Re: Wish: smart collections by type

2008-05-22 Thread John
I'll 3'rd that... It would be great. But from what I see so far, as a very new person here, it appears that the developers have a very definite mind of their own as to what YJ should do, and/or, not do. Maybe I'm wrong, but they don't seem to pay much attention to the desires of their

Re: Wish: smart collections by type

2008-05-21 Thread Jason Carman
I vote for it as well. On May 20, 2008, at 9:25 AM, John wrote: I vote for that feature. On May 19, 2008, at 1:00 PM, Phil Emery wrote: It would be cool if one could make smart collections by type (say just PDFs, or just docs, etc) . I would think it would be pretty straightforward as YJ

Re: Wish: smart collections by type

2008-05-20 Thread John
I vote for that feature. On May 19, 2008, at 1:00 PM, Phil Emery wrote: It would be cool if one could make smart collections by type (say just PDFs, or just docs, etc) . I would think it would be pretty straightforward as YJ already has that info for each entry in it's database. --

Re: Wish: smart collections by type

2008-05-19 Thread Rich Siegel
On 5/19/08 at 4:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Phil Emery) wrote: It would be cool if one could make smart collections by type (say just PDFs, or just docs, etc) . I would think it would be pretty straightforward as YJ already has that info for each entry in it's database. The factory default