On 2008-05-01, at 04:44, Charlie Garrison wrote:
Good afternoon,
On 30/4/08 at 5:31 PM -0400, Luis Roca [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
With that said I’m going to make a non-feature request to the Bare
Bones/Yojimbo team : Please don’t include a nested folder feature
in the
next or any
On May 2, 2008, at 5:06 AM, Jan Rychter wrote:
When the focus is in the collections panel, pressing tab should take
me
to the list of documents, not to the little buttons below the
collections panel.
[snip]
Next TAB should go to the title, then tags, then content (NOT to the
rarely
used
Thanks for your response Steve, great to have some direct answers
from the guy who kicked it all off :o)
Now, naturally, I want more! :o)
In the past I've drawn a distinction between 'nested folders' and a
means to group collections in the sidebar. I see these as distinct
things and I've
Good afternoon,
On 1/5/08 at 12:04 AM -0400, Jerry Weldon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In other words, I want to be able to have multiple
self-contained library databases. This would not add any
complexity whatsoever for those who like Yojimbo the way it
is--they can simply continue using one
On 2008-05-01, at 04:44, Charlie Garrison wrote:
Good afternoon,
On 30/4/08 at 5:31 PM -0400, Luis Roca [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
With that said I’m going to make a non-feature request to the Bare
Bones/Yojimbo team : Please don’t include a nested folder feature
in the
next or any
There is another software package, can't recall the name of it right now,
which will manage multiple prefs/databases/whatever for programs that are
rooSwitch
http://roobasoft.com/rooSwitch/
--Rhet
On 5/1/08, Charlie Garrison [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good afternoon,
On 1/5/08 at 12:04 AM
I'm not singling out Rhet, but there are several ideas embodied
in this paragraph that bear comment:
If someone from BareBones does pipe in, it's usually to say
We're never going to add that feature. See previous post...
This compares poorly to several other indie-Mac software lists
I'm on
On May 1, 2008, at 7:20 AM, Steve Kalkwarf wrote:
If you made it this far, thanks for reading. As your reward, a
summary of the popular requests, and their status:
In fact, it's the first post I've read FULLY for quite a while. Thanks!
Updates to other Bare Bones products: What do you
Sorry for the interruption, but as a reminder, this is *Yojimbo-Talk* :-)
Regards,
Patrick Woolsey
==
Bare Bones Software, Inc.http://www.barebones.com
P.O. Box 1048, Bedford, MA 01730-1048
Sherman Wilcox [EMAIL PROTECTED] sez:
On May 1, 2008, at 7:20 AM, Steve
On 01. May. 08, at 17:04 , Steve Kalkwarf wrote:
For reasons far to detailed to go into, multiple libraries and .Mac
syncing cannot co-exist. Trust me on this one.
This is interesting. Is this a (current) limitation of .mac syncing
that is associated with SQL CoreData libraries ? I can
On May 1, 2008, at 8:20 AM, Steve Kalkwarf wrote:
snip
If you made it this far, thanks for reading. As your reward, a
summary of the popular requests, and their status:
Nested folders: Sorry, no.
Smart collections: Yes, near the top of the list.
Better tagging interactions:
On Apr 29, 2008, at 6:54 PM, Keith Ledbetter wrote:
On Apr 29, 2008, at 1:41 PM, Scott J. Lopez wrote:
I see a lot of messages out there requsting Yojimbo did a lot of
things it doesn't and I just want to tell the developers I'm quite
happy with Yojimbo the way it is.
I think Yojimbo
For the people who complain it doesn't have XXX feature, did you only
notice this after your free 30 day trial period was over? There really
is no logical reason someone can complain they bought the product but
can't use it effectively because it didn't have XXX.
For those who sent Yojimbo to the
Lists like these are easy places for people who are very happy with an
program to start building wish lists and even discuss shortcomings and
workarounds. I don't think the people on this list are unhappy with
Yojimbo in anyway. Really, how can they be? It is an excellent program
and one
It's partly inertia - using what you know. The Finder has nested
folders, we all understand nested folders. We understand how to use
nested folders to solve a problem...ergo we ask for nested folders to
solve similar problems in Yojimbo.
Frankly, until I started using tags in the Finder I
I don't want to fuel a flame war so I'll shut up after this message!
