Just out of curiosity...
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
An alternative (and less intrusive) is to increase the commit timeout
on the build partition
How does one go about adjusting the commit timeout on a partition/disk?
Thank you.
These are interesting slides. As I was not able to attend the sessions in
Barcelona, I decided to follow along at home with the information posted
in this thread.
The slides pdf (ypdd_2012_barcelona_intro_hands_on_lab.pdf) describes the
first line of the contents of the
Okay, thanks for the comments.
I also want to highlight the change from task-core-boot to
packagegroup-core-boot for anyone wanting to try these steps on the
latest (although I'm not sure which string denzil prefers).
___
yocto mailing list
There have been many emails and lots of documentation describing how
to add a package to a build, and that's all great.
Today I was playing around with an image I had already built and
decided I wanted to add a new package to the mix: trace-cmd. I added
trace-cmd (with the required leading
, Nov 23, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Trevor Woerner twoer...@gmail.com wrote:
There have been many emails and lots of documentation describing how
to add a package to a build, and that's all great.
Today I was playing around with an image I had already built and
decided I wanted to add a new package
Thank you so much for having a crack at this. Your results have allowed me
to dig a bit deeper into this issue.
I'm still trying to narrow down the exact issue but here's what I have so
far.
I'm working with the git repository, but I've been playing around with this
for about a week, so I'm not
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 6:52 PM, Trevor Woerner twoer...@gmail.com wrote:
I haven't yet figured out if the PREFERRED_PROVIDER_virtual/kernel =
linux-yocto-rt line might be the culprit.
No, it is not related, this problem doesn't need any fancy
configuration features. This problem
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 5:39 AM, Eric Bénard e...@eukrea.com wrote:
I confirm the problem when following this procedure step by step.
Thank you, Eric, for the confirmation.
Just to clarify for anyone following along: the problem isn't with
bash or trace-cmd themselves. If I perform the same
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Robert P. J. Day
rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:
and ran the fetchall again. this time, no strace source was fetched,
so it looks like an issue with simple fetching.
Thank you for your testing and observations.
But I'd like to point out that in my tests, all
This issue has been entered into the yocto bugzilla as:
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3503
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
https://bugzilla.yoctoproject.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2934
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
Allow vmdk images to be run through the 'runqemu' facility.
---
scripts/runqemu | 39 +--
scripts/runqemu-internal | 20
2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/scripts/runqemu b/scripts/runqemu
index
Allow vmdk images to be run through the 'runqemu' facility.
Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner twoer...@gmail.com
---
scripts/runqemu | 39 +--
scripts/runqemu-internal | 20
2 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff
Hi Scott,
Thank you for reviewing my patch.
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 12:55 AM, Scott Garman scott.a.gar...@intel.com wrote:
This looks ok without having tested it personally. Could you just add a
signed-off-by line to the commit?
D'oh! Sorry about that. It has obviously been too long since I
Hi Darren,
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On 12/11/2012 01:05 PM, Trevor Woerner wrote:
Are per-image ROOTFS sizes (i.e. IMAGE_ROOTFS_SIZE_image) still
supported?
Interesting, I haven't tried myself. Have you tried and run into an issue?
Yes. I
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Darren Hart dvh...@linux.intel.com wrote:
What is the reason you would like to do this just for vmdk? Is it to
avoid increasing the size of all the images when it is only vmdk you
care about? That would makes sense.
Yes, that's it exactly. I have an existing
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:
so what happens if you try to set the appropriate variables above?
When Yocto creates a VMDK, it creates 2 partitions:
- an MSDOS partition for the syslinux stuff
- the ext{3,4} partition of your root image
When it
Hi Robert,
(we met at OLS last summer, I came and chatted with you briefly after
your presentation)
On Wed, Dec 12, 2012 at 5:03 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:
now i'm interested, so ... what are your config steps? i wouldn't
mind trying to reproduce this on my system.
Thank you, I enjoyed reading your document. I especially liked the top
part which talked about creating your own tasks (which 'turned the
light on' for how OE/Yocto use bitbake). I also wasn't aware of the
vim helpers which come as part of bitbake.
