Hello MinRK and all,
Again i am getting an issue with unicode with python 3 i thing they have
something different with relevant to unicode, so i use something like:
self.receivingSocket = self.zmqContext.socket(zmq.PUB)
self.receivingSocket.connect(self._forwaderpubaddress)
Hi,
has anyone had success in connecting via Javascript using Websockets
to a serverside PHP ZeroMQ socket/server?
Basically I am using Rasmus server code from
http://toys.lerdorf.com/archives/57-ZeroMQ-+-libevent-in-PHP.html
which works (I changed the socket tcp address so that outside
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:45 PM, Max nas...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
has anyone had success in connecting via Javascript using Websockets
to a serverside PHP ZeroMQ socket/server?
Basically I am using Rasmus server code from
http://toys.lerdorf.com/archives/57-ZeroMQ-+-libevent-in-PHP.html
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 15:27, Ian Barber ian.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
You're trying to connect a websockets client to a ZeroMQ socket, that is not
going to work (Rasmus's example is just showing you how to use libevent with
ZMQ). You need something serving the websockets side and shuffling
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:50 PM, Dan Fairs dan.fa...@gmail.com wrote:
I've used node.js with socket.io as a gateway between the browser and a
0mq network. That said...
Both good suggestions, I'd forgotten completely about Paul's bridge. On the
node/sockio/zmq/php route, igor had a good (and
Okay, will give that a try. Is there a reason why I couldn't use PUB/SUB
sockets for this interaction?
-Andrei
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Michel Pelletier
pelletier.mic...@gmail.com wrote:
If not getting a timely response is an exceptional condition, then you
can throw away your REQ
I think this patch might address this issue:
http://groups.crossroads.io/groups/crossroads-dev/messages/topic/28TjewHeVHgn2J933hQDrp
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 7:19 PM, Yi Ding yi.s.d...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone,
I'm running into a (related?) issue where after a period of being idle,
the
Yi,
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Yi Ding yi.s.d...@gmail.com wrote:
I think this patch might address this issue:
http://groups.crossroads.io/groups/crossroads-dev/messages/topic/28TjewHeVHgn2J933hQDrp
Nicely spotted!
Feel free to backport it to libzmq, test it, and make a pull request.
Hello All,
Any help on this i am kind of stuck at this and not able to move ahead.
I tried to search this error but i didnt find any satisfactory results.
Please guide me.
From: proj_symb...@live.com
To: zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 12:46:13 +0200
Subject: Re:
Ok Solved the problem again, by mistake i was trying to call setsockopt on a
PUB socket. :-)
From: proj_symb...@live.com
To: zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 04:55:18 +0200
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] FW: Help With Regard To the ZMQ Forwarder
Hello All,
Any help on this
Hello Pieter ,
Thanks a lot for reply, and i must say this a great mailing list i have ever
experienced. :-)
The problem was on my side and if you see my latest reply i solved it, i am
kind of new to this domain and thats why it is taking me some time to get some
basics out. :-)
Thanks
Hi all,
Problem: people using setsockopt wrongly get weird downstream
behaviours that can take time to debug if they don't systematically
check their return codes.
Solution: libzmq should assert if passed an invalid getsockopt or setsockopt.
Thoughts? Seems a valid use for assertions. I'll
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 21:16, Ronald Swain proj_symb...@live.com wrote:
Hello Pieter ,
Thanks a lot for reply, and i must say this a great mailing list i have
ever experienced. :-)
The problem was on my side and if you see my latest reply i solved it, i
am kind of new to this domain and
Hello MinRK,
Yes you are correct i am new to Python 3 too, but i am trying hard to figure
out how the things are happening.
Thanks for your support and hope the next question takes some time :-)
Regards,
Ronald
From: benjami...@gmail.com
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:30:38 -0700
To:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 21:27, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
Hi all,
Problem: people using setsockopt wrongly get weird downstream
behaviours that can take time to debug if they don't systematically
check their return codes.
Solution: libzmq should assert if passed an invalid
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 11:43 PM, MinRK benjami...@gmail.com wrote:
Holy crap, no.
:-) Fair enough. Just double-checking the assumptions.
-Pieter
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
Hi, I asked this earlier in IRC:
11:38 lestrrat: shouldn't zmq_init( -1 ) be an error (i.e. return
NULL) ?seems like a check used to exist until 6e71a54b, but after
that it's gone
Is this intentional? It used to return NULL until the above commit.
--d
I've sent a pull request: https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/pull/298
When you have an issue, you can comment on the PR. If/when it gets
merged you can test it...
Thanks!
-Pieter
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Daisuke Maki lestr...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, I asked this earlier in IRC:
11:38
18 matches
Mail list logo
