On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Arthur O'Dwyer art...@push.am wrote:
I hit the ones that looked most like real bugs and filed a pull request.
https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/pull/413
Interestingly, the just strange code at src\zmq.cpp(489) did seem to
have a real bug, after all.
Thanks
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 2:12 AM, Iggy Philly iggy.phi...@hotmail.com wrote:
I did try adding this (for several differnt filters including ):
string filt = test;
zmq_setsockopt(socket, ZMQ_SUBSCRIBE, filt.c_str(), filt.length());
Yep, you need to add that in - by default SUB will reject all
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 4:25 AM, Johnny Gozde joh...@jgoz.net wrote:
Hi, clrzmq binding maintainer here. It hasn't been planned (by me), but if
you have access to those environments, I'd gladly accept pull requests.
I can't speak for libzmq, but I'm sure they would accept pull requests for
I've added the subscription to the code and am now sending multiple messages
with no change in behavior. I also tried changing the transport from inproc to
tcp and the problem remains (that change is commented out). So, I don't think
it's an inproc problem. I can't help but think I'm missing
Guessing you're not setting up your pollitem correctly. Try setting
pollitem.events to ZMQ_POLLIN and pollitem.revents to 0.
On 8/25/12 9:41 AM, Iggy Philly wrote:
I've added the subscription to the code and am now sending multiple
messages with no change in behavior. I also tried changing the
Oh man. That was it. Thank you!
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 10:21:08 -0400
From: s...@compuserve.com
To: zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] Problem using inproc - What am I doing wrong?
Guessing you're not setting up your
pollitem correctly. Try setting
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 3:30 PM, Iggy Philly iggy.phi...@hotmail.com wrote:
Oh man. That was it. Thank you!
Good spot Stuart! Reevents and events being used the other way round.
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
Thanks, Ian. But I am more interested in the results that ZeroMQ has
accomplished. Has anyone from ZeroMQ run any test on loopback that can
share some results?
-J
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 3:57 PM, Ian Barber ian.bar...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:20 PM, Julie Anderson
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Julie Anderson
julie.anderson...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks, Ian. But I am more interested in the results that ZeroMQ has
accomplished. Has anyone from ZeroMQ run any test on loopback that can share
some results?
-J
The perf tests are the zeromq benchmarks - if
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 1:20 AM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Arthur O'Dwyer art...@push.am wrote:
I hit the ones that looked most like real bugs and filed a pull request.
https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/pull/413
Interestingly, the just strange
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 1:12 PM, Julie Anderson
julie.anderson...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Java NIO UDP benchmark results snipped
So my questions for the community are:
1 - Is my minimum time of 13 micros with average of 19 micros optimum for
this round trip packet test. It looks like I am
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Arthur O'Dwyer art...@push.am wrote:
(Btw, wouldn't it make sense for 3.2 stable to be a release branch off of
libzmq, rather than a whole separate repo? Then you wouldn't have to
ask everyone to make two copies of their patches.)
It wouldn't make any
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 8:25 PM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 7:20 PM, Arthur O'Dwyer art...@push.am wrote:
(Btw, wouldn't it make sense for 3.2 stable to be a release branch off of
libzmq, rather than a whole separate repo? Then you wouldn't have to
ask
On Aug 25, 2012, at 10:44 AM, Julie Anderson wrote:
Thanks, Ian. But I am more interested in the results that ZeroMQ has
accomplished. Has anyone from ZeroMQ run any test on loopback that can share
some results?
I can show you a bunch of performance results on a machine that is now 5 years
Hi Michel,
Question was about the latency to wake up a quiet thread blocking on a
select. The answer was already given to me: busy spinning. I was able to
pull down the latency to around 60 micros for a a single packet. As you
increase the number of packets it goes down exponentially to 10
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 9:32 PM, Julie Anderson
julie.anderson...@gmail.com wrote:
Does ZeroMQ support some kind of reliable UDP for a publisher-subscriber /
one-to-many asynchronous messaging system?
-J
Sort of - the EPGM transport does for PUB/SUB, UDP based multicast.
Ian
16 matches
Mail list logo