BTW, I do appreciate Steve from BareBones adding his thoughts and I
don't mind him picking on me! It's nice to know the developer is
listening to the list even if I don't like some of their design
choices. In my post I
On May 1, 2008, at 4:28 PM, david wrote:
Even now I'm not convinced that tabs are the logical replacement for
nested folders. A useful tool, yes - but a replacement? I'm not
convinced yet.
When Yojimbo first came out I thought the lack of nested folders was a
limitation. It took me a
I see a lot of messages out there requsting Yojimbo did a lot of
things it doesn't and I just want to tell the developers I'm quite
happy with Yojimbo the way it is.
I love Yojimbo as it is too!
Perhaps it needs to say at the top of the viewer window, Not a
replacement for Finder.app
:
On Apr 29, 2008, at 1:41 PM, Scott J. Lopez wrote:
I see a lot of messages out there requsting Yojimbo did a lot of
things it doesn't and I just want to tell the developers I'm quite
happy with Yojimbo the way it is.
I think Yojimbo is a fine little application, too. It's just a
shame that because
of
things it doesn't and I just want to tell the developers I'm quite
happy with Yojimbo the way it is.
I think Yojimbo is a fine little application, too. It's just a
shame that because it lacks one feature (nested collections) I had
to delete it from my hard drive. I keep monitoring
On Apr 30, 2008, at 7:41 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I even refrained from testing
other apps because I have absolutely no idea how I get all my data
with meta-data (tags, urls) from yojimbo into other apps. How would
you solve it when you would decide to move?
When I got Leap
On 29 Apr 2008, at 19:38, Scott J. Lopez wrote:
Krzysztof, my message wasn't directed at you specificlly but in
response to the many I wish Yojimbo did... messages I've seen over
the years on this list.
Yojimbo is a nice, small application that was meant for organizing
some specific types of
with Yojimbo the way it is.
I think Yojimbo is a fine little application, too. It's just a
shame that because it lacks one feature (nested collections) I had
to delete it from my hard drive. I keep monitoring online, and I
keep hoping that one day that needed feature will be added. People
I'm quite
happy with Yojimbo the way it is.
I think Yojimbo is a fine little application, too. It's just a
shame that because it lacks one feature (nested collections) I had
to delete it from my hard drive. I keep monitoring online, and I
keep hoping that one day that needed feature
I'm really glad someone spoke up for Yojimbo! (Thanks Scott) I've been
getting tired of seeing this list become a dump for what people don't
like about Yojimbo and move away from being a helpful resource. I have
no problem with feature requests but It's been absolutely over the top
in the last few
Good afternoon,
On 30/4/08 at 5:31 PM -0400, Luis Roca
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With that said I’m going to make a non-feature request to the Bare
Bones/Yojimbo team : Please don’t include a nested folder feature in the
next or any future releases of Yojimbo. PLEASE!!!
How refreshing,
In other words, I want to be able to have multiple self-contained
library databases.
You might want to try Eagle Filer: http://c-command.com/eaglefiler/
It is similar to Yojimbo but supports multiple libraries and nested
folders. It also stores its data as regular files in the filesystem
I see a lot of messages out there requsting Yojimbo did a lot of
things it doesn't and I just want to tell the developers I'm quite
happy with Yojimbo the way it is. Maybe a few bugs need to be fixed
but please don't give in to feature creep and try to make Yojimbo
the kitchen sink application. I
On 2008-04-29, at 19:41, Scott J. Lopez wrote:
I see a lot of messages out there requsting Yojimbo did a lot of
things it doesn't and I just want to tell the developers I'm quite
happy with Yojimbo the way it is. Maybe a few bugs need to be fixed
but please don't give in to feature creep
of messages out there requsting Yojimbo did a lot of
things it doesn't and I just want to tell the developers I'm quite
happy with Yojimbo the way it is. Maybe a few bugs need to be fixed
but please don't give in to feature creep and try to make Yojimbo
the kitchen sink application. I keep Yojimbo
On Apr 29, 2008, at 1:41 PM, Scott J. Lopez wrote:
I see a lot of messages out there requsting Yojimbo did a lot of
things it doesn't and I just want to tell the developers I'm quite
happy with Yojimbo the way it is.
I think Yojimbo is a fine little application, too. It's just a shame
31 matches
Mail list logo
