Signed-off-by: Aaron Chan
---
config.py | 9 +
schedulers.py | 9 +++--
2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/config.py b/config.py
index 2568768..d21948f 100644
--- a/config.py
+++ b/config.py
@@ -80,3 +80,12 @@ builder_to_workers = {
Hi!
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 8:53 PM Mathieu Alexandre-Tétreault
wrote:
>
> Howdy,
>
> I am working on a project that requires the final image to contain a license
> manifest for all the packaged installed on the image.
Take a look at [1]. There's background on licence tacking and a
technique
Ee Peng,
On 06/12/2018 08:22 PM, Yeoh, Ee Peng wrote:
> Hello All,
>
> This is the full report for 2.4.3 RC2:
> https://wiki.yoctoproject.org/wiki/WW24_-_2018-06-12-_Full_Test_Cycle_-_2.4.3_rc2
>
> === Summary
>
> The QA cycle for release 2.4.3 RC2 was completed. Team had found
Very useful information!
This is the first time I understand this bbclass and BBCLASSEXTEND
mechanism (I was unable to understand it after reading documentation again
and again).
I managed implementing a custom but working solution.
Thanks a lot for sharing Mr Ulf! :)
2018-06-01 13:44 GMT+02:00
On 12/06/2018 05:43, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 8:36 PM Craig McQueen
mailto:craig.mcqu...@innerrange.com>>
wrote:
I wrote:
>
> I wrote:
> >
> > Lately, I'm trying to upgrade to a later version of mono, 5.4.1.6.
> > When I try to do a build of my
* Ulf Samuelsson [180612 22:01]:
> We want most of /etc to be read-only for security reasons,
> and the overlayfs will make the whole of /etc writeable.
> I tried mount —bind /etc/timezone /persistent/etc/timezone, and it
> complained that they were not directories. Bind mounting /etc again
>
Ok, I guess my question there then would be is how you'd determine
where a recipe "lived". Like, if meta-foo has a bbappends for
something in core, would you include it or not in your manifest?
If so, then taking the original manifest and just doing some text
manipulation in a
On 12/06/2018 15:10, Ioan-Adrian Ratiu wrote:
Newer versions of bitbake require each layer to explicitely state
their OE/Yocto release compatibility. The consensus is for each layer
to use the latest released version codename for the master branch.
Applied, thanks Ioan
--
A release candidate build for yocto-2.6_M1.rc1 is now available at:
https://autobuilder.yocto.io/pub/releases/yocto-2.6_M1.rc1
Please begin QA on this build as soon as possible.
Build hash information:
meta-intel : fec5d45ec3978d4b7c9649bee45fe58f914bcee4
meta-qt4 :
Beth,
This is for internal consumption. We want to be able to generate a full
manifest, and also one that reflects how we diverged from base Yocto
distribution.
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 10:55 AM Beth Flanagan wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 2:46 PM, Michael Habibi
> wrote:
> > Our use case is
Thanks, is it more efficient than symlinking?
Best Regards,
Ulf Samuelsson
> 13 juni 2018 kl. 15:20 skrev Anders Darander :
>
> * Ulf Samuelsson [180612 22:01]:
>
>> We want most of /etc to be read-only for security reasons,
>> and the overlayfs will make the whole of /etc writeable.
>
>> I
Hello,
I am working to activate the kernel module signature for in-tree and
out-of-tree packages.
While I was debugging the cause of the kernel complaining about unsigned
modules.
I noticed that yocto was stripping the signature information from the binary,
therefore I've
set
I would like to include the kernel Image and DTB files in the /boot/
directory of the root filesystem that will be installed in flash memory (
*vs.* a separate partition with the /boot/ content).
I am working with the meta-freescale layer, with MACHINE=ls1012afrdm and
core-image-minimal.
The
My changes for U-Boot are not working as expected. I am wondering- did I
use devtool incorrectly?
I used 'devtool modify' to create a working copy of the vendor's u-boot and
copied & modified files to add support for my custom board. I did my work
in 3 distinct and commitable steps, resulting in
So to clarify your question, basically everything we would want in the
custom manifest would be in our own layer: both bbappends and new bb
recipes. Given that, you think I could still modify it like you suggest to
get what I want?
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 8:59 AM Beth Flanagan wrote:
> Ok, I
On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 9:28 AM, Ulf Samuelsson wrote:
> Thanks, is it more efficient than symlinking?
Efficient in what way?
Have you looked at the volatile-binds recipe in oe-core? Its job is to
setup enough bind mounts to enable systemd to run from a readonly
rootfs. Although it's currently
16 matches
Mail list logo