___
I'm not sure if there's something about my system that is different
than what you expect, but I had to delete my 'tmp' folder before
invoking './bin/bitbake firstrecipe -vDD' after inheriting the
autotool versions in order to get the new, overridden tasks to run
(since there's no 'clean' tasks).
Is there a chance this can get included?
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
I apologize if I'm pointing out the obvious and/or something you've
already tried.
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Andrea Galbusera giz...@gmail.com wrote:
After reading the manual I understand that the ${AUTOREV} method is
not working with cvs. Is there an alternative approach to instruct
On Thu, Dec 13, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Rifenbark, Scott M
scott.m.rifenb...@intel.com wrote:
we are revising the BitBake manual as part of the YP 1.4 release
Personally I think it would be great if the bitbake documentation
could be updated to include some of the information from Eren's
document as
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 2:16 PM, Zhang, Jessica jessica.zh...@intel.com wrote:
According to bug 1614, the kernel dev packages should be
included in sdk images. Please generate your toolchain using
bitbake core-image-sato-sdk -c populate_sdk which will
make the toolchain target sysroot matching
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 8:48 AM, Eddy Lai GMail eddy.lai...@gmail.com wrote:
how can I extend the
target system to use the rest USB disk space? ( it's FAT file system)
or how to modify configuration to force build the .hddimg create ~8GB
By default a certain amount of overhead is applied
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 3:58 PM, Rifenbark, Scott M
scott.m.rifenb...@intel.com wrote:
Can anyone out there offer more information on this variable? Wondering
whether this should be documented in the glossary.
By default bitbake will throw an error if there exists a *.bbappend
recipe for
Hi Frans,
On Fri, Feb 8, 2013 at 9:24 AM, Frans Meulenbroeks
fransmeulenbro...@gmail.com wrote:
There is also a default base_do_install() that is empty.
Wouldn't it be more logical if the base_do_install would read:
Currently people using only base, need to add a do_install to their recipe
Hi everyone,
I've looked at Tim's cheat sheet and Robert's FAQ but I can't seem to
figure out if there is a simple way to get bitbake to list the
packages that will be included in the build of a given image.
$ bitbake magic core-image-minimal
list of packages included in core-image-minimal image
Hi Pierre,
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:09 AM, Pierre Ficheux
pierre.fich...@openwide.fr wrote:
$ bitbake -g core-image-minimal
result in pn-buildlist.
Thank you, that works great on master.
This must be new-ish, the bitbake from my gumstix build (HEAD at
846b7c, or roughly Oct 11, 2012)
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:02 AM, Andre Bella scanc...@yahoo.com wrote:
is there a menuconfig on yocto where you can select the package you want to
add before you build the image?
I would suggest giving hob a try:
checkout the yocto project from git
$ source poky/oe-init-build-env
$ bitbake
I can't figure out what I'm doing wrong, but I can't get lab3 to work.
Following the instructions in the pdf I first tried doing lab3
incrementally (build/test, build/test, build/test) and it didn't work.
Then I tried deleting (tmp, sstate, etc), trying again, and it still
didn't work.
Build
Following up on a hunch, after reading Pierre Ficheux's email from
earlier today, I realized that by default I always switch my build's
PACKAGE_CLASSES to ipk simply because this packaging takes the least
amount of build time. Sure enough, when working on lab3 I had switched
to ipk and it didn't
Given that Greg KH has publicly stated linux-3.8 is not a long term
stable kernel, is it worth the effort to support it in Yocto?
http://www.kroah.com/log/linux/3.8-is_not_longterm_stable.html
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
Hi Paul,
I saw your email on the gumstix list but forgot to star it, and
therefore didn't get back to it as I would have liked, sorry about
that.
I too play around with a gumstix from time to time, as well as other
boards. In my (still learning) opinion, the gumstix stable build is
based on
I've been really blown away by the breadth of the Yocto Project; not
only will it help you create a distribution for a device but it can
also help you create things like a -dev image or a self-extracting
SDK.
