Hello Practitioners,
For years I have mentioned that we filter all information with our
limited brain, or that our knowledge are partial and incomplete. What I
have come to realize recently was, that was only half of the problem.
The other half of the problem was from inside of ourselves.
The fact that we insist on the any part of our knowledge to be the
absolute truth, no matter how weak or how tiny, is a sign of our
internal struggle. Since language and knowledge is relative and
interpretive, they are not absolute and can't survive the test of time.
Forms are impermanent. This impermanence includes our knowledge, the
languages itself as well as our trust to it.
So look inward, which part of our know how that we are "afraid" of let
go? My way or the high way? My view or else?
How about our relationships, our accomplishments, our expertise, our
practice, our dharma?
Is our peace conditional and protected. Or is it open and naked?
I remember someone wrote that Buddhaland is right beyond our comfort
zone. Well?
Thank you for your time.
JM
------------------------------------
Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are
reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Zen_Forum/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
