The short answer is no, but you can have a dedicate socket for urgent
messages, use this socket for urgent messages.
In your message handling loop you can give priority to the urgent socket by
handling messages from the urgent first.
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 11:49 AM, Bachmair Florian -
Hi!
Is it possible to send Messages with a certain priority?
So that time critical messages will be sent first?
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev
No objections from me.
On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 12:04 PM, Arnaud Loonstra arn...@sphaero.org wrote:
It seems it is, only I need to signup and give the tool access to the
zeromq community...
Any objections?
Rg,
Arnaud
On 2015-05-22 19:25, Arnaud Kapp wrote:
Hello,
I don't know
Just to be clear, that I understand you right
With one Socket: State1(10ms) - State_2(10ms) - State3(10ms) -
State4(10ms)-RandomData(100ms)- State5(10ms)
In that case State 5 will arrise 100ms later than expected because there
such big RandomData which takes 100ms to transmit
You suggestion
It seems it is, only I need to signup and give the tool access to the
zeromq community...
Any objections?
Rg,
Arnaud
On 2015-05-22 19:25, Arnaud Kapp wrote:
Hello,
I don't know coveralls, but I assume it is a elaborate code coverage
tools.
Basically it tells you how well the codebase is
Hi all,
Just as a notice I'm going to merge a PR on Pyre which breaks the API
to reflect Zyre better. Essentially the changes can be done
automatically with a simple sed script:
sed -i 's/get_uuid/uuid/g' $1
sed -i 's/get_peer_groups/peer_groups/g' $1
sed -i 's/get_own_groups/own_groups/g' $1
Yes. Also the handling of the messages can take time, so if you have 1000
messages in the queue and you want to make sure the urgent message is being
handled before the all of the messages in the queue.
With that, are you sure you need this complexity? If the load is not very
high, the messages