Sometimes I like to work with a sub-Linux device, something that is
too small to run
Do you have git installed on your development machine?
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Paul D. DeRocco pdero...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
So I guess the questions are these: Are ext2, ext3 and ext4 all equally
likely to need to do an fsck after a disorderly shutdown? Do they
typically take different amounts of time to do an fsck? Or is the
journaling
I don't see any reason this conversation can't be on the public
mailing list. That way others can help and/or learn from the
discussion. I hope you don't mind be bringing it back to the mailing
list.
On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 11:32 AM, varun bhatnagar varun292...@gmail.com wrote:
YesI have...I
Hi Khem,
Thanks for adding your thoughts; you were exactly who I was hoping
would have input to my question :-)
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:59 AM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Sometimes I like to work with a sub-Linux device, something that is
too small to run Linux, or a device on which,
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 2:07 AM, Khem Raj raj.k...@gmail.com wrote:
We have moved away
from snapshots for gcc since git repo for gcc is in terabytes and
It sure would be nice if git had a feature whereby one could grab just
a specific snapshot without any history, or meta-information etc...
just
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 7:08 AM, Hans Beckérus hans.becke...@gmail.com wrote:
I
tried going through the module.bbclass but must admit I lost it
somewhere in the middle ;) Any guidance would be appreciated.
Have you had a chance to look at the Yocto hands-on kernel lab?
On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 12:15 PM, Chris Tapp opensou...@keylevel.com wrote:
In the 7 hours it's taken this to get to the list (no ideas where it got
stuck!)
I'm seeing emails arrive hours after their date-stamps too. In fact
this email just arrived in my inbox, but according to the date stamp,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 12:15 PM, David Mulder dmul...@lasx.com wrote:
but how can I make my run my code on that core?
You can call sched_setaffinity() before fork()ing your task, or use
taskset on the cmdline.
(sorry if this has already been answered but I'm not seeing any
responses due to
A new version of openSuSE has been released. What's the criteria for
determining that a given version of a distribution has been validated
for Yocto? What is required in order to add it to the list of valid
distirbutions?
___
yocto mailing list
I'm not sure if this is specific to my host, but:
Build Configuration:
BB_VERSION= 1.17.1
BUILD_SYS = x86_64-linux
NATIVELSBSTRING = openSUSE-project-12.3
TARGET_SYS= i586-poky-linux
MACHINE = qemux86
DISTRO= poky
DISTRO_VERSION=
Yes, thanks everyone. Pulling the latest fixes the problem.
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Martin Jansa martin.ja...@gmail.com wrote:
Please use better Subject next time, I was wondering what could be
broken by my patch to icecc and your question is quite unrelated to that
commit.
Something like neard failing to build with latest poky would be
I have been going through the archives from this list looking for
information to not only improve my build times but to make these
builds safer (there are hints dropped here and there that these large
builds are bad on disks which has me worried seeing that I use the
same disk+partition for both
The new autobuilder looks great! One thing that's nice is how easy it
is to look at the build and figure out from what commit the build is
based.
Clicking around in some of those builds, though, I can't seem to
figure out what the various configurations are. For example:
meta-fsl-arm has a number
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:05 AM, Eric Bénard e...@eukrea.com wrote:
in the build log
http://autobuilder.yoctoproject.org:8011/builders/nightly-fsl-arm/builds/18/steps/Building%20Images/logs/stdio
you can see it builds for imx53qsb :
MACHINE = imx53qsb
Thank you, now I see how to
I have looked at the output from a couple builds (nightly-fsl-arm,
nightly-fsl-ppc, nightly-mips) and had a couple questions.
Running poky/oe-init-build-env will produce a
build/conf/local.conf, but the nightly builder prefers to puts its
configurations into build/conf/auto.conf. Obviously
Thanks for all those answers.
