2] gnutls: add use-pkg-config-to-locate-zlib.patch

On 12 June 2017 at 20:04, Andre McCurdy wrote: > Would it be better to just make the meta-gplv2 gnutls recipe self > contained and stop trying to share a .inc file and patches with > oe-core? > Yes. Ross -- ___ yocto mailing

Re: [yocto] Wireshark but no Tshark?

On 2017-06-12 19:19, Michael Calve wrote: I was able to create a username and password, and use this as credentials for SSH. However, I can't run some of the commands that I can when using picocom, and thus operating as root. Such as? On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 10:34 AM, Michael Calve

[yocto] [qa-tools][PATCH] testopia_update: Add functionality to list templates

From: Jose Perez Carranza Add support to list available templates per specific releases Signed-off-by: Jose Perez Carranza --- testopia_update.py | 18 --

[yocto] [PATCH][meta-gplv2] gnutls: add use-pkg-config-to-locate-zlib.patch

* it was modified in oe-core/master in this commit: commit ba7e5f51327d9833776aa066f30c5e46606be374 Author: Fan Xin Date: Fri Jun 9 15:49:18 2017 +0900 gnutls: Upgrade to 3.5.13 1. Upgrade gnutls from 3.5.9 to 3.5.13 2. Rebase the following patch file.

Re: [yocto] [PATCH][meta-gplv2] gnutls: add use-pkg-config-to-locate-zlib.patch

On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 9:22 AM, Martin Jansa wrote: > * it was modified in oe-core/master in this commit: > commit ba7e5f51327d9833776aa066f30c5e46606be374 > Author: Fan Xin > Date: Fri Jun 9 15:49:18 2017 +0900 > > gnutls: Upgrade to 3.5.13

[yocto] samba create user with password

Hi, i'm trying to configure a samba server from yocto for my card. I have a working server (add samba in local.conf), but i would like to add the user with password to samba at yocto build step. For this i add this recipe (samba_%.bbappend) FILESEXTRAPATHS_prepend := "${THISDIR}/files:" #

[yocto] [PATCH V4 00/10] Several fixes for layerindex

* V4 - Add an option -i to update_layer.py to get initial layer value (dependencies, versions and so on), update.py doesn't use tinfoil any more since tinfoil before morty can't be shutdown totally if the process is not exited, this was why splitted update_layer.py from update.py.

[yocto] [PATCH V4 04/10] update_layer.py: set layerbranch's collection before add_dependencies

The _add_dependency() uses: if layerbranch.collection: var_name = layerbranch.collection The layerbranch.collection is none if it is newly created, thus it can't get LAYERDEPENDS, because what defined in layer.conf is LAYERDEPENDS_, but what it would get is LAYERDEPENDS_, this patch can fix

[yocto] [PATCH V4 06/10] update.py: update layers orderly

* Problems The update.py couldn't handle new (not only new branch, in fact, but also existing branches, see below for more info) branch well, for example, there are 3 layers: layer_A, layer_B and layer_C, and create new branch "branch_1" for them, and they have depends: layer_A -> layer_B ->

[yocto] [PATCH V4 07/10] update_layer.py: remove --update-dependencies

It never works since it is in the middle of transaction.atomic() block, and update.py doesn't need it any more, so remove it. Signed-off-by: Robert Yang --- layerindex/update_layer.py | 27 --- 1 file changed, 27 deletions(-) diff --git

[yocto] [PATCH V4 03/10] utils.py: remove obsolete dependencies

Fixed: - set LAYERDEPENDS_openembedded-layer = "core" - $ "update.py -l meta-oe -b master" Check from web, its dependency is "openembedded-core" - Change LAYERDEPENDS_openembedded-layer = "foo" - Run "update.py -l meta-oe -b master" Check from web, its dependency is

[yocto] [PATCH V4 08/10] update_layer.py: move the location of transaction.atomic()

It doesn't need to be so ahead since we only need it when writing database, and a following patch will remove layerbranch from database when the branch had been removed from the repo, it's not easy to do the work in transaction.atomic() block. Signed-off-by: Robert Yang

[yocto] [PATCH V4 09/10] update.py: add -p to git fetch

-p, --prune Before fetching, remove any remote-tracking references that no longer exist on the remote. Fixed: $ git push origin :test_branch $ ./update.py The test_branch was still in fetched local repo which was incorrect, it should be gone since it has been removed by upstream.

