Ok the first question is i am back to zero, so now when my scripts are working
i am able to send messages, the question of cleaning comes.
i am using the following code for the forwarder and i think thats correct, but
when i kill the process which is running the forwarder the SIGTERM signal is
Hello All,
In one of my past threads i got the zmq device forwarder working, now my exact
use case is like i have arbitrary no of publishers and subscribers.
First i start the ZMQ forwarder device, than i am starting the subscribers and
than a single publisher to send the message.
My
First of all I'd like to say hello to everyone, since this is my first
post here. So:
Hello,
I've been trying to integrate ZeroMQ with libev event loop and I've
hit a strange behavior (or a bug?). In particular, as anyone
integrating with event loop, I've been watching (libev calls it like
that)
The guide is full of wonderful and useful cases, but there is one that appears
to be missing. For some applications there are lots of clients generating and
one collector.
The clients typically generate data like statistics or information (like a
temperature sensor)
that occurs periodically.
You could PUSH/PULL. You could also use ROUTER/DEALER, but I think
PUSH/PULL is all you actually need.
Basically the collector should bind as PULL and clients should connect to
it with PUSH sockets. Then all the clients send PUSH when they have
something to send and the collector receives
Ronald,
Do i need to close forwarder again and than start after each message sent by
the publisher, or can i do something like i can start the forwarder first and
next publisher check if the forwarder is running than just leverage the
forwarder to send some messages to the subscriber.
No
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Stephen Hemminger
shemmin...@vyatta.com wrote:
The guide is full of wonderful and useful cases, but there is one that appears
to be missing. For some applications there are lots of clients generating and
one collector.
The clients typically generate data like
19.03.2012 19:53, Johnny Gozde пишет:
Boris,
Socket options are exposed as properties on the Socket type. Please try
setting the zmqSocket.HWM property directly. e.g.,
zmqSocket.HWM = 1;
For me - not. I believe I'm using and old version of the binding. Can it
be true?
Hello Cornelius ,
Thanks again and it will work for sure.
Next and probably last question is why my sockets are not cleaned up in the
forwarder, i try something like https://gist.github.com/2132163 but the handler
is never fired.
just to inform you i kill the python interpreter to close
I forked and edited the gist with my changes and comments. I'm not really sure
what's wrong, but you may be having a scope problem:
https://gist.github.com/2138347
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/423379/using-global-variables-in-a-function-other-than-the-one-that-created-them
incoming,
Hi all,
This is a request for one or more people to volunteer as
co-maintainers of CZMQ. Note that the job requires just the ability to
merge pull requests and respect process. You don't actually have to
write or review code.
The goal is to get CZMQ conformant with the C4 process
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:19 AM, Boris Gulay bo...@boressoft.ru wrote:
For me - not. I believe I'm using and old version of the binding. Can it
be true?
It's entirely possible. The latest stable version of clrzmq is 2.2.2,
downloadable from GitHub: https://github.com/zeromq/clrzmq/downloads
Hi Pieter,
I am the author of a Ruby binding against czmq (
https://github.com/methodmissing/rbczmq ), am very familiar with the API
and have an ongoing interest in it being compatible with libzmq and libxs
releases.
I would be open to maintain / review and manage process around contribution.
-
Hi all,
this is my first post to this list, so hi, I'm Steffen. Quite some time
ago, I wrote the original Perl bindings for 0MQ, though the current Perl
module's been rewritten and maintained by Daisuke Maki.
I've always felt that writing applications with many components talking
to one
Lourens,
Great, what's your github login?
-Pieter
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Lourens Naudé
lour...@methodmissing.com wrote:
Hi Pieter,
I am the author of a Ruby binding against czmq (
https://github.com/methodmissing/rbczmq ), am very familiar with the API and
have an ongoing
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:05 PM, Steffen Mueller
m...@steffen-mueller.net wrote:
I'd be really happy to get some feedback on both the ZMQ::Declare
library and the suggestions regarding the ZDCF spec.
First off, it's really nice to see someone picking up the ZDCF specs
and running with them.
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:13 AM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:49 AM, Stephen Hemminger
shemmin...@vyatta.com wrote:
The guide is full of wonderful and useful cases, but there is one that
appears
to be missing. For some applications there are lots of
Hi Pieter,
Github handle: methodmissing
- Lourens
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:20 PM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
Lourens,
Great, what's your github login?
-Pieter
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Lourens Naudé
lour...@methodmissing.com wrote:
Hi Pieter,
I am the author
Lourens,
OK, you're now added! Please read http://rfc.zeromq.org/spec:16 since
that is our goal (the RFC can of course change as we find aspects that
are wrong).
-Pieter
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Lourens Naudé
lour...@methodmissing.com wrote:
Hi Pieter,
Github handle: methodmissing
Hmmm i tried using your code but , its not working too. :-(
Regarding PyZMQ version i am using pyzmq 2.1.11 which have same version of
libzmq i guess. And i am on a 64 bit windows machine.
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 12:44:57 -0500
From: cornelius.to...@gmail.com
To: zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
Signals are a unix concept. Not that I would know, but I'm guessing
there is some funkyness with the way python signals work on Windows as
this blog post implies:
http://danielkaes.wordpress.com/2009/06/04/how-to-catch-kill-events-with-python/
In the Linux world catching “kill events” would be
21 matches
Mail list logo