On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:45 PM, Flanagan, Elizabeth
elizabeth.flana...@intel.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 8:31 AM, Trevor Woerner twoer...@gmail.com wrote:
Not all builds, but these three seem to follow similar steps:
1. prepare
2. configure+build core
[the following is meant to be humourous, please take it as such]
What I'm hoping to see in the next release is a better release name.
Male first names was the best suggestion? I recommend the next release
be named Dani, a female version of Danny, just to keep things
equal.
On Tue, Mar 26, 2013 at 2:37 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
Danni would be a terrible name
Of course it would be a terrible name, that's why I suggested it; I
figured it'd fit in with the others :-D
(don't forget my earlier statement about this being done in jest)
I'm kinda surprised Robert Day hasn't jumped in, I know he's got all
this straightened out :-)
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 10:10 PM, ChenQi qi.c...@windriver.com wrote:
In your case, you could add the following line to local.conf.
IMAGE_INSTALL_append += samba
I thought this was not the generally
If I expected that my audience would be mostly made up of people who
have been using *nix for years and are comfortable with the cmdline,
then I would show how I use Yocto/OE via the cmdline. If I expected
that most of them would be more accustomed to Eclipse/GUI-based
development, then I would
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Barros Pena, Belen
belen.barros.p...@intel.com wrote:
When we tried to define it properly, we realised that templates could be a
few different things, and that we should find out which of them is the
most useful. This email is my attempt to gather your thoughts
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 5:35 PM, Paul D. DeRocco pdero...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Somehow, it grates on me that underscore is used almost like an
operator in BitBake.
You're not alone!
Because the people who did this are reading this list ;-) I'll be
polite, it is clever, but even after a year of
On Tue, Apr 2, 2013 at 6:21 AM, Barros Pena, Belen
belen.barros.p...@intel.com wrote:
But it seems to me there is
more interesting stuff buried somewhere in your answer, so I hope it's ok
if I dig a little deeper.
:-D
I think I might have asked the wrong question. Let's forget about the word
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 6:42 PM, Sean Liming sean.lim...@annabooks.com wrote:
Why post-build instead of pre-build?
The idea is that you have one build, and you are manufacturing 5000 devices.
So you take this one build and load it on each of your identical
devices which you then sell to your
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Sean Liming sean.lim...@annabooks.com wrote:
Is this post-build utility an active
project for the Yocto Project or is it just getting started?
It's only in the discussion phase right now, hence the RFC in the
subject line.
Hi Robert,
Since you're working your way through the labs, I was wondering if
you'd be interested in testing something out for me? When I went
through these labs I had set my PACKAGE_CLASSES to package_ipk instead
of the default package_rpm. While doing so I had discovered a bug
which I reported,
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:29 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:
does this mean PACKAGE_CLASSES should be *exclusively* ipk, or that
ipk simply be in there?
Yes, that's how I had been testing it (exclusively package_ipk).
___
yocto
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:
ok, so what am i looking for?
I couldn't get lab3 to work fully unless I switched from package_ipk
to package_rpm. The module would get built and included in the image,
but it wasn't being loaded automatically during
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
I believe I tried and couldn't reproduce it. But if someone does
reproduce it, please file a bug detailing the *exact* steps needed to
reproduce.
Thanks for the update, I wasn't 100% sure if you had found the time to
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Trevor Woerner twoer...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I'll try reproducing this and post my results.
Now I've hit a snag. Since performing these tests, I have upgraded my
host system from openSUSE 12.2 to 12.3. Building qemu-native from the
HEAD (which uses qemu version
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca
wrote:
p.s. i was originally going to suggest the SEAD-3 as the next MIPS
board until he told me it cost $2K. ouch.
You clearly didn't read the marketing drivel closely enough:
The MIPS® SEAD™ -3 System engineering and
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Bruce Ashfield
bruce.ashfi...@windriver.com wrote:
Fixed. A few hours ago.
[...]
Known problem. And I've got a fix already tested and on it's way to
Richard.
Wow, one certainly does get service around here! :-)
___
On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 7:46 AM, Trevor Woerner twoer...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe I'm doing something wrong with git?
