Re: [zd1211-devs] Problem with new Abocom WUG2690

2007-07-15 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi Tom, Atheros supposedly contacted Abocom about this to make sure that Abocom stop using 07b8:6001 for ZD1211B devices (this has historically been a ZD1211 ID). We still don't have a way of determining whether a device is ZD1211 or ZD1211B before firmware load time, except for USB ID, which

Re: [zd1211-devs] Problem with new Abocom WUG2690

2007-06-29 Thread Daniel Drake
Tom Hunter wrote: I did check the ZD1211 chip markings and can confirm that they are different (one lot are ZD1211 and the other are ZD122B) yet same USB ID. OK, thanks. ZyDAS would like to know whether these devices were ordered directly from Abocom, or if they were from the retail market.

[zd1211-devs] Problem with new Abocom WUG2690

2007-06-25 Thread Tom Hunter
I am using the Abocom WUG2690 wireless USB module with Linux 2.6.21.1 with the zd1211 driver from the latest 2.6.21.5. It appears that Abocom is using a mix of ZD1211 and ZD1211B chips without assigning a different USB vendor/device-ID. The bulk of devices I see use a ZD1211B. I have changed