Hi,
I'm implementing a DEALER/ROUTER schema in which messages are sent from
DEALER to ROUTER only, no messages are sent back. My question is related to
HWMs in both sockets.
When reaching the SNDHWM in DEALER socket, application will block (this is
clear in documentation), however, it is not
The behavior is defined here: http://rfc.zeromq.org/spec:28
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 2:20 PM, Diego Fons diego.f...@intraway.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm implementing a DEALER/ROUTER schema in which messages are sent from
DEALER to ROUTER only, no messages are sent back. My question is related to
HWMs
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:10 AM, Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de wrote:
Pieter: Would it be possible to put all the examples of the guide into
a git project and have them included in the auto compile done for
every pull request?
The examples are in a subdirectory of the Guide git
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 09:51:50AM +0200, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 3:10 AM, Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de
wrote:
Pieter: Would it be possible to put all the examples of the guide into
a git project and have them included in the auto compile done for
every
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:37 AM, Goswin von Brederlow
goswin-...@web.de wrote:
If the two get merged then why not merge the zsock class with the
libzqm socket structure. Use it as is for the zsock interface and cast
it to void * for the sake of the old API. A true merge and not just
layering
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:06:29AM +0200, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
This is one of those rare roadmap / vision threads.
Concretely all this has to happen first:
- release 4.0.5 sometime very soon
- release 4.1.0 RC sometime later
- update Guide for 4.1
- release CZMQ v3.0 RC
I think CZMQ
Conceptually I like the idea of czmq folding back into libzmq. While
requiring both llibzmq and czmq for a language binding that wraps czmq
isn't the end of the world, it is an additional complexity.
I very much look forward to the czmq 3.0 release, and I'm hoping to have
goczmq feature complete
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Goswin von Brederlow
goswin-...@web.de wrote:
One last thing and then I will get back to work.
Ah, work, that mysterious thing we do when we're not talking about it :-)
The zring class in CZMQ I feel is still experimental and I would like
to keep that in
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 01:46:20PM +0200, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:36 AM, Goswin von Brederlow
goswin-...@web.de wrote:
One last thing and then I will get back to work.
Ah, work, that mysterious thing we do when we're not talking about it :-)
The zring class
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de wrote:
Do you actually need it?
After all the work, that's a sad question. What I see are too-large
patches done in I want to try this yet I've not defined a clean
problem statement directions, which stress other people,
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 06:34:32PM +0200, Pieter Hintjens wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 6:20 PM, Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de
wrote:
Do you actually need it?
After all the work, that's a sad question. What I see are too-large
patches done in I want to try this yet I've not
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 7:50 PM, Goswin von Brederlow goswin-...@web.de wrote:
How much of the time was spend on merging zhash support into zring?
Ah, sure. That was a short job and can certainly be kicked out again later.
Sorry, my bad.
I think what doesn't quite work right is this:
...
A quick question for the zeromq experts if I may?
Given a DEALER to ROUTER zeromq connection which is able to operate
asynchronously; what is the best way to coordinate inbound and outbound
message handling such that the DEALER socket is not blocked and an
application is able to react and send
Please read the Guide and work through the examples, it has lots of
explanation and examples of how to do this kind of thing.
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 10:36 AM, Riskybiz riskybizl...@live.com wrote:
A quick question for the zeromq experts if I may?
Given a DEALER to ROUTER zeromq connection
.
Message: 29
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 11:29:01 +0200
From: Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] DEALER-ROUTER question.
To: ZeroMQ development list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
Message-ID:
CADL5_sjhfSqq_YDJq59pindtY3t15dUpiJVO3wr=qehn+ty...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text
how to solve my own
zeromq issues in the future?
Riskybiz.
Message: 29
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 11:29:01 +0200
From: Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] DEALER-ROUTER question.
To: ZeroMQ development list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
Message-ID
in the future?
Riskybiz.
Message: 29
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 11:29:01 +0200
From: Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] DEALER-ROUTER question.
To: ZeroMQ development list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
Message-ID:
CADL5_sjhfSqq_YDJq59pindtY3t15dUpiJVO3wr=
qehn+ty
] DEALER-ROUTER question.
To: ZeroMQ development list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
Message-ID:
CADL5_sjhfSqq_YDJq59pindtY3t15dUpiJVO3wr=
qehn+ty...@mail.gmail.com
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Please read the Guide and work through the examples, it has lots of
explanation
?
Riskybiz.
Message: 29
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 11:29:01 +0200
From: Pieter Hintjens p...@imatix.com
Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] DEALER-ROUTER question.
To: ZeroMQ development list zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
Message-ID:
CADL5_sjhfSqq_YDJq59pindtY3t15dUpiJVO3wr=qehn+ty...@mail.gmail.com
19 matches
Mail list logo
