Re: [zapps-wg] Eliminating the possibility of backdoors with high probability

2017-11-16 Thread Peter Todd via zapps-wg
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 08:26:04PM -0700, Sean Bowe wrote: > > Q: What exactly happens if one participant fails to destroy that secret > > and/or > > inputs a low-entropy secret? What about N participants? > > > > The paper states that "We show that security holds even if an adversary has > >

Re: [zapps-wg] Eliminating the possibility of backdoors with high probability

2017-11-13 Thread Peter Todd via zapps-wg
On Mon, Nov 13, 2017 at 02:16:18PM -0700, Sean Bowe via zapps-wg wrote: > There are three ways that a participants' toxic waste can be compromised: > > 1. the participant is dishonest and keeps the toxic waste around > 2. the toxic waste is extracted from the machine, either from a side > channel