Hi!1
>>> Yes, but in that case you might as well just purchase a coulomb
>>> counter with a built-in accumulator and an I2C/SPI/microwire interface
>>> save yourself some PCB space and cost (maybe)
Hardware is already given.
>> Well, Pavel attempts to implement a "poor man's Coulomb counter" or
On Mon 2009-12-14 12:12:47, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 02:24:14PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
>
> > > actual charger hardware. My main concern here is that battery
> > > performance monitoring has no pressing need to be in kernel and that
> > > pushing it into the kernel creates a
On 12/15/09 23:32, Somebody in the thread at some point said:
Hi -
Yes, but in that case you might as well just purchase a coulomb
counter with a built-in accumulator and an I2C/SPI/microwire interface
save yourself some PCB space and cost (maybe)
Well, Pavel attempts to implement a "poor man
Aras Vaichas wrote:
> Yes, but in that case you might as well just purchase a coulomb
> counter with a built-in accumulator and an I2C/SPI/microwire interface
> save yourself some PCB space and cost (maybe)
Well, Pavel attempts to implement a "poor man's Coulomb counter" or at
least "poor man's A
2009/12/15 Bill Gatliff :
> Aras Vaichas wrote:
>> Unfortunately the simple coulomb counting chips have the disadvantage
>> that the CPU has to be running to accumulate the pulses. Of course,
>> the pulses could wake the CPU from a suspend mode, but I'd rather not
>> do that just to add "one" to a
Aras Vaichas wrote:
> Unfortunately the simple coulomb counting chips have the disadvantage
> that the CPU has to be running to accumulate the pulses. Of course,
> the pulses could wake the CPU from a suspend mode, but I'd rather not
> do that just to add "one" to a counter ...
>
Could you have
2009/12/15 Pavel Machek :
> Hi!
>
>> > > I'm not sure how familiar you are with the issues surrounding trying to
>> > > do a voltage to charge mapping for a battery but it's much more complex
>> > > than a simple table if you want to get it accurate. There's a lot
>> > > of
>>
>> > Well... current
Hi!
> > > I'm not sure how familiar you are with the issues surrounding trying to
> > > do a voltage to charge mapping for a battery but it's much more complex
> > > than a simple table if you want to get it accurate. There's a lot
> > > of
>
> > Well... current zaurus kernels use _huge_ table t
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 02:24:14PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > actual charger hardware. My main concern here is that battery
> > performance monitoring has no pressing need to be in kernel and that
> > pushing it into the kernel creates a barrier to implementing more
> > advanced schemes in us
Hi!
> > If you browse down to line 275 you can see it parse the sysfs
> > attribute "capacity", then this propagates up to the battery
> > status indicator on *all* Android phones out there. So if
> > you want to run Android unmodified, this is what you need to
> > provide. They are effectively us
10 matches
Mail list logo
