Thanks Pieter,
NetMQ doesn't have authentication yet, but once authentication is in place
the token is not needed (and the credentials can be retrieved per message).
What is do needed for me at least is a way for the publisher to decide if
subscriber subscription request is accepted or not, or
Let's clarify:
Process client proxy1 proxy2 worker
| |---| |--||
socket cl f1 b1f2 b2 wk
endpoint |ce1-b| |ce2-b|
I'm going to FOSDEM.
Perhaps see you there then.
Rg,
Arnaud
On 01/13/2014 12:44 PM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
I'm organizing a FOSDEM devroom on Sunday, for the Internet of
Things[1]. So far there are no ZeroMQ speakers there but it'd be cool
if some came.
FOSDEM is in Brussels every year
Pieter Hintjens ph at imatix.com writes:
Hi Alexey,
The REQ_RELAXED code is newish and may have things to fix. Could you
make a minimal test case (see the zeromq/issues repo for examples),
and log an issue?
Thanks
Pieter
Hello I just create new issue[1]
[1]
I'll probably be attending as well, I'll treat a beer if I'm there :)
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Arnaud Loonstra arn...@sphaero.orgwrote:
I'm going to FOSDEM.
Perhaps see you there then.
Rg,
Arnaud
On 01/13/2014 12:44 PM, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
I'm organizing a FOSDEM devroom
Hello,
I'd be happy to have a HBM (High Beer Mark) in nonblocking messaging spirit.
Is Friday evening ok to anyone?
Lukasz
2014-01-28 Diego Duclos diego.duc...@palmstonegames.com
I'll probably be attending as well, I'll treat a beer if I'm there :)
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:37 AM,
LOL, that definitely would be uplifting. We would need to subscribe to
the same PUB then :)
Arnaud
On 01/28/2014 11:45 AM, Łukasz Nowak wrote:
Hello,
I'd be happy to have a HBM (High Beer Mark) in nonblocking messaging spirit.
Is Friday evening ok to anyone?
Lukasz
--
w:
I come from near the french border, if someone has a place for me to stay
friday evening I'd definatly be game for a drink.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Arnaud Loonstra arn...@sphaero.orgwrote:
LOL, that definitely would be uplifting. We would need to subscribe to
the same PUB then :)
Hello,
We can SUB to some of fine PUBs in center of Bruxelles. We PUSH to the bar,
they PULL the beer, so lets be the SINK?
The default one for FOSDEM is Delirium Cafe, it will be crowded, really
crowded, but funny and with a lot of various beers (they claim to have 2000
sorts available).
Am 28.01.2014 um 11:45 schrieb Łukasz Nowak em...@lnowak.com:
Hello,
I'd be happy to have a HBM (High Beer Mark) in nonblocking messaging spirit.
Is Friday evening ok to anyone?
coming saturday morning, leaving sunday evening - so Saturday would be my
preference
- Michael
Lukasz
Am 28.01.2014 um 09:45 schrieb Doron Somech somdo...@gmail.com:
Thanks Pieter,
NetMQ doesn't have authentication yet, but once authentication is in place
the token is not needed (and the credentials can be retrieved per message).
What is do needed for me at least is a way for the
Come to the Iot devroom on Sunday maybe, that's where I'll be. Aw.121 I
think.
On Jan 28, 2014 10:52 AM, Diego Duclos diego.duc...@palmstonegames.com
wrote:
I'll probably be attending as well, I'll treat a beer if I'm there :)
On Tue, Jan 28, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Arnaud Loonstra
I have added a 100 ms LINGER to all sockets, but it does not change
anything.
https://github.com/lalebarde/libzmq/commit/e64498610ce8976b9cade226e415b7646a7d02b3
Le 28/01/2014 15:20, Laurent Alebarde a écrit :
Hi Devs,
I am working on a test derived from /test_proxy.cpp/ with the use
I forgot to close the two additional sockets of the test ! :-[
Sorry for the disturbance.
Le 28/01/2014 15:37, Laurent Alebarde a écrit :
I have added a 100 ms LINGER to all sockets, but it does not change
anything.
I need to send zeromq messages from very short-lived processes, and
I'm wondering how best to go about it. When I say short-lived, I mean
on the order of 10-20ms (with all messages going to either localhost
or over a fast LAN, so this is feasible at least in principle). I am
using PUB/SUB, and
PUSH sockets will block regardless of whether they have a connection or
not, so the POLLOUT wait would be unnecessary.
This strikes me as another case where it would be beneficial to allow the
user to set different policies for the various socket types, rather than
having them hard-coded. For
Hi,
3.2.4 compiles and all test pass on RHEL5.5 but 4.0.3 fails on these tests:
zeromq 4.0.3: tests/test-suite.log
# TOTAL: 43
# PASS: 33
# SKIP: 0
# XFAIL: 0
# FAIL: 10
# XPASS: 0
# ERROR: 0
.. contents::
17 matches
Mail list logo
