On 5-Apr-08, at 4:19 PM, Doug Ransom wrote:
Angry - no - why would I be angry? Annoyed I am not getting the
utility out of Time Machine I would expect, and disturbed all my
files archived in Yojimbo are in one big opaque file - yes.
(broken record reply, sorry)
It's unfortunate that
On 4-Apr-08, at 3:02 PM, Rich Siegel wrote:
I suggest BareBones consider moving their data store out of the
sqlite
database and store Yojimbo entries onto the file system. The time
machine backups are getting rather large when the whole database is
backed up.
At the risk of sounding like
On Apr 5, 2008, at 5:45 PM, Doug Ransom wrote:
On 4-Apr-08, at 3:02 PM, Rich Siegel wrote:
I suggest BareBones consider moving their data store out of the
sqlite
database and store Yojimbo entries onto the file system. The time
machine backups are getting rather large when the whole
Didn't mean to be prescriptive. I am not a programmer and could care
less about core data or whatever. Certainly I have some understanding
of technology and it seems bizarre that no release has been
forthcoming that plays well with Time Machine - it certainly is an
indication Core Data
Doug,
The types of Core Data stores currently available are XML, SQLite,
Custom Atomic, and In Memory (which must be binary) on Wikipedia.
The XML store is best used for debugging since it's just a text file
that is human readable. It could be used for storing small amounts of
data, but
Hmm,
I'm new to this. I'd like Yj to update only what was changed, but it
sounds as if the available options don't allow that. I think Doug
(correct me if I am wrong) was wanting just such a thing to keep up
efficient use of disk space--the cheapness of price is relative :) My
Yj backup
