[Zeitgeist] [Bug 486996] Re: testInsertGetWithoutTimestamp testcase fails

2009-11-23 Thread Markus Korn
** Changed in: zeitgeist Status: New = Triaged -- testInsertGetWithoutTimestamp testcase fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/486996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Zeitgeist-Engine, which is the registrant for Zeitgeist Engine. Status in Zeitgeist Engine:

[Zeitgeist] [Bug 486996] Re: testInsertGetWithoutTimestamp testcase fails

2009-11-23 Thread Seif Lotfy
We should not even allow empty timestamps in. But if you guys think we should then an empty timestamp means we should generate one using time.time() and insert it into the DB. What do u think? -- testInsertGetWithoutTimestamp testcase fails https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/486996 You received

Re: [Zeitgeist] [Bug 486996] Re: testInsertGetWithoutTimestamp testcase fails

2009-11-23 Thread Seif Lotfy
@Mikkel: OK I get ur point :) 2009/11/23 Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen mikkel.kamst...@gmail.com @Seif: I wouldn't have to care about the timestamp format when sending events if my app doesn't need high precision timing. Just create the Event instance and send it along. Recall that not all apps