On Tue, 2009-05-05 at 22:33 +0200, Krister Jarl wrote: ... > >They got more than one thing wrong though - correct formatting would > >include a leading whitespace on the second line too. > > > >Contact : <sip:s...@192.168.0.2>,\r\n sip:s...@192.168.0.3\r\n > > > >I note that they ALSO missed the comma. A bit much to fix at the > >receiving end instead of at the sending end, don't you think? > > > > Yes, of course. But if the line break were correct shouldn't the second > row be interpreted as a new header (possibly an extension header)?
Yes, a new header - not another value of the Contact header. And sip:s...@192.168.0.3 is not a valid SIP header that I know of at least =). /Fredrik _______________________________________________ Yxa-devel mailing list Yxa-devel@lists.su.se https://lists.su.se/mailman/listinfo/yxa-devel
