[zeromq-dev] goczmq error

2016-11-07 Thread Andrew Hume
i am getting a “send frame error” from SendMessage.
is there anyway to get more information on what is going on?
i tried sticking in a perror right after the C.zframe_send (in sock.go)  but
(apparently) errno had been set (or overwritten) to some unknown error.

andrew

___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Re: [zeromq-dev] No documentation for sockets options ZMQ_SOCKS_PROXY and ZMQ_BLOCKY

2016-11-07 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 11:37 +0100, Peter Kleiweg wrote:
> Peter Kleiweg schreef op de 7e dag van de slachtmaand van het jaar 2016:
> 
> > 
> > Of the new socket options mentioned in the release notes for 
> > ZeroMQ 4.2, the options ZMQ_SOCKS_PROXY and ZMQ_BLOCKY are not 
> > documented in either zmq-getsockopt or zmq-setsockopt.
> > 
> > Should I ignore these?
> > 
> > (I'm updating Go bindings zmq4 for version 4.2)
> 
> But there is a context option ZMQ_BLOCKY, not a socket option. 

Yes good spot, that's a mistake from me when compiling the release
notes, sorry about that.

I've fixed it now.

I've also opened an issue for the lack of documentation of
ZMQ_SOCKS_PROXY.

Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Re: [zeromq-dev] No manpage for zmq_curve_public

2016-11-07 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Mon, 2016-11-07 at 09:16 +0100, Peter Kleiweg wrote:
> The release notes for ZMQ 4.2 mentions the new function 
> zmq_curve_public. This function is undocumented. Is it save to 
> use it anyway?

Yes it should be added to the doc, fair point.

It is safe and the implementation uses, as everything else
crypto-related, libsodium or tweetnacl depending on the configure flags.

Kind regards,
Luca Boccassi


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

Re: [zeromq-dev] No documentation for sockets options ZMQ_SOCKS_PROXY and ZMQ_BLOCKY

2016-11-07 Thread Peter Kleiweg
Peter Kleiweg schreef op de 7e dag van de slachtmaand van het jaar 2016:

> 
> Of the new socket options mentioned in the release notes for 
> ZeroMQ 4.2, the options ZMQ_SOCKS_PROXY and ZMQ_BLOCKY are not 
> documented in either zmq-getsockopt or zmq-setsockopt.
> 
> Should I ignore these?
> 
> (I'm updating Go bindings zmq4 for version 4.2)

But there is a context option ZMQ_BLOCKY, not a socket option. 



-- 
Peter Kleiweg
http://pkleiweg.home.xs4all.nl/
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

[zeromq-dev] No documentation for sockets options ZMQ_SOCKS_PROXY and ZMQ_BLOCKY

2016-11-07 Thread Peter Kleiweg

Of the new socket options mentioned in the release notes for 
ZeroMQ 4.2, the options ZMQ_SOCKS_PROXY and ZMQ_BLOCKY are not 
documented in either zmq-getsockopt or zmq-setsockopt.

Should I ignore these?

(I'm updating Go bindings zmq4 for version 4.2)


-- 
Peter Kleiweg
http://pkleiweg.home.xs4all.nl/
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev

[zeromq-dev] No manpage for zmq_curve_public

2016-11-07 Thread Peter Kleiweg

The release notes for ZMQ 4.2 mentions the new function 
zmq_curve_public. This function is undocumented. Is it save to 
use it anyway?


-- 
Peter Kleiweg
http://pkleiweg.home.xs4all.nl/
___
zeromq-dev mailing list
zeromq-dev@lists.zeromq.org
http://lists.zeromq.org/mailman/listinfo/zeromq-dev