On Thu, Jul 25, 2019 at 09:35 -0700, Jonathan Siwek wrote:
> My main reason for preferring alpha/beta is "it's less different than
> before", otherwise don't have much argument against dev/rc.
Let's just do dev/rc then, seems that's what more people prefer. And
then we'll go ahead with your
I like -dev and -rc more as well. -alpha on the master branch seems weird to
me. I feel like alpha implies we actually did an official branched release, and
not just commits from the main line where we’re doing development.
Tim
> On Jul 25, 2019, at 8:12 AM, Robin Sommer wrote:
>
> Using
Using "3.1.0-X" would also feel semantically a bit confusing I think
as we'd be changing the meaning of a scheme we're already using.
I like the idea of using "dev.X" and "rcX". I was originally feeling
similar about "alpha" but the sorting is a nice property to have.
Swtiching from "beta" to
