Re: Happy with Yojimbo the way it is!

2008-05-02 Thread Krzysztof Maj
On 2008-05-01, at 04:44, Charlie Garrison wrote: Good afternoon, On 30/4/08 at 5:31 PM -0400, Luis Roca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With that said I’m going to make a non-feature request to the Bare Bones/Yojimbo team : Please don’t include a nested folder feature in the next or any

Re: Almost happy with Yojimbo the way it is

2008-05-02 Thread Dennis
On May 2, 2008, at 5:06 AM, Jan Rychter wrote: When the focus is in the collections panel, pressing tab should take me to the list of documents, not to the little buttons below the collections panel. [snip] Next TAB should go to the title, then tags, then content (NOT to the rarely used

Re: Almost happy with Yojimbo the way it is

2008-05-02 Thread infrahile
Thanks for your response Steve, great to have some direct answers from the guy who kicked it all off :o) Now, naturally, I want more! :o) In the past I've drawn a distinction between 'nested folders' and a means to group collections in the sidebar. I see these as distinct things and I've

Re: Almost happy with Yojimbo the way it is

2008-05-01 Thread Charlie Garrison
Good afternoon, On 1/5/08 at 12:04 AM -0400, Jerry Weldon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In other words, I want to be able to have multiple self-contained library databases. This would not add any complexity whatsoever for those who like Yojimbo the way it is--they can simply continue using one

Re: Happy with Yojimbo the way it is!

2008-05-01 Thread Krzysztof Maj
On 2008-05-01, at 04:44, Charlie Garrison wrote: Good afternoon, On 30/4/08 at 5:31 PM -0400, Luis Roca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With that said I’m going to make a non-feature request to the Bare Bones/Yojimbo team : Please don’t include a nested folder feature in the next or any

Re: Almost happy with Yojimbo the way it is

2008-05-01 Thread Rhet Turnbull
There is another software package, can't recall the name of it right now, which will manage multiple prefs/databases/whatever for programs that are rooSwitch http://roobasoft.com/rooSwitch/ --Rhet On 5/1/08, Charlie Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good afternoon, On 1/5/08 at 12:04 AM

Re: Almost happy with Yojimbo the way it is

2008-05-01 Thread Steve Kalkwarf
I'm not singling out Rhet, but there are several ideas embodied in this paragraph that bear comment: If someone from BareBones does pipe in, it's usually to say We're never going to add that feature. See previous post... This compares poorly to several other indie-Mac software lists I'm on

Re: Almost happy with Yojimbo the way it is

2008-05-01 Thread Sherman Wilcox
On May 1, 2008, at 7:20 AM, Steve Kalkwarf wrote: If you made it this far, thanks for reading. As your reward, a summary of the popular requests, and their status: In fact, it's the first post I've read FULLY for quite a while. Thanks! Updates to other Bare Bones products: What do you

[admin] Re: Almost happy with Yojimbo the way it is

2008-05-01 Thread Patrick Woolsey
Sorry for the interruption, but as a reminder, this is *Yojimbo-Talk* :-) Regards, Patrick Woolsey == Bare Bones Software, Inc.http://www.barebones.com P.O. Box 1048, Bedford, MA 01730-1048 Sherman Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] sez: On May 1, 2008, at 7:20 AM, Steve

Re: Almost happy with Yojimbo the way it is

2008-05-01 Thread Mark Smith
On 01. May. 08, at 17:04 , Steve Kalkwarf wrote: For reasons far to detailed to go into, multiple libraries and .Mac syncing cannot co-exist. Trust me on this one. This is interesting. Is this a (current) limitation of .mac syncing that is associated with SQL CoreData libraries ? I can

Re: Almost happy with Yojimbo the way it is

2008-05-01 Thread Lorin Rivers
On May 1, 2008, at 8:20 AM, Steve Kalkwarf wrote: snip If you made it this far, thanks for reading. As your reward, a summary of the popular requests, and their status: Nested folders: Sorry, no. Smart collections: Yes, near the top of the list. Better tagging interactions:

Effective Feature Requesting (Was: Happy with Yojimbo the way it is!)

2008-05-01 Thread Lorin Rivers
On Apr 29, 2008, at 6:54 PM, Keith Ledbetter wrote: On Apr 29, 2008, at 1:41 PM, Scott J. Lopez wrote: I see a lot of messages out there requsting Yojimbo did a lot of things it doesn't and I just want to tell the developers I'm quite happy with Yojimbo the way it is. I think Yojimbo

Re: Effective Feature Requesting (Was: Happy with Yojimbo the way it is!)

2008-05-01 Thread Scott J. Lopez
For the people who complain it doesn't have XXX feature, did you only notice this after your free 30 day trial period was over? There really is no logical reason someone can complain they bought the product but can't use it effectively because it didn't have XXX. For those who sent Yojimbo to the

Re: Happy with Yojimbo the way it is!

2008-05-01 Thread Michael Klouda
Lists like these are easy places for people who are very happy with an program to start building wish lists and even discuss shortcomings and workarounds. I don't think the people on this list are unhappy with Yojimbo in anyway. Really, how can they be? It is an excellent program and one

Re: Happy with Yojimbo the way it is!

2008-05-01 Thread david
It's partly inertia - using what you know. The Finder has nested folders, we all understand nested folders. We understand how to use nested folders to solve a problem...ergo we ask for nested folders to solve similar problems in Yojimbo. Frankly, until I started using tags in the Finder I

Re: Effective Feature Requesting (Was: Happy with Yojimbo the way it is!)

