Hi,
I'm trying to build ZeroMQ 2.2.0 withOpenPGM using Visual Studio 2008
express. I've installed OpenPGM on windows using the binaries from
http://miru.hk/openpgm/. On Visual Studio I've added OpenPGM 5.1.118\lib to
Additional library directories and OpenPGM 5.1.118\include to Additional
include
Hi Nick,
Adding the 'lib' and 'include' folders as additional directories is enough
to satisfy Visual Studio when it comes to finding files, but it doesn't
tell Visual Studio exactly which files to link into the resulting binary.
You'll have to configure your project to include those libs. You
Thanks for the heads up, but apparently when you choose to buildWithPgm it
includes the libpgm.lib to Additional depencies section under Linker -
Input. So I believe that VS is looking for correct files in correct places,
libpgm.lib in C:\Program Files (x86)\OpenPGM 5.1.118\lib.
On Tue, Apr 10,
On 10 April 2012 06:56, Nick Eriksson nic...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks for the heads up, but apparently when you choose to buildWithPgm it
includes the libpgm.lib to Additional depencies section under Linker -
Input. So I believe that VS is looking for correct files in correct places,
Hello,
I am experimenting with ZeroMQ to switch what used to be a synchronous
flow of message passing to asynchronous. The unit test for this scenario
would send a message, and then assert that the receiver got the message.
The unit test code was something like this:
SendMessage(Message);
Hi,
I am hoping for some performance tuning tips w.r.t. Windows.
Our setup is two Windows XP SP3 systems with just an ethernet cable between
them (cat 5e, Intel gigabit NICs). Between the two systems, I am able to
achieve ~70MB/s (using TCP with pcattcp).
I have two processes using 0MQ version
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 01:39:57AM +0200, Martin Hurton wrote:
Hi, the gcc_421_char_traits.hpp header is included in the project.
Seems strange that the compiler complains the file is missing.
Not in the tarball I got:
# find tmp/SunOS5100i386_64/zeromq-2.2.0/ -name gcc_421_char_traits.hpp
On Apr 10, 2012, at 9:42 AM, jonathan.me...@schneider-electric.com
jonathan.me...@schneider-electric.com wrote:
Hello,
I am experimenting with ZeroMQ to switch what used to be a synchronous flow
of message passing to asynchronous. The unit test for this scenario would
send a message, and
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:50 PM, AJ Lewis aj.le...@quantum.com wrote:
# find tmp/SunOS5100i386_64/zeromq-2.2.0/ -name gcc_421_char_traits.hpp
returns nothing. Did I get a bad tarball, or is it in git, but not in
the tarball??
It's missing from the tarball; it wasn't listed in the Makefile.am
OK, the fixed tarballs are now up. There are no code changes; this
just adds src/gcc_421_char_traits.hpp to the tarballs.
-Pieter
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 5:50 PM, AJ Lewis aj.le...@quantum.com wrote:
# find
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:33:20PM +0200, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
OK, the fixed tarballs are now up. There are no code changes; this
just adds src/gcc_421_char_traits.hpp to the tarballs.
That appears to have done it.
Thanks!
AJ
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com
NP, thanks for hunting down the problem.
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 9:00 PM, AJ Lewis aj.le...@quantum.com wrote:
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 08:33:20PM +0200, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
OK, the fixed tarballs are now up. There are no code changes; this
just adds src/gcc_421_char_traits.hpp to the
PyZMQ includes a PUBHandler to distribute Python logging messages
through a ZMQ PUB socket. I want to log from applications like web
servers that may have multiple child processes, and the PUB socket
binds to a specific port. What's a good alternative? It looks like I
could 1) write a
Or you can change the bind into a connect, and have the subscriber(s)
do the bind. Then all your pubs can connect to any number of bound sub
endpoints which in turn will receive all pub'ed messages.
I have not seen this code in question, so I could be wrong about how
it works, but that seems like
Thanks, Michel. That would handle the fan-in, but I'd need to relay
from a single bound SUB to another PUB, or have multiple bound SUBs as
you suggest. In my case, I'd like to plug in arbitrary subscribers as
needed to sip from the firehose, so I think I still need a fan-out
step. Then my first
15 matches
Mail list logo
