On Thu, 2019-10-24 at 16:55 -0400, Brett Viren via zeromq-dev wrote:
> Hi again,
>
> Doron Somech <
> somdo...@gmail.com
> > writes:
>
> > You need to create multiple connections to enjoy the multiple io
> > threads.
> >
> > So in the remote/local_thr connect to the same endpoint 100 times
> >
To explain point two, you can't easily impose an order of messages across
multiple connections, even to the same peer. It's sort of a fundamental
limit: the only reason a single ZMQ connection can provide in-order
delivery is because it leans on TCP to correct the multiple delivery,
out-of-order
Doron Somech writes:
> You need to create multiple connections to enjoy the multiple io threads.
>
> So in the remote/local_thr connect to the same endpoint 100 times and
> create 10 io threads.
Fantastic!
10 threads in both remote_thr and local_thr,
10 connect() calls in remote_thr.
Make a pull request :)
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019, 20:27 Francesco wrote:
>
>
> Il mer 2 ott 2019, 19:05 Doron Somech ha scritto:
>
>>
>> You don't need to create multiple sockets, just call connect multiple
>> times with same address.
>>
> Wow, really??
> I wish I had known that, I already changed
Il mer 2 ott 2019, 19:05 Doron Somech ha scritto:
>
> You don't need to create multiple sockets, just call connect multiple
> times with same address.
>
Wow, really??
I wish I had known that, I already changed quite a bit of code to use
multiple zmq sockets to make better use of background zmq
You need to create multiple connections to enjoy the multiple io threads.
So in the remote/local_thr connect to the same endpoint 100 times and
create 10 io threads.
You don't need to create multiple sockets, just call connect multiple times
with same address.
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019, 19:45 Brett
Hi Francesco,
I confirm your benchmark using two systems with the same 100 Gbps
Mellanox NICs but with an intervening Juniper QFX5200 switch (100 Gbps
ports).
To reach ~25 Gbps with the largest message sizes required "jumbo frame"
MTU. The default mtu=1500 allows only ~20 Gbps. I also tried
Hi Benjamin,
Il giorno dom 11 ago 2019 alle ore 13:05 Benjamin Henrion
ha scritto:
> Do you have a test which can show first that you can saturate the 100gbps
> link?
>
> Like an iperf or a simple wget test?
I don't have a graph just like the one I created with ZMQ benchmark
utilities but
On 9 Aug 2019 23:36, "Francesco" wrote:
Hi all,
I placed here:
http://zeromq.org/results:100gbe-tests-v432
the results I collected using 2 Mellanox ConnectX-5 linked by 100Gbps
fiber cable.
The results are not too much different from those at 10gpbs
Great job, thank you!
On Fri, 2019-08-09 at 23:34 +0200, Francesco wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I placed here:
> http://zeromq.org/results:100gbe-tests-v432
> the results I collected using 2 Mellanox ConnectX-5 linked by 100Gbps
> fiber cable.
>
> The results are not too much different from those at
Hi all,
I placed here:
http://zeromq.org/results:100gbe-tests-v432
the results I collected using 2 Mellanox ConnectX-5 linked by 100Gbps
fiber cable.
The results are not too much different from those at 10gpbs
(http://zeromq.org/results:10gbe-tests-v432)... the difference in TCP
throughput is
11 matches
Mail list logo
