And thus my suggestion to return only the event logs and optional another
dict of the uris and their metadata
2009/8/2 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
> 2009/8/2 Siegfried Gevatter :
> > SNIP...
> > What I think we really need to decide now is how we want to represent
> > events and items (when return
2009/8/2 Siegfried Gevatter :
> SNIP...
> What I think we really need to decide now is how we want to represent
> events and items (when returned by FindEvents et all).
I think you hit the nail on the head here. I think the current Zg API
leaves a blurry line for what Zeitgeist actually is. If we
Siegfried had a very nice idea of having two arrays as a return
one with all the eventinfos and one with all the iteminfos
this way we need to query the info of the events as well of the items only
once
2009/8/2 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
> 2009/8/2 Seif Lotfy :
> > SNIP ...
> > FindEvents howeve
2009/8/2 Seif Lotfy :
> SNIP ...
> FindEvents however will retrun the EventInfo dict as well as the following
> dict (How we do it will be optimized i have a solution for that)
It needs to be an array of item dicts. An event can have several targets.
--
Cheers,
Mikkel
__
2009/8/2 Seif Lotfy :
> FindEventsOnly will return 1 dict with the eventinfo
What's the use case for that?
--
Siegfried-Angel Gevatter Pujals (RainCT)
Ubuntu Developer. Debian Contributor.
___
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~zeitgeist
Post to
Most of the magic is the expiring tags crap and some similar usages and
tags!
However my main concern now is we have to move along and not depend on the
fact that tracker wants to release! Give me a release and then we can see if
we can depend on it!
Let us concentrate with our current tools and r
Hey,
I have to admit I haven’t looked at Tracker yet (so maybe once I see
it I may change my opinion), but at the moment my idea is that once
Tracker supports events (so that we can store everything in there and
don’t need to keep events in our own database, which wouldn’t work
performance-wise gi
Hi guys!
I read the blogpost yesterday and I must say I think we are doing ok!
If we concentrate that the engine does nothing but log events the problem is
not as big as we think it is. Using DBus we can write extension that extend
the metadata we have about our items.
I don't see a full rewrite
Hi Zeitgeisters!
I wrote a longish blog post spilling my brains with a lot of Zeitgeist
thoughts I've been brewing in my head lately. Maybe it is completely
bonkers - http://www.grillbar.org/wordpress/?p=345, or how do you guys
feel?
Don't get me wrong - I don't want to throw the baby out with th
9 matches
Mail list logo
