[zeromq-dev] [ANNOUNCE] ZeroMQ/2.2.0 stable released

2012-04-04 Thread Pieter Hintjens
Hi all, We're pleased to announce the release of ZeroMQ/2.2.0 (stable). Get the software from the usual place: http://www.zeromq.org/intro:get-the-software Thanks to everyone who provided patches and changes for this release. -Pieter Hintjens 0MQ version 2.2.0 (Stable), released on

Re: [zeromq-dev] [ANNOUNCE] ZeroMQ/2.2.0 stable released

2012-04-04 Thread William Brown
-Original Message- From: zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org [mailto:zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org] On Behalf Of Pieter Hintjens Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 7:42 AM To: zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org Subject: [zeromq-dev] [ANNOUNCE] ZeroMQ/2.2.0 stable released Hi all, We're pleased

Re: [zeromq-dev] [ANNOUNCE] ZeroMQ/2.2.0 stable released

2012-04-04 Thread Joshua Foster
- From: zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org [mailto:zeromq-dev-boun...@lists.zeromq.org] On Behalf Of Pieter Hintjens Sent: Wednesday, April 04, 2012 7:42 AM To: zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org Subject: [zeromq-dev] [ANNOUNCE] ZeroMQ/2.2.0 stable released Hi all, We're pleased to announce

Re: [zeromq-dev] [ANNOUNCE] ZeroMQ/2.2.0 stable released

2012-04-04 Thread Pieter Hintjens
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:39 PM, William Brown william.br...@ericsson.com wrote:        Maybe it's just me, but I feel like there's a disconnect between the 0MQ        library download and the supported bindings. It's unclear which version of        the bindings (and how to download

Re: [zeromq-dev] [ANNOUNCE] ZeroMQ/2.2.0 stable released

2012-04-04 Thread William Brown
] ZeroMQ/2.2.0 stable released On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:39 PM, William Brown william.br...@ericsson.com wrote:        Maybe it's just me, but I feel like there's a disconnect between the 0MQ        library download and the supported bindings. It's unclear which version of        the bindings

Re: [zeromq-dev] [ANNOUNCE] ZeroMQ/2.2.0 stable released

2012-04-04 Thread Santy, Michael
In theory bindings aim to work with all released versions of 0MQ, though it's up to each binding group to make this work. I've been meaning to bring up this topic for a while. It seems to me that knowing that a specific set of bindings are designed to work with a specific version of 0MQ is a

Re: [zeromq-dev] [ANNOUNCE] ZeroMQ/2.2.0 stable released

2012-04-04 Thread Brian Granger
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Santy, Michael michael.sa...@dynetics.com wrote: In theory bindings aim to work with all released versions of 0MQ, though it's up to each binding group to make this work. I've been meaning to bring up this topic for a while.  It seems to me that knowing that a

Re: [zeromq-dev] [ANNOUNCE] ZeroMQ/2.2.0 stable released

2012-04-04 Thread Chuck Remes
On Apr 4, 2012, at 10:44 AM, Brian Granger wrote: On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 7:21 AM, Santy, Michael michael.sa...@dynetics.com wrote: In theory bindings aim to work with all released versions of 0MQ, though it's up to each binding group to make this work. I've been meaning to bring up this

Re: [zeromq-dev] [ANNOUNCE] ZeroMQ/2.2.0 stable released

2012-04-04 Thread Pieter Hintjens
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Santy, Michael michael.sa...@dynetics.com wrote: I recall a while back that the C++ bindings went the opposite direction in that they were split from the core 0MQ distribution into their own project, but I never really understood the reasoning. The reason for

Re: [zeromq-dev] [ANNOUNCE] ZeroMQ/2.2.0 stable released

2012-04-04 Thread Santy, Michael
The reason for this was that the C++ bindings, like all of them, can be (and should be) independent from the libzmq bindings. They have different contributors, different users, different documentation, etc. OK. Thanks all for the clarification. Mike