1.4_M5:860e758b7b7f27fbb47c645770593206c7453c1b
dylan:d80e663e209965073ff40fb775246eabc0159a44
___
yocto mailing list
yocto
If I start with
$ bitbake core-image-minimal
and then do
$ runqemu qemux86
a new window opens and qemu runs as expected (i.e. it pops open a new
window and runs in that and not via vnc).
If I then do
$ bitbake core-image-sato
and try
$ runqemu qemux86
I then get
Could
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Edward Vidal vidal.devel...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there any plans to provide a repo of pkgs where systems can be upgraded
and new pkgs installed like other distro Fedora, CentOS, and rhel? This
would also require yum or the new software that is replacing yum.
I
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Edward Vidal vidal.devel...@gmail.com wrote:
With that said how does Angstrom which uses opkg upgrades images that are
build with Angstrom.
Angstrom is a distribution, so it can make assumptions about how to
build a set of packages that will work on your system.
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:12 AM, Gary Thomas g...@mlbassoc.com wrote:
I also think it would be good to point out the use of := in the
FILESEXTRAPATHS
assignment and why it's important.
Knowing that the := operator will put your directories first is only
useful if you also know that the
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Rudolf Streif
rstr...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
If you do not have libsdl1.2-dev (Ubuntu) installed on your dev/host system
then qemu will be built without video support.
I would have assumed that if something was missing from my host, then
I would not have
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 12:50 AM, Rudolf Streif
rstr...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
Removing sstate triggered a rebuilt of qemu-native which also includes
running the configure task again whose output sets the switch whether or not
Qemu is built with video support. Apparently the first time you
Sorry if I'm asking a really stupid question, but if so, it means I'm
way off the mark :-)
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 6:23 AM, Gary Thomas g...@mlbassoc.com wrote:
My point, which was totally unclear to me when using this line, was
that with ':=' ${THISDIR} evaluates to the directory that contains
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca wrote:
first, it's not actually *required* that a layer name start with the
prefix meta-, is it? pretty sure it's not and, if it isn't, that
should be made abundantly clear. it's fine to point out that it's a
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 6:11 PM, Tom Zanussi tom.zanu...@intel.com wrote:
On Tue, 2013-04-09 at 18:06 -0400, Trevor Woerner wrote:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:46 PM, Robert P. J. Day rpj...@crashcourse.ca
wrote:
ok, so what am i looking for?
I couldn't get lab3 to work fully unless I
Another option is to start over again following these instructions:
https://github.com/gumstix/Gumstix-YoctoProject-Repo/blob/master/README.md
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https://lists.yoctoproject.org/listinfo/yocto
I'm quite sure there used to be a time when I could send a SIGTSTP to
bitbake
(usually by doing a Ctrl-Z) and it along with its children would suspend.
This
doesn't seem to be the case anymore. Maybe it just so happened that the
subprocesses finished quickly after I gave the Ctrl-Z and no new ones
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
What would be useful is a first boot task which resizes the rootfs to
fill the SD card it's on without prompts. Should be easy to do with a
postinst script and fdisk.
In my opinion, what would be even better:
- the build
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
Sounds great though it may take a long time to copy files to an SD
card (I noticed a similar opinion at
http://www.raspbian.org/RaspbianInstaller). May be quicker to generate
an image file with the correct size first
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Gary Thomas g...@mlbassoc.com wrote:
On 2013-05-02 09:52, Paul Barker wrote:
Sounds great though it may take a long time to copy files to an SD
card (I noticed a similar opinion at
http://www.raspbian.org/RaspbianInstaller). May be quicker to generate
an image
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 12:45 PM, Andrei Gherzan and...@gherzan.ro wrote:
On 2 May 2013 16:12, Trevor Woerner twoer...@gmail.com wrote:
- a separate tool (which will probably need to be run as root) is used
to actually format/create the SD device (using, say, sfdisk for
automation) this way
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:52 AM, Paul Barker p...@paulbarker.me.uk wrote:
Sounds great though it may take a long time to copy files to an SD
card (I noticed a similar opinion at
http://www.raspbian.org/RaspbianInstaller). May be quicker to generate
an image file with the correct size first
If every other distribution, over the next year, switched to python-3
as their default, but (instead of updating) future versions of Ubuntu
installed a symlink called python-3 pointing back to python-2, would
that hold back Yocto from adopting python-3-isms too?
