RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-16 Thread BillSmart
[mailto:zen_fo...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Anthony Wu Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 11:24 AM To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God Chris, There are strict rules governing material world, down to subatomic particles. I tend to believe the same applies

RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-16 Thread Anthony Wu
: billsm...@hhs1963.org billsm...@hhs1963.org Subject: RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Date: Friday, 16 January, 2009, 5:52 PM Anthony, I believe the everything is haphazard (chaos - the original meaning) and we all are free to kill, rob, rape, drink and burn without

RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-16 Thread BillSmart
Of Anthony Wu Sent: Friday, January 16, 2009 10:02 PM To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God Bill, Nobody asks you to answer to them. If you always do the second group of actions, that is great. Can you tell me the secret why you are not tempted to switch to the first

Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-15 Thread Edgar Owen
@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God Bill, How can you cry, 'ouch' to an illusion. So it is not. Before you reach nirvana(to which I hope you are just around the corner), or whatever you call it, you are still in samsara. A lot of things are real there, including suffering. Once

RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-15 Thread BillSmart
Subject: RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God Bill, I understand your 'zen logic' in view of a lack of a proper word. In my case: - If I run into a killer, I will run away, scared to death. - If I am starving, I will suffer a lot, complaining about bad karma. Understanding your action cannot be my

Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-15 Thread Edgar Owen
, January 15, 2009 2:04 PM To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God Bill, I understand your 'zen logic' in view of a lack of a proper word. In my case: - If I run into a killer, I will run away, scared to death. - If I am starving, I will suffer a lot, complaining

Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-15 Thread Edgar Owen
Subject: RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God Bill, I understand your 'zen logic' in view of a lack of a proper word. In my case: - If I run into a killer, I will run away, scared to death. - If I am starving, I will suffer a lot, complaining about bad karma. Understanding your action

Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-15 Thread Edgar Owen
Chris, But samurai training consists of a great number of 'what if' scenarios. Edgar On Jan 15, 2009, at 2:54 PM, cid830 wrote: Edgar, I'm sure you needed that lesson on the samarai! LOL. My point, in Bill's defense, was that this is not comparable to his response to Anthony's questions.

RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-15 Thread Anthony Wu
...@hhs1963.org Subject: RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Date: Thursday, 15 January, 2009, 11:22 PM Anthony, I will try to answer your question which I assume is: 'What would you do if confronted with someone who was threatening your life? I can absolutely

RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-15 Thread BillSmart
Owen Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 10:45 PM To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God Bill, The samurai prepares for such a situation in advance. Do you claim he can't then act from Buddha Nature when the time comes? Just the opposite, by preparing his body

RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-15 Thread BillSmart
Owen Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2009 8:11 PM To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God Bill, There are illusions and there are illusions. The veils of illusion are multiple and myriad. Some are easy to penetrate, others impossible as they are artifacts of our existence

Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-15 Thread Anthony Wu
Physical pain was obvious. Whether mental was also present I don't know.   Anthony --- On Fri, 16/1/09, Edgar Owen edgaro...@att.net wrote: From: Edgar Owen edgaro...@att.net Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Date: Friday, 16 January, 2009, 8:22 AM

Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-15 Thread Anthony Wu
...@att.net Subject: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Date: Friday, 16 January, 2009, 8:52 AM I would like to help, Anthony. But I've got nothing. Science has theories. Some proven, some not. I would like to believe in karma. But I'm more inclined to believe

Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-15 Thread Jue Miao Jing Ming - 覺妙精明
Hi Al, why do you say unfortunately? what do you have in mind? JM fitness4u2163 wrote: Jue Miao Jing Ming -In our school, karma is just a label for any energy that causes Good or bad are just human interpretations of the result after the fact. It is not a believe system or a reward system.

RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-14 Thread Anthony Wu
billsm...@hhs1963.org Subject: RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Date: Wednesday, 14 January, 2009, 9:59 AM Anthony and Mike, I'm jumping into this discussion to say that I still am not getting posts from Mike. I read his post attached to this post (Anthony's

Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-14 Thread Anthony Wu
Uerusuboyo wa nan desuka? --- On Wed, 14/1/09, mike brown uerusub...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: From: mike brown uerusub...@yahoo.co.uk Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Date: Wednesday, 14 January, 2009, 4:57 PM Oops! Sorry, I forgot to include Mike

RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-14 Thread Anthony Wu
.   Anthony --- On Wed, 14/1/09, billsm...@hhs1963.org billsm...@hhs1963.org wrote: From: billsm...@hhs1963.org billsm...@hhs1963.org Subject: RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Date: Wednesday, 14 January, 2009, 9:59 AM OUCH! From: zen_fo...@yahoogrou ps.com

Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-14 Thread Edgar Owen
is killing your friend? Do you help him, or just stand by and see him killed? Anthony --- On Wed, 14/1/09, billsm...@hhs1963.org billsm...@hhs1963.org wrote: From: billsm...@hhs1963.org billsm...@hhs1963.org Subject: RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Date: Wednesday

RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-14 Thread BillSmart
[mailto:zen_fo...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Anthony Wu Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 6:02 PM To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God Bill, I fully agree with all you say, but on condition that we live in paradise on earth, like in the USA, or your part of Thailand

RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-14 Thread BillSmart
To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God Bill, How can you cry, 'ouch' to an illusion. So it is not. Before you reach nirvana(to which I hope you are just around the corner), or whatever you call it, you are still in samsara. A lot of things are real there, including

RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-13 Thread BillSmart
PM To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God Bill, Good question! My answer is that justification is not by God, Allah, Brahman, Bill or Anthony. It is by karma. If I kill somebody, I create karma that will come back to me someday to result in a very bad

Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-13 Thread Anthony Wu
advanced' practitioners. Is this a Buddhism? Of course, there is a place for playboys in this world, but not in a monastry, I think.   Anthony --- On Tue, 13/1/09, fitness4u2163 fitness1...@yahoo.com wrote: From: fitness4u2163 fitness1...@yahoo.com Subject: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God To: Zen_Forum

RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-13 Thread Anthony Wu
, and suffer from all kinds of pain. Are they illusory?   Anthony --- On Tue, 13/1/09, billsm...@hhs1963.org billsm...@hhs1963.org wrote: From: billsm...@hhs1963.org billsm...@hhs1963.org Subject: RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Date: Tuesday, 13 January, 2009, 6:14

RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-13 Thread BillSmart
is the basic tenant of Buddhism. What books have you been reading lately? ...Bill! From: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com [mailto:zen_fo...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Anthony Wu Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 6:08 PM To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God Bill, Yes, I

RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-13 Thread BillSmart
Owen Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 8:21 PM To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God Bill, You are actually saying that aspects of the objective world are not illusory! I'm amazed. That is not Buddhism, Buddhism states that everything, that is all forms, are illusory

Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-13 Thread Jue Miao Jing Ming - 覺妙精明
] Re: The Reason For God Bill, You are actually saying that aspects of the objective world are not illusory! I'm amazed. That is not Buddhism, Buddhism states that everything, that is all forms, are illusory. I think you just shot your own Buddha nature in the foot! Care to clarify

Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-13 Thread Edgar Owen
] Re: The Reason For God Bill, You are actually saying that aspects of the objective world are not illusory! I'm amazed. That is not Buddhism, Buddhism states that everything, that is all forms, are illusory. I think you just shot your own Buddha nature in the foot! Care to clarify

Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-13 Thread Anthony Wu
of a dog, for fear of hurting the maggots and the dog (this may be a myth, but is representative of certain thinkings)   What do you think of them?   Anthony --- On Tue, 13/1/09, mike brown uerusub...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: From: mike brown uerusub...@yahoo.co.uk Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-13 Thread Jue Miao Jing Ming - 覺妙精明
Of Edgar Owen Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 8:21 PM To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God Bill, You are actually saying that aspects of the objective world are not illusory

RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-13 Thread BillSmart
of a dog, for fear of hurting the maggots and the dog (this may be a myth, but is representative of certain thinkings) What do you think of them? Anthony --- On Tue, 13/1/09, mike brown uerusub...@yahoo.co.uk wrote: From: mike brown uerusub...@yahoo.co.uk Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-13 Thread BillSmart
OUCH! From: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com [mailto:zen_fo...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Anthony Wu Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 5:23 AM To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God Bill, I am not reading any books at this moment. I am reading your posts. How

RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-13 Thread BillSmart
@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God Hi Bill, It hasn't been hard to 'transcend the plane' of some of the recent discussions! :-) Edgar Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are reading! Talk about it today

Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-13 Thread Jue Miao Jing Ming - 覺妙精明
%40yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Anthony Wu Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2009 5:44 AM To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com mailto:Zen_Forum%40yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God Mike, Please give me specific examples of what an advanced zen practitioner can do, after 'breaking through

Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-13 Thread Jue Miao Jing Ming - 覺妙精明
Hi Al, What I have experienced about hurting others is that I will either get sick or get a head ache or some kind of discomfort in different levels. Many practitioners in our school can sense, transfer and eliminate karma. In our school, karma is just a label for any energy that causes

RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-12 Thread BillSmart
...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of fitness4u2163 Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 1:31 AM To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God Anthony Wu Since we all have the same Buddha mind, everything we do is justified. That's what I don't agree with, as I see that there are opposing

Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-11 Thread mike brown
Hi Chris, I haven't been posting here for a while so it's good to be back to catch up with all the usual suspects! I couldn't help noticing your comment that you think Buddha-Nature is inherent in all of us. This is view that seems to contradict a fundamental tenet of Buddhism - that there is

Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-09 Thread Anthony Wu
Subject: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Date: Friday, 9 January, 2009, 1:31 AM What I believe is that we live in a dualistic world. Our minds attach to forms in a dualistic way. If you can break your attachment to this dualism and dissolve your Ego, you can get in touch

RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-09 Thread Anthony Wu
Subject: RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Date: Friday, 9 January, 2009, 8:09 AM Anthony, I'm not advocating you sit on a pillow forever. Formal sitting with a teacher is a good way to learn to do zazen, but like anything else after you've learned the basics you

RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-09 Thread BillSmart
Chris, You asked: Your statement is always great and sweet. It feels like a carrot. Al is carrying a stick. Are you two in the same performance in two different characters? My response is: yes - but isn't that true for all of us? If we all do indeed share the same Buddha Mind then aren't we

Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-09 Thread Anthony Wu
Most words are hollow. --- On Sat, 10/1/09, fitness4u2163 fitness1...@yahoo.com wrote: From: fitness4u2163 fitness1...@yahoo.com Subject: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Date: Saturday, 10 January, 2009, 9:50 AM cid830 I know it may sound like I don't have a clue

RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-09 Thread Anthony Wu
do is justified.   Anthony --- On Sat, 10/1/09, billsm...@hhs1963.org billsm...@hhs1963.org wrote: From: billsm...@hhs1963.org billsm...@hhs1963.org Subject: RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Date: Saturday, 10 January, 2009, 10:00 AM Chris, You asked: Your

RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-09 Thread BillSmart
...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Anthony Wu Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2009 9:10 AM To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God Both yours and Al's answer are very acceptable. On the other hand, I have yet to prove the idea of 'Buddha mind' came from historical Buddha. It may have

RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-09 Thread BillSmart
Subject: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God I'm sure many things ring hollow, when your empty inside. Current Book Discussion: any Zen book that you recently have read or are reading! Talk about it today!Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go

RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-08 Thread Anthony Wu
] On Behalf Of fitness4u2163 Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2009 11:13 AM To: zen_fo...@yahoogrou ps.com Subject: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God cid830 I don't have to rely on my faith to carry me into the promised land, after I die! The Kingdom of Heaven is among us! That is as much a fantasy

RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-08 Thread BillSmart
[mailto:zen_fo...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Anthony Wu Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 10:54 PM To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God Are you advocating that we should all just sit on a pillow until it stinks, and that is all? That is why I say no suffering

Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-06 Thread Anthony Wu
So instead you prefer zen buddhism, where every koan is open to interpretation and most of it is totally undefined and completely subjective depending on who the teacher is. That is basically the way the world is. Everything must be open to interpretation. The book you mention seems to

Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-06 Thread Vince
Subject: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God Vince There is way to much ambiguity for me. So instead you prefer zen buddhism, where every koan is open to interpretation and most of it is totally undefined and completely subjective depending on who the teacher is. HO HO HO

Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-06 Thread Vince
Excellent point, indeed. From: cid830 summitj...@att.net To: Zen_Forum@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, January 6, 2009 11:08:19 AM Subject: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God I know you didn't ask me, but... I prefer Zen Buddhism because it is a direct way

Re: [Zen] Re: The Reason For God

2009-01-05 Thread Vince
I guess this is where I've run into problems with general Christianity. Some of the bible is open to interpretation. Some of it is not. Some of it must be strictly followed. Some of it you CAN'T follow. There is way to much ambiguity for me. I have found