I'll 3'rd that...
It would be great.
But from what I see so far, as a very new person here, it appears that
the developers have a very definite mind of their own as to what YJ
should do, and/or, not do. Maybe I'm wrong, but they don't seem to
pay much attention to the desires of their
I vote for it as well.
On May 20, 2008, at 9:25 AM, John wrote:
I vote for that feature.
On May 19, 2008, at 1:00 PM, Phil Emery wrote:
It would be cool if one could make smart collections by type (say
just PDFs, or just docs, etc) .
I would think it would be pretty straightforward as YJ
I vote for that feature.
On May 19, 2008, at 1:00 PM, Phil Emery wrote:
It would be cool if one could make smart collections by type (say
just PDFs, or just docs, etc) .
I would think it would be pretty straightforward as YJ already has
that info for each entry in it's database.
--
It would be cool if one could make smart collections by type (say
just PDFs, or just docs, etc) .
I would think it would be pretty straightforward as YJ already has
that info for each entry in it's database.
--
--
This
On 5/19/08 at 4:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Phil Emery) wrote:
It would be cool if one could make smart collections by type (say
just PDFs, or just docs, etc) .
I would think it would be pretty straightforward as YJ already has
that info for each entry in it's database.
The factory default
