Re: [Zen] Mindfulness pt 2

2011-01-02 Thread Rev. Joriki Dat Baker
For JM, these are two,  not two and exactly two. So we must watch we do not to 
cling to the one or other. Flexibility arises without effort but is secondary 
to the cause. With  common eyes we can not see and the fluidity that is needed 
falls moot. Touching and feeling in the dark, where is this liberating way. It 
is only after our mind settles, and we release that which binds us that we lay 
wake to these briars that fell from Buddha’s playful lips, and now true shadows 
do we see. Shunyata is not bound, it is the essence of the Tathagarba, IT IS 
“empty”; however, within its emptiness all is possible – the ultimate 
potentiality is revealed. All things are marked by emptiness and at their core 
there is no lasting marks or attributes. In truth, Shunyata is everything and 
yet nothing/ no-thing. I hear in these text much talk of the difficulty of 
using these words such as “mindfulness” - so I pose we do not. I pose we 
experience our own path and stop worrying about what to call it. Much needs to 
be done my friends and time is short. 

Adidaphat!

  Joriki

From: Jue Miao Jing Ming - 覺妙精明 
Sent: Saturday, January 01, 2011 12:02 PM
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com 
Cc: zenliv...@yahoogroups.com ; chan-socal-engl...@googlegroups.com 
Subject: [Zen] Mindfulness pt 2

  
Happy New Year Ed,

Propose another word in place of mindfulness is a very challenging task.  Let 
me explain.

In the practice and dealing with everyday life, we say Be aware but not 
attached to, focus but not focusing, observe but not observing, are some 
of the terms we use while we translate from our Chinese text to English.  In 
other words, sync to the universal wisdom at every moment, and not be attached 
to the meaning of the phenomena.  is the phrase we need to represent with a 
single word.

The most common general terms as a verb in the practice, we use are be aware, 
 sense, feel, etc. i.e. sense our breathing, feel the chakra.   They 
are usually terms applying also to emotions, feelings as well as our general 
overall well being, physical and spiritual.  We can not separate our true 
feeling from our body or mind.

We are very careful not to consistently use the same word.  Especially the 
practice to notice the conditions of our body, mind and spirit, could require 
different verb for a similar function.  Chan teaching requires flexibility.  

The purpose of Chan wordings are nothing but to wake up the practitioner, and 
not to set a path or a rule to follow.  After 5,000 words, Diamond Sutra said 
only one thing, Whatever you think it is, it is not.  It just is.

Perhaps a  lot of times, I am guilty in becoming lazy and just say, Shut up, 
Sit down and Stop thinking.
LOL.


Be Enlightened In This Life - We ALL Can
http://chanjmjm.blogspot.com
http://www.heartchan.org

On 1/1/2011 7:37 AM, ED wrote: 


  JM,

  What is your proposed definition of  'mindfulness'?

  --ED



  --- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Jue Miao Jing Ming - 覺妙精明 
mailto:chan.j...@... wrote:
  
  Thank you JDB.  Indeed we also teach emptiness of mind.

  Somehow the western Zen is stuck on the label of mind and would not let 
go.  There is even a seminar about the small mind and big mind.  Though all 
journeys lead to the same place.

  Mind is too close to thinking.  It can be easily misunderstood and 
misinterpreted.

  We teach empty your mind, enhance your heart.  And we continue to say 
because heart is where we could unify our body, mind and spirit.

  Somehow, unify our body to the same physical structure as the universe is not 
emphasized in western Zen.  Most of the reading that I have encountered with 
focuses mainly on the mind and its awareness, not on the body and little on the 
spirit.  Though we constantly talked about body, mind and spirit, but in 
essence, they are one and inseparable.  Just like the universe.

  In our school, awareness does not reside in the mind. Awareness is a function 
of our spirit, which reside in our heart.  Heart is not the organic heart, 
but our total well being, our center or ONE.  Awareness enhancement 
helps us to be awakened to the Absolute Awareness of the universe.

  This brings this post to another question. What does Zen say about our 
spirit?  Our spiritual levels, our spiritual being, spiritual karma, the sixth, 
seventh and eighth consciousness?

  After several years with this forum, I have read little about these.  In 
other words, to be enlightened, we need to surpass karmic hindrance of body, 
mind and spirit.  We need to work on all three.

  Otherwise, we are just imagining and hoping.

  On this New Year Day, I hope this post is not too objectionable to ALL.

  Happy New Year and thank you for your patience and understanding for all the 
years.
  JMJM
  Head Teacher
  Order Of Chan


Be Enlightened In This Life - We ALL Can
http://chanjmjm.blogspot.com
http://www.heartchan.org

  On 12/31/2010 10:12 PM, Rev. Joriki Dat Baker wrote: 
 
Or the emptiness

Re: [Zen] Mindfulness pt 2

2011-01-02 Thread Jue Miao Jing Ming - 覺妙精明

JDB,

Indeed.  I love the way you write.  Please continue to support this forum.