It's sad how Ubuntu has so
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 8:45 AM, Richard Purdie
richard.pur...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
1.3.2
=
I've merged a lot of queued changes that Ross prepared for 1.3.2 and
this is now undergoing testing.
I have a patch for Danny to allow qemu-native of qemu-1.2.0 to compile
on openSuSE 12.3
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
I have a patch for Danny to allow qemu-native of qemu-1.2.0 to compile
on openSuSE 12.3 (which, apparently, is also affected by the same (or
a similar) DSO linking change that affects fedora). Are the queued
changes
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 6:35 AM, Burton, Ross ross.bur...@intel.com wrote:
On 7 May 2013 18:57, Trevor Woerner twoer...@gmail.com wrote:
I've looked through the list of patches and don't seem to find
anything that will do what my patch needs to do in order to build
qemu-1.2.0 on openSuSE 12.3
Hi,
The Yocto Project Development Manual, section 3.2.2 (Source Control
Management (SCM)) states that:
Git is a distributed system that is easy to
backup (each checkout is a backup in itself)
I'm not 100% sure a checkout would be considered a backup. I think
most people would say that a clone
After a build, the license data is found in ${TMPDIR}/deploy/licenses not
${TMPDIR}/deploy/images/licenses.
Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner twoer...@gmail.com
---
documentation/dev-manual/dev-manual-newbie.xml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/documentation/dev
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:37 PM, Bryan Evenson beven...@melinkcorp.com wrote:
# Added KBRANCH spec
KBRANCH = linux-3.9-at91
# Override SRC_URI in a bbappend file to point at a different source
#
tree if you do not want to build from Linus' tree.
SRC_URI =
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Paul D. DeRocco pdero...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Shouldn't gcc-cross be described as a cross
package rather than a native, and shouldn't gcc-crosssdk be described as a
native binary that runs on the target? Or am I still fundamentally
misinterpreting these things?
On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Paul D. DeRocco pdero...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
For now, I really just need to know if I'm interested in the SDK, since I
have no intention of ever running compilations on my target system.
Imagine a company which produces embedded devices running Linux. There
are
I think this is an excellent project and am excited to see it coming together.
Are the meetings open for participation? I can't guarantee that I'd be
available when you run them, but I wouldn't mind listening in if I am.
If I were writing a book about Yocto/OE, in the first chapter I would
have
Coincidentally, Nicolas and I were recently involved in providing a
whirlwind tour of Yocto/OE to some developers last week.
On 20 June 2013 04:40, Rifenbark, Scott M scott.m.rifenb...@intel.com wrote:
We can get started now on this by starting to define details for some obvious
points or
Has anyone else heard of vimcasts.org?
Short, concise, detailed screen-casts of specific Yocto tasks coupled
with show notes, I think, would be an awesome other way of
delivering this information.
yoctocasts.org anyone?
___
yocto mailing list
On 23 June 2013 00:01, Trevor Woerner trevor.woer...@linaro.org wrote:
Has anyone else heard of vimcasts.org?
http://vimcasts.org/episodes/archive
is a good example of what I'm thinking about.
___
yocto mailing list
yocto@yoctoproject.org
https
Hi Rudi,
On 24 June 2013 01:41, Rudolf Streif rstr...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
If I were writing a book about Yocto/OE,
This is a project I am currently working on, a book about the Yocto Project.
Awesome! That's great news! I was hoping someone would beat me to it
:-) I look forward to
Based on observations from the various mailing lists, it is obvious that
bugzilla issues are almost always referenced using square brackets.
Signed-off-by: Trevor Woerner trevor.woer...@linaro.org
---
documentation/dev-manual/dev-manual-newbie.xml | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
1 - 100 of 481 matches
Mail list logo
