[i’m kinda sorta thinking out-loud here, seeing if this strikes a chord with
anyone, see if i’m missing something stupid here..]
i’m wondering if anyone has examples (or war-stories) of this in the wild
distributing curve public keys outside of what the doc thus far spec’s… the
good, bad,
On Fri, 2016-11-25 at 12:22 +0100, zmqdev wrote:
> On 25.11.2016 11:50, Luca Boccassi wrote:
> > What I can say is that we have a unit test for this situation:
> >
> > https://github.com/zeromq/libzmq/blob/master/tests/test_fork.cpp
> >
> > And the child closes the (TCP) socket explicitly before
Hi Colin,
Being a ZeroMQ maintainer is easy and fun and I definitely recommend
it :-)
The actual maintainer role is well codified in the C4 process that
Trevor mentioned and it's very simple in the end.
And if you have used the library for a long time I'm sure you'll do a
great job developing
