On 2013-03-07 8:11, Jerrod Peach wrote:
Hans,
Are you sure you're seeing the patch system use $WORKDIR instead of $S
as the root for patching? I've had to do a lot of patching in our own
layers recently and I've always seen $S used as the root for the
patch. Are you explicitly setting S =
On 2013-03-07 10:01, Jerrod Peach wrote:
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 2:43 PM, Hans Beckerus hans.becke...@gmail.com
mailto:hans.becke...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013-03-07 8:11, Jerrod Peach wrote:
Hans,
Are you sure you're seeing the patch system use $WORKDIR instead
of $S
On 2013-03-08 7:12, Eric Bénard wrote:
Hi Hans,
Le Fri, 8 Mar 2013 13:08:21 +0100,
Hans Beckérus hans.becke...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi. I have built some custom kernel modules (.ko) using a .bb that
inherits from the module.bbclass. There is one main kernel module and
the rest are dependent on
On 2013-03-08 7:12, Eric Bénard wrote:
Hi Hans,
Le Fri, 8 Mar 2013 13:08:21 +0100,
Hans Beckérus hans.becke...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi. I have built some custom kernel modules (.ko) using a .bb that
inherits from the module.bbclass. There is one main kernel module and
the rest are dependent on
Hi. Anyone started to look at including the FUSE user-space library as
part of Yocto?
Hans
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
On 2013-03-10 1:56, Philip Balister wrote:
On 03/09/2013 03:45 PM, Hans Beckerus wrote:
Hi. Anyone started to look at including the FUSE user-space library as
part of Yocto?
There are some fuse related recipes in meta-oe.
Philip
Ok, I will take a look. Is the meta-oe 100% compatible
On 2013-03-10 9:12, Khem Raj wrote:
On Mar 10, 2013, at 6:05 AM, Hans Beckerus hans.becke...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013-03-10 1:56, Philip Balister wrote:
On 03/09/2013 03:45 PM, Hans Beckerus wrote:
Hi. Anyone started to look at including the FUSE user-space library as
part of Yocto
On 2013-03-24 11:06, Jochen Trumpf wrote:
Hi Hans,
I am not subscribed to [yocto], just browsing it occasionally, so please
excuse the private email.
For this sort of thing I am using the following in my image recipe (stolen
from some gumstix image recipe in meta-gumstix-extras, danny branch):
On 2013-06-12 7:55, Flanagan, Elizabeth wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 6:05 AM, Hans Beckérus hans.becke...@gmail.com wrote:
In what way does LIC_FILES_CHKSUM correlate to what is specified in LICENSE?
LIC_FILES_CHKSUM *must* be specified unless LICENSE is set to CLOSED.
But, what if the
On 2013-08-28 6:06, Paul Eggleton wrote:
Hi Hans,
On Wednesday 28 August 2013 17:08:41 Hans Beckérus wrote:
Hi, I am a little bit confused about how to handle these two and what
they are supposed to solve. I have so far never used RDEPENDS but only
DEPENDS.
DEPENDS means a build-time
On 2013-09-17 5:09, Hans Beckérus wrote:
Hi. We are having som problems building our rootfs now that our custom
distro (based on poky-tiny) no longer includes wide character support
in libc.
Here is an example of the errors we get:
| arm-poky-linux-gnueabi-libtool: link:
On 2013-09-26 2:41, Hans Beckérus wrote:
Hi. Browsing through the existing recipes really did not answer this
since I have no clue what was the initial intent.
So my quick question is if a .inc file has a DEPENDS = foo and a
recipe that includes it has DEPENDS_class-native = fee, will the
On 2013-10-01 7:35, Khem Raj wrote:
On Oct 1, 2013, at 6:16 AM, Hans Beckérus hans.becke...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello. We have stumbled into a problem when using ld directly instead
of going through the gcc frontend.
A simple operation like this fails:
${CC} -c hello_world.c
${LD}
On 2013-11-05 11:10, Robert Calhoun wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Paul Eggleton paul.eggle...@linux.intel.com
AFAIK, there are two recommended values for SRCREV assuming you are
fetching
from an SCM at all:
A) A specific revision (SHA1 hash when fetching from git)
or
B)
On 2013-11-20 4:15, Hans Beckérus wrote:
The /etc/init.d/networking script is using sysctl to grab some
parameters from /etc/sysctl.conf. This file does not exists unless
procps is also installed.
I can not see that init-ifupdown RDEPENDS procps. Should it not? Or is
there a reason for not
15 matches
Mail list logo