A bow

Be Enlightened In This Life - We ALL Can
http://chanjmjm.blogspot.com
http://www.heartchan.org


On 1/1/2011 6:10 PM, Rev. Joriki Dat Baker wrote:


For JM, these are two,  not two and exactly two. So we must watch we 
do not to cling to the one or other. Flexibility arises without effort 
but is secondary to the cause. With  common eyes we can not see and 
the fluidity that is needed falls moot. Touching and feeling in the 
dark, where is this liberating way. It is only after our mind settles, 
and we release that which binds us that we lay wake to these briars 
that fell from Buddha’s playful lips, and now true shadows do we see. 
Shunyata is not bound, it is the essence of the Tathagarba, IT IS 
“empty”; however, within its emptiness all is possible – the ultimate 
potentiality is revealed. All things are marked by emptiness and at 
their core there is no lasting marks or attributes. In truth, Shunyata 
is everything and yet nothing/ no-thing. I hear in these text much 
talk of the difficulty of using these words such as “mindfulness” - so 
I pose we do not. I pose we experience our own path and stop worrying 
about what to call it. Much needs to be done my friends and time is 
short.

Adidaphat!
  Joriki
*From:* Jue Miao Jing Ming - 覺妙精明 mailto:chan.j...@gmail.com
*Sent:* Saturday, January 01, 2011 12:02 PM
*To:* Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com mailto:Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com
*Cc:* zenliv...@yahoogroups.com mailto:zenliv...@yahoogroups.com ; 
chan-socal-engl...@googlegroups.com 
mailto:chan-socal-engl...@googlegroups.com

*Subject:* [Zen] Mindfulness pt 2

Happy New Year Ed,

Propose another word in place of mindfulness is a very challenging 
task.  Let me explain.


In the practice and dealing with everyday life, we say Be aware but 
not attached to, focus but not focusing, observe but not 
observing, are some of the terms we use while we translate from our 
Chinese text to English.  In other words, sync to the universal 
wisdom at every moment, and not be attached to the meaning of the 
phenomena.  is the phrase we need to represent with a single word.


The most common general terms as a verb in the practice, we use are 
be aware,  sense, feel, etc. i.e. sense our breathing, feel 
the chakra.   They are usually terms applying also to emotions, 
feelings as well as our general overall well being, physical and 
spiritual.  We can not separate our true feeling from our body or mind.


We are very careful not to consistently use the same word.  Especially 
the practice to notice the conditions of our body, mind and spirit, 
could require different verb for a similar function.  Chan teaching 
requires flexibility.


The purpose of Chan wordings are nothing but to wake up the 
practitioner, and not to set a path or a rule to follow.  After 5,000 
words, Diamond Sutra said only one thing, Whatever you think it is, 
it is not.  It just is.


Perhaps a  lot of times, I am guilty in becoming lazy and just say, 
Shut up, Sit down and Stop thinking.

LOL.

Be Enlightened In This Life - We ALL Can
http://chanjmjm.blogspot.com
http://www.heartchan.org

On 1/1/2011 7:37 AM, ED wrote:



JM,

What is your proposed definition of  'mindfulness'?

--ED

--- In Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com, Jue Miao Jing Ming - 覺妙精明 
mailto:chan.j...@... wrote:


Thank you JDB.  Indeed we also teach emptiness of mind.

Somehow the western Zen is stuck on the label of mind and would not 
let go.  There is even a seminar about the small mind and big mind.  
Though all journeys lead to the same place.


Mind is too close to thinking.  It can be easily misunderstood 
and misinterpreted.


We teach empty your mind, enhance your heart.  And we continue to 
say because heart is where we could unify our body, mind and spirit.


Somehow, unify our body to the same physical structure as the 
universe is not emphasized in western Zen.  Most of the reading that 
I have encountered with focuses mainly on the mind and its awareness, 
not on the body and little on the spirit.  Though we constantly 
talked about body, mind and spirit, but in essence, they are one and 
inseparable.  Just like the universe.


In our school, awareness does not reside in the mind. Awareness is a 
function of our spirit, which reside in our heart.  Heart is not 
the organic heart, but our total well being, our center or 
ONE.  Awareness enhancement helps us to be awakened to the 
Absolute Awareness of the universe.


This brings this post to another question. What does Zen say about 
our spirit?  Our spiritual levels, our spiritual being, spiritual 
karma, the sixth, seventh and eighth consciousness?


After several years with this forum, I have read little about 
these.  In other words, to be enlightened, we need to surpass karmic 
hindrance of body, mind and spirit.  We need to work on all three.


Otherwise, we are just imagining and hoping.

On this New Year