Sounds good to me. The extra complexity makes things more fragile IMO.
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 8:16 PM, Thomas Rodgers rodg...@twrodgers.com wrote:
To understand correctly, we don't propagate such failures (as
exceptions or error returns), and even if we did, it'd be pointless...
My thinly
To understand correctly, we don't propagate such failures (as
exceptions or error returns), and even if we did, it'd be pointless...
My thinly veiled agenda here is -
We are already toast in this case anyway, can we just get rid of the extra
complexity that comes with trying pretend we can
To understand correctly, we don't propagate such failures (as
exceptions or error returns), and even if we did, it'd be pointless...
FWIW we added quite a lot handling in CZMQ to handle memory
exhaustion. I don't particularly like that, as it makes things complex
and it's unclear that there's any