2008-05-01 Thread Rhet Turnbull
I don't want to fuel a flame war so I'll shut up after this message! BTW, I do appreciate Steve from BareBones adding his thoughts and I don't mind him picking on me! It's nice to know the developer is listening to the list even if I don't like some of their design choices. In my post I

Re: Happy with Yojimbo the way it is!

2008-05-01 Thread Kenneth Kirksey
On May 1, 2008, at 4:28 PM, david wrote: Even now I'm not convinced that tabs are the logical replacement for nested folders. A useful tool, yes - but a replacement? I'm not convinced yet. When Yojimbo first came out I thought the lack of nested folders was a limitation. It took me a

Re: Happy with Yojimbo the way it is!

2008-04-30 Thread Carlton Gibson
I see a lot of messages out there requsting Yojimbo did a lot of things it doesn't and I just want to tell the developers I'm quite happy with Yojimbo the way it is. I love Yojimbo as it is too! Perhaps it needs to say at the top of the viewer window, Not a replacement for Finder.app

Re: Happy with Yojimbo the way it is!

2008-04-30 Thread Claude
: On Apr 29, 2008, at 1:41 PM, Scott J. Lopez wrote: I see a lot of messages out there requsting Yojimbo did a lot of things it doesn't and I just want to tell the developers I'm quite happy with Yojimbo the way it is. I think Yojimbo is a fine little application, too. It's just a shame that because

Re: Happy with Yojimbo the way it is!

2008-04-30 Thread n . kobschaetzki
of things it doesn't and I just want to tell the developers I'm quite happy with Yojimbo the way it is. I think Yojimbo is a fine little application, too. It's just a shame that because it lacks one feature (nested collections) I had to delete it from my hard drive. I keep monitoring

Re: Happy with Yojimbo the way it is!

2008-04-30 Thread Kenneth Kirksey
On Apr 30, 2008, at 7:41 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But I even refrained from testing other apps because I have absolutely no idea how I get all my data with meta-data (tags, urls) from yojimbo into other apps. How would you solve it when you would decide to move? When I got Leap

Re: Happy with Yojimbo the way it is!

2008-04-30 Thread cubic . archon
On 29 Apr 2008, at 19:38, Scott J. Lopez wrote: Krzysztof, my message wasn't directed at you specificlly but in response to the many I wish Yojimbo did... messages I've seen over the years on this list. Yojimbo is a nice, small application that was meant for organizing some specific types of

Re: Happy with Yojimbo the way it is!

2008-04-30 Thread Ron Kubsch
with Yojimbo the way it is. I think Yojimbo is a fine little application, too. It's just a shame that because it lacks one feature (nested collections) I had to delete it from my hard drive. I keep monitoring online, and I keep hoping that one day that needed feature will be added. People

Re: Happy with Yojimbo the way it is!

2008-04-30 Thread David G. Simmons
I'm quite happy with Yojimbo the way it is. I think Yojimbo is a fine little application, too. It's just a shame that because it lacks one feature (nested collections) I had to delete it from my hard drive. I keep monitoring online, and I keep hoping that one day that needed feature

Re: Happy with Yojimbo the way it is!

2008-04-30 Thread Luis Roca
I'm really glad someone spoke up for Yojimbo! (Thanks Scott) I've been getting tired of seeing this list become a dump for what people don't like about Yojimbo and move away from being a helpful resource. I have no problem with feature requests but It's been absolutely over the top in the last few

Re: Happy with Yojimbo the way it is!

2008-04-30 Thread Charlie Garrison
Good afternoon, On 30/4/08 at 5:31 PM -0400, Luis Roca [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: With that said I’m going to make a non-feature request to the Bare Bones/Yojimbo team : Please don’t include a nested folder feature in the next or any future releases of Yojimbo. PLEASE!!! How refreshing,

Re: Almost happy with Yojimbo the way it is

2008-04-30 Thread Rhet Turnbull
In other words, I want to be able to have multiple self-contained library databases. You might want to try Eagle Filer: http://c-command.com/eaglefiler/ It is similar to Yojimbo but supports multiple libraries and nested folders. It also stores its data as regular files in the filesystem

Happy with Yojimbo the way it is!

2008-04-29 Thread Scott J. Lopez
I see a lot of messages out there requsting Yojimbo did a lot of things it doesn't and I just want to tell the developers I'm quite happy with Yojimbo the way it is. Maybe a few bugs need to be fixed but please don't give in to feature creep and try to make Yojimbo the kitchen sink application. I

Re: Happy with Yojimbo the way it is!

2008-04-29 Thread Krzysztof Maj
On 2008-04-29, at 19:41, Scott J. Lopez wrote: I see a lot of messages out there requsting Yojimbo did a lot of things it doesn't and I just want to tell the developers I'm quite happy with Yojimbo the way it is. Maybe a few bugs need to be fixed but please don't give in to feature creep

Re: Happy with Yojimbo the way it is!

2008-04-29 Thread Scott J. Lopez
of messages out there requsting Yojimbo did a lot of things it doesn't and I just want to tell the developers I'm quite happy with Yojimbo the way it is. Maybe a few bugs need to be fixed but please don't give in to feature creep and try to make Yojimbo the kitchen sink application. I keep Yojimbo

Re: Happy with Yojimbo the way it is!

2008-04-29 Thread Keith Ledbetter
On Apr 29, 2008, at 1:41 PM, Scott J. Lopez wrote: I see a lot of messages out there requsting Yojimbo did a lot of things it doesn't and I just want to tell the developers I'm quite happy with Yojimbo the way it is. I think Yojimbo is a fine little application, too. It's just a shame