> From: zeromq-dev On Behalf Of Brett
> Viren via zeromq-dev
> Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2019 7:37 AM
> To: Attila Magyari
> Cc: Brett Viren; ZeroMQ development list
> Subject: Re: [zeromq-dev] Which socket to choose?
>
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
> Hi again, Attil
Hi again, Attila,
Attila Magyari writes:
> So having two sockets, one for sending and one for receiving is the way to
> go?
Disclaimer: I'm a zeromq amateur so take my advice as such. I don't
know if this two-socket approach is best but it's certainly one way to
do it. (For a design that
Look into router/dealer
On Tue, 2019-08-20 at 08:28 +0300, Attila Magyari wrote:
> Thanks Brett,
>
> So having two sockets, one for sending and one for receiving is the
> way to go?
>
> By message order restrictions I meant the send/recv pattern to be
> unrestricted, no mandatory order of
Thanks Brett,
So having two sockets, one for sending and one for receiving is the way to
go?
By message order restrictions I meant the send/recv pattern to be
unrestricted, no mandatory order of send/recv. The server could send an
arbitrary number of messages to the client.
One-to-many as in
Attila Magyari writes:
> Reading the docs all the other sockets seem to have extra restrictions or
> complications, which would not meet my needs:
> - bidirectional
I assume you mean symmetrically bidirectional?
If so, a pair of PUSH/PULL (or PUB/SUB) on each end would provide that.
> - no
