Re: [zeromq-dev] ZeroMQ 4.2 release, planning

2016-08-26 Thread Luca Boccassi
I've given some more thoughts and testing to the alignment issue. I can reproduce the problem by enabling alignment checks on x86 too. But most importantly, I think we cannot get away from bumping the ABI with this fix, however we rearrange it, simply because applications need to be rebuilt

Re: [zeromq-dev] Is there a zmq debug tool?

2016-08-26 Thread zhangkai.gis
I use vpn combine 192.168.9.58 to 172.16.9.108.I have no idea is the vpn effects. 2016-08-26 zhangkai.gis From:"zhangkai.gis" Date:2016-08-26 08:45 Subject:Re: [zeromq-dev] Is there a zmq debug tool? To:"ZeroMQ development list" Cc:

Re: [zeromq-dev] nomenclature

2016-08-26 Thread Andrew Hume
o. i think this is a misunderstanding. it seems we’re using some terms very differently. when i say “how the data will flow thru the system”, i mean “datum X needs to go to entity E via intermediate point Z”. Z might be a queue and i don’t care about any subdetails (at this level) such as

Re: [zeromq-dev] nomenclature

2016-08-26 Thread alex.
Hi Andrew, I have to agree with Pieter here. What you want to be thinking about is: What data should be where? And what shall happen with it when it is there? I feel this is what you also want to do, but I think Pieter is right in pointing out that thinking about all possible data flow is a