[yocto] [PATCH V4 10/10] update_layer.py: delete layerbranch for non-existed branch

The branch is not needed any more when it has been removed from the repo, so we also need remove its layerbranch, otherwise it still can be got from the web, which causes confusions. Note, we have to move the location of tinfiol's code to make it can be shutdown correctly. Signed-off-by: Robert

[yocto] [PATCH V4 01/10] update.py: update actual branch for layer and bitbake

Add an option "-a" to update actual branch for layer and bitbake, it is useful when there are many layers and need update actual branches frequantly. We only can update them via website without this patch, which is not funny and easy to make mistakes. * It works with "-l", and "-l bitbake" means

[yocto] [PATCH V4 05/10] recipeparse.py: restore cwd when the parsing is done

Othewise it may cause troubles to the function who calls it. Signed-off-by: Robert Yang --- layerindex/recipeparse.py | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/layerindex/recipeparse.py b/layerindex/recipeparse.py index dd85bc3..f2a5235 100644 ---

[yocto] [PATCH V4 02/10] layerconfparse.py: remove unused layerbranch from parse_layer()

The layerbranch is not used in parse_layer(), so remove it. Signed-off-by: Robert Yang --- layerindex/layerconfparse.py | 2 +- layerindex/tools/import_layer.py | 2 +- layerindex/update_layer.py | 4 ++-- 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Re: [yocto] [meta-rockchip][PATCH] u-boot-rockchip: Switch to u-boot-common_2017.05.inc

Hello, Le 11/06/2017 à 21:54, Trevor Woerner a écrit : > Hi Romain, > > My nightly builds alerted me to the problem, so I fixed it and already > pushed a patch. > Thanks! > > Best regards, > Trevor Erf, I missed that. Thanks, Romain -- ___ yocto

[yocto] meta-qt5 qtwebkit linking error

Hi, I'm triying to bitbake meta-toolchain-qt5 with yocto pyro and meta-qt5 master branch but I obtain an linking error with qtwebkit package. Does anyone faced the same problem? I have attached bitbake error log (I obtain the same error alse enabling DISTRO_FEATURES ld-as-gold) thank you regards

Re: [yocto] Wireshark but no Tshark?

On 7 June 2017 at 20:59, Michael Calve wrote: > Hi, I've seen that Wireshark is portable to Yocto, however Tshark is not? > Is there other/better software for reading pcaps and getting field data??? > Hi, tshark is part of wireshark: it should be built by the

Re: [yocto] Python 3 internal package dependencies

* Alexander Kanavin [170608 13:04]: > On 06/08/2017 11:50 AM, Burton, Ross wrote: > > Is it worth trying to improve the internal package RDEPENDS in the > > Python 3 recipe, or is it better for recipes for Python apps to just > > manually list all

[yocto] How to package the signed kernel modules into the filesystem ?

Hi, I am working with kernel 3.10.17 and poky daisy. The kernel was patched to support certificates list & trusted keyring. I managed to build the kernel both with an own keypair (signature done manually post-build) and with the CONFIG_MODULE_SIG_ALL option enabled. In the second case, I

[yocto] [meta-chip][PATCH] chip: Make sure to append to MACHINE_EXTRA_RRECOMMENDS rather than overwriting

From: Drew Moseley Signed-off-by: Drew Moseley --- conf/machine/chip.conf | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/conf/machine/chip.conf b/conf/machine/chip.conf index 7624de6..0a45a2f 100644 ---