Hi,
I am planning to use zeromq 3.2 pub sub in our production systems and
wanted to check with the community. How stable is zeromq 3.2 for production
use? Has anybody used it in production systems for pub sub model.
For our application the following two requirements are critical
1. Minimize
Chuck Remes lists at chuckremes.com writes:
Oh, so the threads are short-lived then. In that case, you should create a
pool of them and have each thread
check out the socket from the pool when it needs to use it and check it back
in again when the thread exits.
If the pool is protected by a
OK.
The libstdc++ shared object from the NDK defines very few symbols, around
twenty, mostly for what google claims to support: exceptions and such.
In order to use the STL, one must use their stlport beta library which I
believe is included since NDKr5.
The shared object is present on my SGSIII,
On Jul 18, 2012, at 2:49 AM, moteus wrote:
Chuck Remes lists at chuckremes.com writes:
Oh, so the threads are short-lived then. In that case, you should create a
pool of them and have each thread
check out the socket from the pool when it needs to use it and check it
back
in again when
Hi,
Well, after realizing its an issue with STL, I spent half the day on the net
researching Android NDK and C++ STL.
Indeed, the default implementation is minimal according to the docs.
The issue is really an issue since we are using the Android NDK as standalone
compiler. As a full build
Forget to mention that I didn't know what you meant by fix those lines
How do I fix them?
-Original Message-
From: Victor Perron vic...@iso3103.net
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] zeromq-dev Digest, Vol 55, Issue 14
To: ZeroMQ development list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
Message-ID:
I thought, not use 'assign'. But the issue has been reported and discussed
in the Zeromq dev list.
I changed the Wiki today; you should stick to 2.2 for now, because a proper
fix is out of quick reach with 3.x .
It's either a lot of changes in the instructions in order to make zeromq
use stlport
Hi Ron,
Sure, but, as I said before - I liked both, and both are great. I liked them
far more than anything else. So, I don't claim one is better than another.
What, in my case, made me chose MP over PB in the end is:
1. I need to send bool, int8,16,32,64, float, double, string, and
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 11:17 AM, aalok sood aa...@ideadevice.com wrote:
Thanks for your suggestion Ian.
I have a similar model in place, but the issue is how do I find out how
many responses are going to come in on my pull socket.
In essence, can I somehow find out how many backend workers
0mq at TheStangeLoop, 23-25 Sept 2012:
https://thestrangeloop.com/sessions/software-architecture-using-zeromq
--
Benjamin Henrion bhenrion at ffii.org
FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762
In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software
patents in Europe, the patent
Alex Keahan akeahan at gbtradingllc.com writes:
$ ./syncpub
[1] 6611
$ Waiting for subscribers
$ ./syncsub A
[2] 6612
$ ./syncsub B
[3] 6613
$ Broadcasting messages
Message mismatch: received 'Msg #1266' expected 'Msg #1001'
A: received 1000 updates
Message mismatch: received 'Msg
11 matches
Mail list logo
