On Friday, April 15, 2011 11:38:17 PM Cyril Hrubis wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > After getting _good_ power supply, I was able to untar and rm ltp tree
> > 100 times so far. 2.6.38, ext3. (So metan no, I do not see any weird
> > ext3 problems).
>
> Hmm, I'm using original adapter, but who knows if it's okay
Hi!
> After getting _good_ power supply, I was able to untar and rm ltp tree
> 100 times so far. 2.6.38, ext3. (So metan no, I do not see any weird
> ext3 problems).
Hmm, I'm using original adapter, but who knows if it's okay to use...
> Another strange thing is... I see lots of duplicated keystr
Hi!
> >> > mmc0: error -95 whilst initialising SD card
> >>
> >> That's interesting. Would you mind trying to bisect? (Knowing whether
> >> 2.6.38 final does it, for example, would be very helpful.)
> >
> > It may need one or two tries on 2.6.38 but it's there too.
> >
> >> There aren't many -EO
Hi!
After getting _good_ power supply, I was able to untar and rm ltp tree
100 times so far. 2.6.38, ext3. (So metan no, I do not see any weird
ext3 problems).
Another strange thing is... I see lots of duplicated keystrokes --
like type "pavel" but machine understands "paavel". But it only seems
Andrea Adami wrote:
> Hello,
>
> now that we are running 2.6.38 kernels can we move to the new event
> based zaurusd [1]?
> Any particular drawback?
They are feature incompatible.
RP zaurusd/switchevd:
Screen rotation in X
Audio plug insert/remove
Some ugly hacks to control backlight
Metan zaur
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 2:17 PM, Andrea Adami wrote:
> Same failure with 2.6.38 on c7x0 / akita / spitz.
>
> Ideas?
>
> Andrea
>
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: Andrea Adami
> Date: Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 10:33 AM
> Subject: Re: mtd-utils - issues with flash_eraseall -j
> To: ope
reading following lines from linux-arm-kernel [2] I wonder if we
could have zaurusd as driver in kernel tree...
"
...
> Since this is a one-off kind of thing, a singleton driver that controls
> power, reset and some GPIO on the chip. I contemplate moving the
> stuff to either:
>
> drivers/misc/ux
Hello,
now that we are running 2.6.38 kernels can we move to the new event
based zaurusd [1]?
Any particular drawback?
Regards
Andrea
[1] http://metan.lindevdoc.org/git/?p=zaurusd.git/.git;a=summary
___
Zaurus-devel mailing list
Zaurus-devel@lists.l