Hi,
I've reported this weird bug https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/issues/1302
that we hit last week, I wonder if anybody experienced the same thing or
can reproduce it. Basically, we saw a progressive file handle leak that
crashed our application after about an hour of network outage.
Any
But there is a gist!
https://gist.github.com/cbusbey/11265987
We wrote this example back when we started the gssapi implementation, in
the same spirit as Pieter's blog post examples. If you need something
more, I'll be happy to work something up for you.
On Jan 17, 2015 6:24 PM, Pieter Hintjens
brian,
maybe this is a setup issue.
when i run it, the received beacon is empty, and the listener only returns
after the timeout expires. (i changed the timeout to 5s to help debug this.)
so i deduce the listener never gets what the publisher sends.
can there be firewalls or some other
pieter,
what is the status of zyre? including near term plans and so forth?
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
Andrew: what is actually published is the IP address of the beacon = so the
HI in the example is a topic, and not what is actually received. So, the
publisher is publishing on topic HI, and the subscriber is subscribing on
topic HI. Running locally:
./b
Beacon configured on: 192.168.1.199
Andrew - the beacon uses IPv4 UDP broadcasts - so it could very well be a
networking issue. Thanks for all the feedback by the way! Feel free to
file issues you run into on the issue tracker as well, or hit me up on
#zeromq on freenode irc (I use the nickname taotetek there).
Once I get some
It's a very difficult and deep question, if you're building a true P2P
network. If all peers are equal, nobody has some truth with regards to
the identity of another peer. Say you have the following protocol:
each peer starts announcing the identity of all known peers before
exchange data. One
Yes, I understand the web of trust model. In my case, all (legitimate) nodes
are controlled by the same organization, so I can afford something akin to a
CA. My question stays, how could I adapt the Harmony pattern to use curve?
And, back to my original question: can I assume that
Sure, we could do that. Most people use it from github master, I think.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Joss Gray j...@jossgray.net wrote:
Are there any plans do a new stable release?
On 18 Jan 2015 18:15, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
Zyre has come along nicely, it works well and
I've looked at that already and still prefer the router-router setup and
have a convenient solution for discovery, which I'll get back to shortly.
Obviously my immediate curve problem would be solved when using the Harmony
pattern because you always create a new dealer socket for each outbound
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 7:43 PM, André Caron andre.l.ca...@gmail.com wrote:
... the
Harmony pattern doesn't provide for secure exchange of public keys.
It is identical to any pattern. Long term key exchange has to happen
out of band. Using router-router changes nothing here. Each peer has
its
Are there any plans do a new stable release?
On 18 Jan 2015 18:15, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
Zyre has come along nicely, it works well and has a clean API.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Andrew Hume and...@humeweb.com wrote:
pieter,
what is the status of zyre?
I'd recommend reading about the Harmony pattern in the Guide.
Router-to-router topologies tend to be nasty. I don't use them, and
don't recommend them.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 5:57 PM, André Caron andre.l.ca...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I've been building an example of a router-router setup in
Hi all,
I've been building an example of a router-router setup in which all nodes
dynamically discover each other. This currently works like a charm. Now,
I'm trying to add curve support for this application, which is proving a
bit confusing despite the API's apparent simplicity.
Basically,
Zyre has come along nicely, it works well and has a clean API.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Andrew Hume and...@humeweb.com wrote:
pieter,
what is the status of zyre? including near term plans and so forth?
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
are there any Go bindings for the API?
On Jan 18, 2015, at 10:14 AM, Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com wrote:
Zyre has come along nicely, it works well and has a clean API.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 4:37 PM, Andrew Hume and...@humeweb.com wrote:
pieter,
what is the status of zyre?
You should not be changing public keys IMO.
It is supported and documented and thus guaranteed, however I believe
it's a misfeature that solves no real problem and rather, opens the
door for confusion.
On Sun, Jan 18, 2015 at 8:05 PM, Andre Caron andre.l.ca...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I understand
17 matches
Mail list logo
